Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Google Docs Alternatives

The 10 best Google Docs alternatives include popular options such as Microsoft Office Online, Zoho Docs, Quip, Etherpad, OnlyOffice, Dropbox Paper, Nuclino, ProWritingAid, JotterPad, and Scrivener, offering diverse features and utilities to suit varying needs.

Learn more about our top picks for: Google Docs Alternatives

Google Docs is a web-based word processing application that is highly effective for note-taking in the workplace. It allows users to create, edit, and share documents online in real-time, facilitating collaboration and communication among team members. Its features like commenting, version history, and easy access from various devices make it an efficient tool for documenting meetings, brainstorming sessions, and organizing project-related information. Google Docs is popular in professional settings due to its integration with other Google Workspace tools, enhancing productivity and streamlining workflow.

Why would you look for an Alternative to Google Docs?

While Google Docs is a widely used tool for various purposes, its application in the context of meetings reveals certain limitations. These drawbacks become more apparent when we compare Google Docs to specialized software designed for meeting notes. Let’s delve into why seeking alternatives to Google Docs might be beneficial for more efficient meeting management.

Three Reasons to Consider Alternatives to Google Docs for Meetings:

  1. Lack of Specialized Features for Meetings: Google Docs is a general-purpose document editor and lacks features specifically tailored for meeting management. Specialized meeting software often includes tools for agenda setting, action item tracking, and automated minute generation, which are not inherently present in Google Docs. This can lead to inefficient meeting preparation and follow-up processes.
  2. Limited Integration with Meeting Tools: While Google Docs integrates well within its own ecosystem, it may fall short in seamlessly connecting with other meeting-related tools or platforms. Specialized software for meeting notes often offers better integration with a wider range of calendar apps, video conferencing tools, and task management systems, ensuring a more cohesive meeting experience.
  3. Inadequate Real-time Collaboration and Access Control: Although Google Docs supports real-time collaboration, it may not be optimal for meetings where different levels of access and interaction are required. Advanced meeting note software allows for more granular control over who can view, edit, or comment on different sections of the meeting notes, enhancing both security and collaboration efficiency.
The Best Products

Our Recommendations: Google Docs Alternatives

Pick #1


Notion is a versatile tool that has gained significant popularity as an all-in-one workspace for note-taking, project management, and knowledge sharing. Its flexibility makes it an excellent choice for creating meeting agendas and notes. Notion allows users to create custom templates, offering a high degree of personalization for meeting structures. It supports various media types and integrates with many third-party apps. The platform also provides a collaborative environment where team members can contribute and edit in real-time, much like Google Docs, but with enhanced organizational features.

Notion’s interface is highly customizable, allowing users to tailor meeting templates to their specific needs, which is beneficial for maintaining consistency in meeting documentation.
Integrated Task Management: Notion seamlessly integrates task management within notes, enabling users to assign tasks during meetings and track progress, thereby enhancing post-meeting actionability.
Rich Content Support: Supports embedding of various media types, including images, videos, and web content, which can enrich the meeting agenda and notes with diverse content.
Collaborative Features: Real-time collaboration features enable multiple users to work simultaneously on the same document, ensuring effective teamwork during the meeting planning and note-taking process.
Database Functionality: Offers database capabilities for organizing and storing meeting notes, making it easy to retrieve and reference past meetings.
Learning Curve: Notion’s wide range of features can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time to learn and adapt to its interface.
Limited Offline Access: While it offers some offline functionality, Notion is primarily a cloud-based tool, which can be limiting in environments with poor internet connectivity.
Performance Issues: With extensive use, the platform can sometimes experience slow loading times, especially when handling large databases or complex pages.
No In-Built Calendar: Unlike Google Calendar integration in Google Docs, Notion lacks an in-built calendar, requiring additional steps to sync with external calendar apps.
Cost for Advanced Features: While Notion offers a free tier, accessing more advanced features and larger storage requires a paid subscription, which might be a consideration for budget-conscious teams.

Pick #2

Zoho Docs

Zoho Docs is a comprehensive online document management platform that can serve as an excellent alternative to Google Docs. Like Google Docs, Zoho Docs allows users to create, share, and collaboratively edit text documents, spreadsheets, and presentations, however, it provides additional tools for business usage. It boasts features such as user management, secure file sharing, robust administrative controls, and data backups, making it ideal for business deployment. Furthermore, Zoho Docs can seamlessly integrate with other Zoho productivity and business applications, creating a more unified workspace for users.

