Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Google Calendar Alternatives

The 10 Best Google Calendar Alternatives provide users with diverse options for managing their schedules, featuring platforms like Microsoft Outlook, Apple Calendar, Cozi Family Organizer, and others known for their unique functionalities and user-friendly interfaces.

Learn more about our top picks for: Google Calendar Alternatives

Microsoft Outlook, part of the Office 365 suite, is a robust Google Calendar alternative. It offers detailed calendar views with integrated tasks, email, contacts, and more. Other alternatives include Apple Calendar which is a native scheduling tool for those in the Apple ecosystem, offering seamless syncing across iOS devices. Zoho Calendar is a part of Zoho Workplace, featuring excellent sharing capabilities and the option to publish calendars on a website. Also worth mentioning is, a to-do list app that includes calendar functions, and Fantastical 2 offering advanced features like multiple time zones support, geo-mapping of events, etc., particularly favored by Mac users.

The Best Products

Our Recommendations: Google Calendar Alternatives

Pick #1

Microsoft Outlook

Microsoft Outlook is a comprehensive personal information manager that functions as one of the prime alternatives to Google Calendar. Apart from basic features such as calendar, scheduling, task, and contact management, it offers seamless integration with other Microsoft Suite products, like Word, Excel, and Powerpoint, enhancing its utility for professional usage. Its ability to synchronize with multiple devices and platforms, rich customization options, advanced search capabilities, and robust security measures like automatic deactivation of unsafe links and detection of suspicious attachments give it a distinct edge. Additionally, Microsoft Outlook’s superior resource booking and meeting room scheduling features make it a solid Google Calendar alternative, especially for business-centered applications.

Integrated with Microsoft Suite: Microsoft Outlook is fully integrated with the Microsoft suite, making it relatively easier to connect with other Microsoft applications like Word, Excel, and Powerpoint. If you're already using these tools for your daily tasks, Outlook will fit seamlessly into your workflow,
Advanced Email Organizing: Not just a calendar, Outlook also optimizes email experience by allowing categorization, flagging, and creating rules for routing and organizing emails. This can significantly improve productivity and task management,
Meeting Insights: Outlook offers meeting insights for users - a feature that brings related emails and documents pertaining to a meeting to the surface. This means you'll have all necessary content readily available in preparation for your meeting,
Time Zone Flexibility: Microsoft Outlook excels in handling multiple time zones. It can display up to three time zones side by side in calendar view. This becomes extremely useful for scheduling team meetings involving members from different geographical locations,
Compatibility: Since Microsoft Outlook is widely used in corporate environments, meetings and other calendar events are easily accessible and rarely have compatibility issues. Even if other participants are not using Outlook, it has wide compatibility with other calendaring software.
User Interface: The interface of Microsoft Outlook can be quite complex and less user-friendly compared to Google Calendar. It can take time for new users to navigate and find necessary components or features.
Integration with Other Apps: While Outlook has good integration with other Microsoft products, it may not integrate as well with non-Microsoft apps. Google Calendar, however, integrates excellently with most third-party apps, including many CRM systems, project management apps, and team collaboration tools.
Features Availability: Some features that are readily available and easy to use in Google Calendar, such as "add a reminder," "add a task," or "find a time," might be not as straightforward in Microsoft Outlook.
Accessibility: Google Calendar is easily accessible from any device with no setup needed, as it's web-based and mobile-ready from the get-go. In contrast, Microsoft Outlook requires configuration setup before you can start using it, especially on mobile devices.
Collaboration: Comparatively, Google Calendar excels further in real-time collaboration and sharing features. Scheduling, adjusting shared events, or sharing fullscreen in Google Calendar is generally more straightforward than in Outlook.

Pick #2

Apple Calendar

Apple Calendar is an efficient scheduling and time-management tool provided by Apple, which serves as a viable alternative to Google Calendar. This application, available on iOS and macOS devices, supports features such as event and appointment integration, sharing and subscribing to calendars, iCloud integration for real-time syncing across all Apple devices, and even synchronizing with other calendar services. Its streamlined, user-friendly interface with added customization options puts it on par with Google Calendar. Although it may be less flexible for non-Apple users, it’s an excellent choice for those fully invested in the Apple ecosystem.

Seamless Integration with Apple Ecosystem: If you're already using Apple's suite of devices and applications, Apple Calendar will integrate smoothly with your existing setup. It works flawlessly across iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, and Mac, providing a unified calendar view for both personal and professional events.
Siri Compatibility: Apple Calendar also benefits from direct integration with Siri, making event creation or reminders as simple as talking to your device. This can be particularly useful for hands-free use or if you're on the move.
Time to Leave Alerts: Apple Calendar offers a "time to leave" feature. It calculates when you should depart for your next appointment based on current traffic conditions. This is extremely useful in planning your day and preventing late arrivals.
Rich Event Creation: Apple Calendar supports adding attachments to events, which could be useful for meetings where documents are to be discussed. It also allows for more complex repeating events, catering to many different schedules.
Visual Customization: Apple Calendar offers better customization options for event categorization and visualization. For instance, you can use different colors to distinguish between work and personal events. Also, the app offers an array of view options from daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly, enabling users to view their schedule in the format best suited to them.
Limited Cross-Platform Functionality: Apple Calendar primarily works seamlessly on Apple devices. If you're using it as an alternative to Google Calendar, which is platform-neutral, you might face challenges in accessing or synchronizing your calendar with non-Apple devices, including Android phones and Windows desktops.
Inferior Collaboration Features: Google Calendar comes with robust collaboration features such as creating and sharing multiple calendars, meeting scheduling, and real-time updates. While Apple Calendar does offer these features, they are often regarded as less intuitive and less powerful, particularly for larger teams or more complex scheduling needs.
Lack of Integration with Wider Range of Third-Party Apps: Unlike Google Calendar, the integration capability of Apple Calendar with other third-party apps is limited. Google Calendar can integrate with a broader range of applications, thereby offering greater flexibility in personalizing and enhancing your scheduling and reminder systems.
Complex Shared Calendar Management: If you often share your calendar with others, you may find Apple Calendar's shared functions more complicated to manage than Google Calendar. Google Calendar provides more straightforward and precise settings for permissions and privacy when it comes to shared calendars.
Lack of Convenient Web App: Google Calendar’s web interface is highly convenient for users who switch between devices or don't always have their own device on hand. Apple Calendar, however, requires iCloud to access its web-based version, which can be less convenient for those who prefer a simple browser-based access option.

Pick #3 is a highly recommended alternative to Google Calendar, primarily functioned as an application for task management. It offers all basic scheduling features and emphasizes on helping users stay organized and improve their productivity. Not only does it serve as a calendar but also as a to-do list app where users can create, organize and prioritize their tasks efficiently. Inclusive of features such as the integration with other apps, time and location-based reminders, attaching files to tasks, sharing tasks and lists with others, it provides a well-rounded solution for time management needs. This cross-platform support gives a competitive edge over Google Calendar, providing a more comprehensive approach towards personal and professional task management. provides task-focused features that allow you to not only set events but also define tasks, which makes it more manageable for people who work with to-do lists in addition to calendar events.
Using, you can add tasks with voice entry, meaning you do not have to manually type them into your calendar. This feature stands out as a user-friendly function as compared to Google Calendar. offers seamless integration with several productivity apps like Slack, Trello, Gmail, and more. This broad set of app integrations can provide a more unified experience for users. offers a Moment Feature, which helps plan the daily schedule more efficiently. This feature provides a brief overview of the day's tasks every morning, which Google Calendar does not natively provide. has the capability to sync across all devices including Desktop, Web, Mobile or smart watch. That makes it ideal for users who want to manage their tasks and schedules across multiple platforms all at once.
Limited Collaboration Features: When compared to Google Calendar, lacks in terms of collaborative features. You cannot easily share calendars, event details, or manage meetings with others, in contrast to Google's built-in RSVP and booking system.
Inconsistencies across platforms:’s user experience can differ greatly across platforms, meaning the Android version could be vastly different from the iOS or web version. This contrasts Google Calendar’s smooth synchronization across all platforms.
Customization Constraints: isn't as customizable as Google Calendar when it comes to calendar views. Users can only view one day at a time or a rolling week, while Google provides daily, weekly, monthly, and agenda views.
Integration Shortcomings: If users rely on Google’s suite of apps for productivity, may not integrate as well with these services as Google Calendar does. For instance, it doesn’t integrate with Google Tasks and Google Keep.
Absence of Video Conferencing Feature: Unlike Google Calendar, doesn’t have an in-built function to add video conferencing options (like Google Meet) to the events, which during times of remote work, could count as a considerable downside.