Enhanced Collaboration Suite: Zoho Docs provides an advanced collaboration suite which includes chat, multi-user editing, and version control, that is more extensive than Google Docs.
Integrated Software Suite: Unlike Google Docs that operates best with other Google applications, Zoho Docs offers a wider variety of software integrations, making it more flexible for businesses already using a diverse mix of software.
Offline Access: While Google Docs allows limited offline access to documents, Zoho Docs provides more thorough offline functionality across its services enabling easy work without an internet connection.
More Structured Organization: Zoho Docs provides a more advanced organizational structure including a detailed tagging system, making it easier for teams to keep track of their documents and files as compared to Google Docs.
Custom Domain Mapping: This feature allows businesses to map their own domain to their Zoho Docs account, providing a more personalized experience than what's available through Google Docs.
Limited Offline Accessibility: Unlike Google Docs which offers full functionality offline, Zoho Docs does not provide complete offline access. Most of the features require internet connectivity which can be problematic in areas with poor internet connectivity.
Inferior User Interface: The user interface of Zoho Docs is not as user-friendly and intuitive as Google Docs. This can lead to a steeper learning curve for those who are new to the platform.
Less Integration with Other Services: Zoho Docs does not provide as robust of an integration with other services as Google Docs does. Google Docs allows you to directly integrate with Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive and other Google services. Zoho's integration with non-Zoho services is more limited.
Smaller User Community: Google Docs boasts a large user community that contributes to regular updates, improvements, and readily available assistance. On the other hand, Zoho Docs has a relatively smaller user community which impacts the frequency of updates and community support.
Lower Collaboration Capabilities: While Zoho Docs does offer real-time collaboration, the feature is not as seamless and does not support as many simultaneous users as Google Docs. Thus, for larger teams, Google Docs might be more effective for real-time collaboration.

Pick #3


Quip is a collaborative productivity software suite that promotes team communication and document sharing in a unified platform. As an alternative to Google Docs, Quip offers features like document creation, real-time editing, and chat messaging integrated directly within working documents. Unlike Google Docs, Quip focuses on minimizing the use of emails and standalone meetings by combining documents, spreadsheets, and communication all into one centralized platform that fosters interactive team collaboration. This makes it an increasingly effective tool for businesses seeking a streamlined approach to team project management and document handling.

Integrated Messaging Feature - Quip comes with a built-in chat feature in its platform where team members can have discussions in real-time, in the context of the document they are co-authoring, which Google Docs does not provide.
Simplified Toolbars - Unlike Google Docs, Quip's interface focuses on the bare essentials needed for creation and collaboration, making it much more user-friendly and less overwhelming, especially for novices.
Centralized Workspace - Quip combines docs, spreadsheets, and slides into a single unified app, making it easier for teams to collaborate without having to switch between different applications, which is necessary in Google's suite of Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides.
Integration with Salesforce - Quip is a Salesforce product, allowing it to integrate seamlessly with other products in the Salesforce ecosystem, providing a clear advantage for businesses already using Salesforce over using Google Docs.
Real-time Collaboration Across Multiple Platforms - Quip allows for real-time collaboration with notes, tasks, and spreadsheets across several devices including, Android, iOS, and desktops, providing a more flexible and efficient workspace than Google Docs.
Quip does not support complex spreadsheet calculations as Google Docs does which can limit functionality for users who require this function for finance, data analysis, or other purposes.
Quip has a lack of add-on integration which Google Docs offers. This includes utilities for citation management, translation tools, and various document templates which enhance the user's experience.
Unlike Google Docs, Quip does not have native presentation software. Users would need to convert documents to another format and import to a separate presentation software which can be cumbersome.
Quip does not have built-in Optical Character Recognition (OCR) while Google Docs does. OCR is the technology used to convert different types of documents, such as scanned paper documents, PDF files or images captured by a digital camera into editable and searchable data.
Localization and language support in Quip is not as extensive as in Google Docs. This could be a limitation for global teams or multilingual users.