Pick #4

Zoho Calendar

Zoho Calendar is a proficient alternative to Google Calendar. It is a web-based calendar application developed by Zoho Corporation, facilitating both business and personal scheduling needs in a single well-organized platform. Users can effortlessly manage appointments, schedule meetings, send invitations, and share their calendars to enhance work collaboration or project planning. Importantly, Zoho Calendar offers seamless integration with other Zoho suite applications like Zoho Mail and Zoho CRM, creating a more comprehensive information and task management system. Although its interface slightly differs from Google Calendar, its wide range of customization features, application integrations, and robust privacy settings makes it an excellent substitute.

Enhanced Integration with Zoho Suite – Zoho Calendar has the added advantage of being a part of the Zoho Suite. This means it can seamlessly integrate with other Zoho apps such as Zoho CRM, Mail, Docs, and Projects, providing a comprehensive and unified user experience.
Refugee Event Scheduling – Unlike Google Calendar, Zoho Calendar has a feature called 'Event Blueprint' which sets a standard procedure for event scheduling. This ensures consistency and eliminates the risk of errors or missed steps, making the scheduling process easier and smoother.
Customizable Viewing Options – Zoho Calendar offers a range of customizable viewing options. Users can choose to view their calendar by day, week, month, or in an agenda format. It also provides work-week and 7-day week views. Google Calendar also has multiple view options but Zoho offers more flexibility.
Smart Add Feature - Zoho Calendar has a 'Smart Add' feature which allows users to create events by simply typing a natural language sentence, making it quicker and more intuitive to add new entries compared to Google Calendar.
Community Sharing - Zoho Calendar excels in its community sharing features. Users can easily publish calendars to the entire network, a specific group, or make it public. This makes it particularly useful for businesses that need to share calendar information with a large number of people.
Limited Integration Options: Zoho Calendar does not support numerous third-party integrations like Google Calendar does. This could be problematic for users who rely on these integrations for productivity or workflow enhancement.
Difficult to Manage Multiple Calendars: Google Calendar allows easy management of multiple calendars under one account which is essential for managing different aspects of one's life or multiple teams in an organization. Zoho Calendar lacks this capability, making managing multiple calendars a bit difficult.
Less User-friendly Interface: While Google Calendar has a very intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, Zoho Calendar's interface can be complicated and less user-friendly. This could negatively impact the overall user experience.
Lack of Offline Access: Google Calendar offers functionality to access and edit your calendar while offline, which gets synced once you are online. Zoho Calendar, however, lacks this functionality, causing disruptions when there's poor or no internet connectivity.
Less Efficient Handling of Recurring Events: Google calendar allows users to manage recurring events more seamlessly, Zoho Calendar's capabilities in handling recurring events are not as proficient. This could cause some inefficiency in scheduling or tracking repetitive events or tasks.

Pick #5


Fantastical is a highly renowned alternative to Google Calendar, designed specifically for Apple users. It boasts an intuitive interface coupled with superior functionality that makes organizing schedules seamless. One of its standout features is its natural language parsing capability that simplifies the task of creating events. It also offers a menubar widget for quick access, reminders, to-dos, time zone support, and more. Using iCloud, Dropbox, or other accounts, you can sync events across iOS and Mac devices. Many users find its rich feature set and user experience to be worth the investment over Google’s free offering.

Enhanced Integration: Fantastical supports integration with other apps and services beyond Google like iCloud, Office 365, Exchange, Todoist, and more. This makes it a very efficient and convenient tool for users who have various online accounts.
Natural Language Processing: One significant benefit of Fantastical is its ability to accurately understand and process natural language inputs when you're scheduling events. This can make creating new calendar entries faster and more efficient than Google Calendar.
Multiple Views: Fantastical offers multiple calendar views (day, week, month, and year), along with a list view, which provides users with the flexibility to manage their schedule in the way that suits them best.
Interactive Notifications: Unlike Google Calendar, Fantastical provides interactive notifications. This allows users to respond to or snooze calendar alerts directly from the notification, making it more user-friendly.
Calendar Sets: Fantastical permits the creation of Calendar Sets based on locations or specific work modes. For instance, you can have a separate calendar set for 'Work' and another for 'Home.' This isn't available on Google Calendar without using additional tools or add-ons.
Limited integration: Fantastical doesn't integrate with as many other applications as Google Calendar. For instance, it doesn't have built-in integration with project management tools, which may create inefficiencies for users who rely on these apps.
Compatibility issues: Fantastical is designed mainly for Apple devices and its functionality on Android and Windows platforms is not as seamless as Google Calendar's. Thus, it may not be the best choice for individuals or teams who use a mixture of different operating systems.
Lack of collaborative features: Fantastical doesn't have robust team collaboration features like shared calendar and real-time calendar updating that are found on Google Calendar, posing limitations for team-based scheduling.
No web version: Unlike Google Calendar, Fantastical does not have a browser-based version. If a user doesn't have their device with them, they may not be able to access their calendar.
Less intuitive for inexperienced users: The user interface of Fantastical can be quite complex and less intuitive than Google Calendar, which may pose a challenge for less tech-savvy users.