Pick #4

Dropbox Paper

Dropbox Paper is a highly collaborative, cloud-based workspace developed by Dropbox that functions as a solid alternative to Google Docs. It allows for document creation, real-time collaboration, and content management all in one place, permitting users to embed rich media like photos, videos, and even SoundCloud clips directly into their documents. While it lacks some advanced formatting and editing features that Google Docs possesses, Dropbox Paper makes up for it with its straightforward interface, prominent focus on team collaboration, comprehensive comment system, and seamless integration with the Dropbox ecosystem.

Enhanced Collaboration - Dropbox Paper provides a seamless collaboration experience, allowing team members to access the same document and work on it simultaneously without the risk of saving over each other's changes.
Comprehensive Integration - Dropbox Paper offers extensive integration with other Dropbox services. This gives users the consolidation advantage where they can find, edit, and share their Paper docs and native files (like Powerpoint and Excel files) in Dropbox, all together in one place.
Better Visual Layout And Design - Dropbox Paper comes with a cleaner, user-friendly layout. Its minimalistic design is a big plus for those who like to work on a clutter-free workspace.
Task Management: Dropbox Paper includes task functionality. This makes it possible to create, assign, and track tasks right within the document, a feature not prominently offered by Google Docs.
Built-in Media Embedding: Dropbox Paper lets users embed various media files (like SoundCloud playbacks and YouTube videos) directly into their documents, providing a richer, more interactive document format compared to Google Docs.
Lack of Advanced Formatting Options - Compared to Google Docs, Dropbox Paper lacks sophisticated formatting options. The overall selection of font types, sizes, colors, etc., is limited, leading to less customization.
Limited Offline Access - Unlike Google Docs, you cannot edit documents offline in Dropbox Paper. This becomes problematic in instances where the user doesn’t have an internet connection.
No Integrated Spreadsheets or Presentations - Whilst Google Docs is part of a suite which includes Google Sheets and Google Slides, Dropbox Paper only focuses on word processing, meaning users can't easily switch to making a presentation or creating a spreadsheet within the same platform.
Somewhat Invisible Comments - In Dropbox Paper, comments are slightly hidden. They are visible on the side, but not readily apparent on the text itself. In comparison, Google Docs comments are clearly visible on the margin besides the related text.
Limited Compatibility - Dropbox Paper's compatibility with different file types is inferior to Google Docs. For example, it does not offer an option for exporting a document to the .docx format, somewhat limiting its interoperability with Word and other similar programs.

Pick #5


Etherpad is an open-source, web-based collaborative real-time editor, which allows multiple users to edit a document simultaneously. Unlike Google Docs, which is a proprietary platform owned by Google, Etherpad can be self-hosted, meaning you can install it on your own server, ensuring full control over your data and avoiding potential privacy concerns. It offers several features similar to Google Docs, such as real-time document collaboration, version control, and text formatting, and also supports importing and exporting documents from various formats including Word, PDF, and plain text.

Real-Time Collaboration: Etherpad allows simultaneous editing and collaboration on text documents in real-time, spontaneously generating updates on every user's screen.
Open Source: Unlike Google Docs, Etherpad is open-source, meaning users can modify and customize the core software to fit specific use cases or to integrate it into existing workflows.
Data Ownership: Etherpad allows users to host the software on their own servers. This means users physically own and control the data, in comparison to Google Docs where data is stored on Google's servers.
Infinite Revisions and Playback: Etherpad has built-in robust document history features. It allows users to access infinite revisions and playback, allowing participants to see the creation process of the document sequentially.
Language Support: Etherpad supports a multitude of languages which makes it a more accessible option for non-English speakers, as opposed to Google Docs which is largely English-centric.
Lack of Sophisticated Formatting Plus Editing: Etherpad has very basic text editing functionalities as compared to Google Docs that offers a wide range of advanced editing options including fonts, paragraph formatting, and styles etc.
No Built-in Spelling And Grammar Checks: Unlike Google Docs, Etherpad doesn't provide automatic spell check or grammar check features. This can lead to more errors in a document.
Absence of Offline Capabilities: Google Docs has the ability to be used offline, thereby making it very accessible. Etherpad, on the other hand, doesn't have an offline mode.
Unavailability to Embed Non-Text Elements: Unlike Google Docs, Etherpad doesn't support the ability to embed non-text elements like images, videos, or even different types of charts.
Lack of Extensive Collaboration Tools: Google Docs offers a host of collaboration tools including real-time collaborative editing, the feature to leave comments, and to manage tasks among the team. Etherpad, on the other hand, lacks these extensive collaborative features.

Pick #6


ONLYOFFICE is a comprehensive suite of business-oriented software tools that serve as a viable alternative to Google Docs. It includes online document editors, a platform for document management, corporate communication, mail and project management tools. ONLYOFFICE provides a more desktop-like interface and supports a wider range of document formats compared to Google Docs. It’s particularly popular among businesses due to its high level of compatibility with Microsoft Office file formats, advanced feature set, and the ability to deploy on-premises. OnlyOffice also ensures the security of your data with an advanced encryption technology, making it an excellent choice for individuals and teams who prioritize privacy.

Advanced Formatting Options: ONLYOFFICE maintains the original formatting of documents better than Google Docs, which can often alter styles and layouts. This includes maintaining headers, footers, page numbering, and more.
Offline Access: ONLYOFFICE doesn't require a constant internet connection. You can work on your documents offline and have them automatically sync once you're back online.
Compatibility: ONLYOFFICE uses the standard ISO document formats DOCX, XLSX, and PPTX as basic, ensuring interoperability with all major office suites.
Integration Capabilities: ONLYOFFICE can be integrated directly into your own private network, allowing for easy collaboration without the need to transfer files externally.
Document Security: While both platforms are secure, ONLYOFFICE has an edge with its use of Blockchain technology for passwordless authentication of documents.
Compatibility Issues: ONLYOFFICE sometimes may not be fully compatible with other popular formats like Google Docs or Microsoft Office. This can lead to formatting issues when importing or exporting documents.
Interface Learning Curve: The interface of ONLYOFFICE can be less intuitive and user-friendly compared to Google Docs for some users. This can lead to a higher learning curve for new users.
Less Robust Collaboration Features: While ONLYOFFICE does offer real-time collaboration, its features are not as robust or seamless as Google Docs. It is less efficient when multiple users are editing a document simultaneously.
Limited Integration Support: ONLYOFFICE does not integrate as well with third-party apps or services as Google does with its suite of products. This can limit productivity and workflow efficiency for users who rely on specific tools for their tasks.
Performance Issues: Compared to Google Docs, ONLYOFFICE may experience performance issues when dealing with larger documents or spreadsheets. This can lead to slower loading times and decreased productivity.

Pick #7


Nuclino is a unified workspace solution that presents an effective Google Docs alternative. Known for its intuitive and collaborative interface, Nuclino provides teams with a platform where they can create, organize, and collaborate on multiple documents and projects in real-time, much like Google Docs. However, it stands out for its visual representation of team work, clean, distraction-free editor, hierarchical content structure, and interconnected documents, that use internal linking and referencing. It also offers advanced features, including real-time editing, version history, advanced search, and markdown support, making it ideal for teams looking for a holistic workspace that extends beyond mere document editing and sharing.

Integrated Knowledge Base - Unlike Google Docs, Nuclino serves as a centralized digital workspace where teams can collaborate, store, and access important information, acting as a unified knowledge base in addition to a document editing platform.
Hierarchical Structure – Nuclino offers a hierarchical structure where documents can be categorized and nested more organically compared to Google docs where you primarily work with individual documents.
Built-In Collaborative Tools - Beyond sharing and simultaneously working on documents, Nuclino provides team collaboration tools, such as commenting and task assigning that Google Docs doesn’t offer in the same integrated manner.
Visual Representation - Unlike Google Docs, Nuclino offers a visual representation of all documents and their correlations. Its "Graph view" delivers a bird's eye view of all your content and its interconnections.
Easy Linking Between Documents - In Nuclino, users can easily link between documents within the platform, creating a network of information unlike Google Docs where external links generally point to other websites or resources.
Limited real-time collaboration capabilities: While Nuclino allows for document collaboration, it doesn't have as robust of real-time co-editing features as Google Docs. This could slow down collaborative efforts if team members have to wait for others to finish editing before they can contribute.
Absence of built-in chat or comment functions: Unlike Google Docs, Nuclino doesn't have a built-in chat or a comment feature for discussions within the document. Teams may need to use other platforms for discussions which can be inconvenient.
Limited file formats: Nuclino primarily allows users to produce content in markdown format whereas Google Docs supports multiple file formats. This may limit the user's ability to create diverse documents like presentations and excel sheets.
No offline mode: Unlike Google Docs, Nuclino doesn't have an offline mode. This means you can't access or edit your documents without Internet access, which could be a significant drawback for users with inconsistent or limited Internet connections.
Absence of built-in grammar and spell checks: Nuclino lacks Google Docs' sophisticated spell check and grammar suggestion tools. Users might have to resort to other tools for proofreading which can disrupt the workflow and productivity.