Pick #6

Jorte Calendar

Jorte Calendar is a popular Google Calendar alternative designed for seamless planning and organization. It is a highly customizable app, renowned for its flexibility and usability, making it a favorite among individuals and businesses who prefer thorough tailoring to match their specific needs. Jorte offers several unique features not available in Google Calendar, such as countdown features, diary functions, and a collaboration function for shared calendars. It also integrates with other electronics to ensure continuity across devices, supports multiple themes, icons, and fonts, and the cloud sync feature allows users to access their calendar from any device.

Flexible Layout and Themes: Jorte Calendar offers a higher degree of customization than Google Calendar, allowing you to personalize the look and feel according to your preference. It comes with various view styles and customizable themes, which can help you see your schedule in a way that works best for you.
Diary Feature: Unlike Google Calendar, Jorte Calendar allows you to write a diary directly in the calendar. This is a unique feature that lets you record thoughts, memos, or observations for any particular day, and could be beneficial to those who like to keep an all-in-one digital journal.
Advanced Sorting Options: Jorte Calendar provides more extensive and detailed sorting options like you can sort events by category, priority, and even add a task as an event. Google Calendar does not offer these advanced features.
Event and Task Manager: Jorte Calendar combines your events and tasks into a single seamless interface. This is different from Google Calendar, where you'd need to use a separate app like Google Tasks to get a similar functionality.
Countdown feature: The countdown feature, which is unavailable in Google Calendar, on Jorte allows you to see how many days are left before an event. This can be especially useful for staying aware of upcoming deadlines or important dates.
Limited Integration: Jorte Calendar does not have as wide a range of integration capabilities as Google Calendar. While Google Calendar can effortlessly sync with various applications and platforms, Jorte struggles with some integrations, which may limit its efficiency in a multi-app environment.
Complex User interface: While Google Calendar maintains simplicity in design and usage, Jorte Calendar has a more complex interface that might be difficult to navigate especially for new users. This could make task scheduling and monitoring more challenging.
Less efficient event sharing: Sharing an event from Jorte to other applications or users is not as straightforward as Google Calendar. In Google Calendar, you can easily share an event with just an email address, while Jorte may require more steps or have limitations.
Sub-optimal reminders: Although Jorte provides event alerts and reminders, they aren't as powerful and intuitive as those on Google Calendar. Google Calendar allows for much more flexibility in setting up and customizing reminders.
Cross-platform consistency: Jorte Calendar displays and functions may vary somewhat between different platforms (iOS, Android, etc.), unlike Google Calendar, which maintains a consistent look and feel across all devices. This could potentially disrupt a user's workflow when switching between different devices.

Pick #7


TimeTree is a free-to-use mobile application and Google Calendar alternative that allows users to coordinate and share their schedules with family members, friends, or colleagues. With TimeTree, it’s possible to create multiple calendars for different aspects of a user’s life, such as work, personal, shared household chores, or event planning. Its collaborative features make it easier to schedule appointments or organize events by permitting all involved parties to propose and vote on dates or times. Notifications of all updates keep everyone in the loop, thus enhancing group coordination and time management.

Enhanced Collaboration Features: TimeTree has critical collaboration tools designed for users who manage shared calendars. It facilitates the ability to schedule and update events in a shared calendar in real time, which goes beyond Google Calendar's offering for collaborative scheduling.
Interactive Communication Tools: TimeTree has an integrated communication feature that lets you comment on specific events. You can discuss details related to an event right within the calendar. This is a functionality that Google Calendar does not intuitively provide.
Event-Based Feature: TimeTree allows you to create shared calendars for specific events. This can be particularly useful for organizing larger events that require extensive planning, as opposed to Google Calendar which focuses more on general calendar collaboration.
Compatible with a Variety of Platforms: TimeTree offers applications for web, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring that all team members can access the shared calendar, regardless of the device they are using.
Organized Views: TimeTree offers Keep, a dedicated space for managing event-specific to-do lists, photos, notes etc which add more context to the event. This allows for a more comprehensive view compared to Google Calendar.
Less Integration: TimeTree may not offer the same level of integration with other popular software and apps that Google Calendar provides. This can limit its usefulness in an ecosystem where other Google apps or third-party applications are frequently used.
Lower User-Friendly Interface: TimeTree has a different user interface compared to Google Calendar, which can be confusing or difficult for some users to navigate especially those familiar with the Google Calendar layout.
Limited Functionality: Compared to Google Calendar, TimeTree has limited functionality. Features like smart suggestions for meeting places or detailed customization of event colors, which are present in Google Calendar, are lacking in TimeTree.
Poor Offline compatibility: TimeTree's offline compatibility is not as strong as Google Calendar's. Changes made offline in Google Calendar are seamlessly synced once online, a capability which TimeTree lacks.
No Natural Language Processing: Google Calendar has a strong natural language processing capability that enables it to understand and create events from spoken or written sentences. TimeTree does not offer this advanced feature which can reduce its convenience and ease of use.