Pick #8


ProWritingAid is an advanced writing assistant app that offers many features that make it a strong alternative to Google Docs for those who need more in-depth writing assistance. While Google Docs has basic spelling and grammar check options, ProWritingAid provides a more comprehensive suite of tools including grammar and style suggestions, word explorer, readability analysis, and a plagiarism detector. It also offers detailed reports that can enhance the writer’s understanding of their writing and make it more impactful. This software can integrate with various platforms, including Google Docs, for a more seamless writing experience.

Advanced Grammar and Style Checking: ProWritingAid goes beyond basic spell checking and grammar errors; it can analyze your document for style errors, redundant words, or unclear phrasing, which provides comprehensive feedback about your writing.
In-depth Writing Reports: ProWritingAid offers 20+ in-depth writing reports, from readability analysis to sentence length, to help you understand how to improve your writing. Google Docs does not offer this level of detailed writing feedback.
Contextual Thesaurus and Word Explorer: With ProWritingAid, you can explore synonym suggestions that fit your document's context. Google Docs lacks this advanced feature, which can help enhance vocabulary and add depth to your writing.
Realtime Editing: ProWritingAid offers a real-time editing panel, where you can make changes while receiving immediate feedback, a feature that Google Docs does not offer. This helps writers improve their text more efficiently.
Integration with other Software: ProWritingAid can be integrated with Microsoft Word, Open Office, Scrivener and other writing software, providing real-time grammatical and style corrections. Google Docs, however, is primarily a stand-alone platform with limited integration.
ProWritingAid, unlike Google Docs, doesn't provide any real-time collaboration feature which is one of the most significant features of Google Docs and extremely beneficial for team-based projects.
Google Docs offers better cloud-based storage integration with Google Drive for easy access and editing of files from any device with internet connectivity. In contrast, ProWritingAid doesn't offer such seamless integration making document storage and accessibility a bit tedious.
ProWritingAid fundamentally operates as a writing tool and not a word processor, therefore it lacks several functionalities like adding images, tables or graphs directly to the text that can be done on Google Docs.
In Google Docs one can easily make changes to the shared documents and these changes can be seen by others in real time, while in ProWritingAid, the same feature might not be as efficient and instantaneous.
The Google Docs has a user-friendly UI, making it suitable for both advanced and novice users alike, whereas ProWritingAid holds a bit more complicated UI, which can be somewhat difficult for novice users to navigate.

Pick #9

Apple iWork

Apple iWork is a suite of productivity applications developed by Apple Inc., offering a free and efficient alternative to Google Docs. Comprising of Pages (an alternative for Google Docs), Numbers (for Google Sheets), and Keynote (for Google Slides), iWork provides a seamless experience for document creation, data manipulation, and presentation design. It’s deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem, allowing for iCloud-based document storage and flawless syncing across Apple devices. Though it lacks some advanced features found in Google’s suite, iWork emphasizes sleek design, user-friendly interface, and robust multimedia integration, making it a suitable choice for those prioritizing aesthetics, simplicity, and built-in Apple interoperability.