Pick #8


Asana is a robust project management tool that can serve as an alternative to Google Calendar, especially for teams handling complex projects. This platform provides a distinctive approach to time management and scheduling, where tasks and deadlines are sorted into projects, allowing users to engage with a clear picture of progress. It leverages visually intuitive layouts like lists, boards, timelines, and calendars. Asana’s calendar feature integrates seamlessly with other tools, allowing a real-time view of tasks, due dates and team responsibilities. Its capabilities beyond basic calendar functions, like commenting on tasks, attaching files, and setting reminders, make it a comprehensive solution for project management and team collaboration.

Task Organization and Prioritization - Asana allows users to create, assign, follow, and prioritize tasks all in one place. This functionality extends beyond what a traditional calendar application offers, providing a higher level of productivity management.
Project Progress Visualization - Asana provides features to track the progress of projects, enabling users to visualize goals, milestones, and deadlines. This assists in tracking the status of tasks and projects visibly, something usually not offered by Google Calendar.
Integration and Collaboration - Asana seamlessly integrates with other productivity and communication tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams etc, fostering better team collaboration. Whereas, Google Calendar’s collaboration features are more focused on scheduling than task management.
Customizable Workflows - Asana provides users with customizable workflows to match their project management styles, unlike Google Calendar which follows a basic date and time based structure.
Dedicated Project and Task Boards - Asana provides dedicated project and task boards that allow for better organization and understanding of upcoming tasks and their specifics. This gives users the ability to interact with the tasks in a more dynamic way, which isn’t possible in Google Calendar's event structure.
Asana lacks a native full calendar view, which makes scheduling a whole month's worth of tasks in a quick at-a-glance calendar quite difficult.,
Asana is primarily a project management tool; therefore, while one can set deadlines for tasks, it does not have classic calendar features such as setting appointments or invitations.,
The UI of Asana can feel cluttered when used as a calendar alternative, due to the multitude of project management features.,
With Asana, the integration with other tools like your email client is not as seamless as with Google Calendar, creating potential hurdles in a user's workflow.,
Unlike Google Calendar, Asana doesn't offer functions like shared calendars, or the ability to see when participants are free for meetings when scheduling them. This limitation could lead to scheduling conflicts.,

Pick #9

Toggl Plan

Toggl Plan is a comprehensive project management and team planning tool that serves as an alternative to Google Calendar. With a user-friendly interface and visually striking timeline view, it enables teams and individuals to track tasks, manage projects seamlessly, allocate resources, and establish timeline plans efficiently. It surpasses the simplicity of Google Calendar by providing dynamic features like task segmentations, color-coded timelines, drag and drop functionality, project milestone creation, and real-time progress tracking. While Google Calendar focuses on scheduling individual appointments, Toggl Plan shines in its capacity for comprehensive project management.