Seamless Integration with Apple Ecosystem - Apple iWork is natively built for Apple devices which allows for better integration and smoother performance on Mac, iPhone, iPad devices compared to Google Docs.
Offline capabilities - Apple iWork applications can be used offline as they do not need an internet connection for creating, editing or saving documents, which could be more restrictive with Google Docs.
Advanced Design and Editing Tools - iWork's Pages, Numbers, and Keynote offer more advanced design features, layout options and editing tools than Google Docs, giving end-users more flexibility and control over their work.
Collaboration Experience - Apple iWork offers real-time collaboration, much like Google Docs, but it also provides an option to see who else is viewing or editing the document, along with their cursors, which can enhance the collaboration experience.
Keynote – While Google has Slides and Microsoft has PowerPoint, Keynote frequently gets better reviews for its ease of use, advanced features, and quality of design elements which make presentations pop, which makes it a potential draw for those considering iWork as an alternative to Google Docs.
Platform limitation - Unlike Google Docs that works on any device with a web browser, Apple iWork is limited mainly to Apple devices. It is more challenging to use on Windows and other non-Apple platforms.
No real-time collaboration outside of Apple ecosystem - While Apple iWork does support real-time collaboration, it requires all users to have an Apple ID. This isn’t required with Google Docs that allows easy collaboration with users irrespective of their platform.
Limited features - Google Docs has some advanced features like the Explore tool, which allows users to carry out research and find images without leaving the document. Apple iWork lacks similar innovative features.
No native Google Drive integration - Apple iWork doesn't offer seamless integration with Google Drive, one of the most popular cloud storage services. This can hinder smooth workflow and productivity, particularly when sharing files with Google Drive users.
Formatting concerns with imported documents - Apple iWork can open and edit Microsoft Office documents but there might be formatting issues during the import process, unlike Google Docs that maintains most of the original formatting.

Pick #10

WPS Office

WPS Office is a comprehensive office suite offering a range of solutions for document creation, presentation design, spreadsheet management, and more. As an alternative to Google Docs, WPS Office provides a highly compatible, feature-packed option, supporting various formats like DOCX, XLSX, PPT, PDF. It offers both cloud and desktop versions, assuring seamless integration across devices. It comes with extras like over hundreds of free templates and advanced text, paragraph, and shape formatting options. WPS Office’s free version comes with ads, but a premium subscription removes ads and tosses in bonus PDF tools, making it a versatile, cost-effective Google Docs alternative.

Richer Feature Set: WPS Office comes with in-depth features that Google Docs might not offer. It integrates with a word processor, spreadsheet software, and presentation software, offering a broader scope of capabilities.
Better Compatibility with Microsoft Office: WPS Office supports all file types used by Microsoft Office; this makes it an excellent alternative for those who need to work with Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files frequently.
Robust PDF Capabilities: WPS Office comes with integrated PDF functions, allowing you to convert documents into PDFs, as well as to modify and merge them. This feature is less readily available in Google Docs.
Offline Availability: Unlike Google Docs, WPS Office does not require an internet connection to operate, making it more flexible in terms of availability and usability irrespective of the network condition.
Tabbed Interface: WPS Office supports multi-tab functionality, permitting users to open multiple documents in the same window, something that is not supported in Google Docs. This enhances ease of use and multi-tasking capabilities.
Limited Collaboration - WPS Office does not support real-time collaborative editing which is one of the key features of Google Docs.
Absence of Cloud Autosave - Unlike Google Docs, WPS Office doesn't automatically save all changes to a cloud storage, which could lead to data loss if a device crashes or disconnects.
Incompatibility Issues - Often, WPS Office struggles with formatting issues when dealing with Microsoft Office documents, which Google Docs handles more gracefully.
Less Intuitive User Interface - While both platforms are user-friendly, Google Docs offers a more intuitive interface, reducing the learning curve for new users. WPS Office might take some time to get used to.
Limited Offline Capabilities – For WPS Office, there is no support for offline access and document editing unlike Google Docs, restricting the productivity when no internet connection is available.


What are some popular alternatives to Google Docs?

Some popular alternatives to Google Docs include Microsoft Word, Zoho Docs, Quip, Notion, and Etherpad.

Why should someone consider an alternative to Google Docs?

Alternatives to Google Docs can offer different features including increased formatting options, better offline usability, and compatibility with different file types. Also, privacy concerns can lead people to seek alternatives to Google’s services.

How does Microsoft Word compare to Google Docs?

Although Google Docs is free and allows for real-time collaboration, Microsoft Word has more sophisticated formatting features and is often used in professional settings. Additionally, Word offers offline access without needing to enable it first.

Are the alternatives to Google Docs free?

Not all alternatives to Google Docs are free. Microsoft Word, for example, requires a Microsoft 365 subscription. However, some alternatives like Zoho Docs and Etherpad do offer free versions.

Can I collaborate in real-time with alternatives like I can in Google Docs?

Some alternatives, like Microsoft Word (using OneDrive or SharePoint) and Quip, allow for real-time collaboration similar to Google Docs. However, the functionality and ease of use may vary between platforms.

Top 10: Best Google Docs Alternatives