Enhanced Project Management: Toggl Plan provides more than just a calendar; it provides a visual representation of your entire project timeline which makes for efficient planning and prioritization.
Team Collaboration: Toggl Plan allows for easy team collaboration, as users can assign tasks, set deadlines, and monitor project progress all in one place, a feature that lacks in Google Calendar.
Task Segmentation: Toggl Plan allows you to break projects down into tasks and subtasks, which gives a detailed look at your project timeline and helps in managing complex projects.
Time Tracking: Toggl Plan has an integrated time tracking feature, which can help users to better understand how much time a task or project really takes, an improvement over Google Calendar's more event-focused tracking.
Color-coded Plans: Toggl Plan uses color coding for tasks and projects, making it easier to visually filter and organize work, a stark difference from Google Calendar's more uniform presentation.
Limited Integration Capabilities. Toggl Plan does not offer the same breadth of integration capabilities that Google Calendar does. It may not sync as effectively with other apps and services, which could disrupt workflows and productivity for organizations using a variety of different software tools.
Limited Sharing Options. In Toggl Plan, sharing plans and schedules can be more challenging, especially with individuals outside of the organization. Google Calendar shines with its ability to allow users to easily share calendars with anyone, and adjust viewing and editing permissions at will.
Absence of Detailed Event Features. Google Calendar allows you to add specific locations, guests, and detailed notes to each event, with granular notification controls. Toggl Plan, being project management and task-focused, doesn't have as robust event feature-set.
Differences in Use Case. Toggl Plan is primarily a project scheduling and management tool. While it can certainly be used to manage a calendar, its features and interface are not optimized for this purpose in the same way that Google Calendar is. Users seeking a straightforward calendar tool may find Toggl Plan overly complex or lacking in specific calendar features.
Lack of Offline Access. One major drawback of using Toggl Plan as a Google Calendar alternative is that you cannot access your plans without an internet connection. Whereas Google Calendar supports offline viewing and editing, this is currently not possible with Toggl Plan.

Pick #10


Woven is a powerful scheduling tool that serves as an alternative to Google Calendar. It provides several features that go beyond basic calendar management, aiming to simplify the process of scheduling meetings, events, and tasks. Woven integrates with Google Suite and Office 365, allowing for seamless synchronization of calendars across these platforms. It offers a variety of advanced scheduling features such as smart scheduling links, built-in event templates, group polls to choose available times, and integrated video conferencing. It also employs analytics functions to help users analyze their time and improve productivity.

Smart Templates: Woven offers smart templates that allow users to instantly schedule common meetings without going through the tedious process of inputting the same information repeatedly.
Scheduling Links: Woven provides scheduling links. You can share these links with the people you want to meet and they can pick a time that works for them, reducing the back-and-forth usually associated with scheduling.
Time-zone Friendly: Woven is time-zone friendly and is adept at managing events across different time zones seamlessly and avoiding scheduling conflicts.
Groups and Teams: Woven offers support for groups and teams, allowing multiple users to manage a single calendar with ease. This feature makes it a superior alternative when teamwork or group coordination is involved.
Built-in Analytics: Woven has built-in analytics which provide useful insights into how your time is spent. This is especially beneficial for productivity as it gives a clear glimpse of time allocation and usage.
Limited Integration: While Woven provides an impressive array of features, it lacks the deep integration mechanism with other applications that Google Calendar provides. This makes it a less effective tool in an ecosystem of apps that a user may already be utilizing.
No Multi-calendar Support: Unlike Google Calendar, Woven doesn't provide the ability to manage and view different calendars at the same time. This can be a major limitation for users who oversee different calendars for personal and professional reasons.
Lack of Offline Support: Woven, unlike Google Calendar, does not provide offline support, which can be a big disadvantage for users who might not always have access to internet.
Restricted Compatibility: Unlike Google Calendar, Woven is not compatible with all devices and platforms. At present, the application is only available for iOS, Mac, and Windows, and not yet available on platforms like Android.
Limited Scheduling influence: Woven lacks the capability to forcibly prevent scheduling during certain times. Although you can set your availability preferences, Woven doesn’t block other people from scheduling events during your "off" times. Google Calendar users have the edge of managing their calendar permissions.


What are some popular alternatives to Google Calendar?

Some popular alternatives to Google Calendar include Microsoft Outlook Calendar, Apple Calendar,, Fantastical 2 and Thunderbird.

Why might one prefer using alternatives to Google Calendar?

While Google Calendar is widely used, some people might prefer alternatives because of different user interfaces, better integration with other platforms they use, more customization options, or simply personal preference.

Do Google Calendar alternatives offer the same features?

Most calendar apps offer a similar set of basic features such as event creation, reminders, sharing calendars, and syncing across multiple devices. However, some may have unique features like advanced scheduling, task management, weather updates, or integration with other productivity apps.

Are Google Calendar alternatives usually free?

It varies. Many Google Calendar alternatives offer free versions which may have limitations on features or usage. For full access to all features, a paid version may be required. It’s always important to check the pricing model of each alternative.

Does every Google Calendar alternative have an app?

Most popular Google Calendar alternatives have mobile applications so you can manage your schedule on the go. However, it’s recommended to check if the app is available on your device’s operating system before deciding on an alternative.

Top 10: Best Google Calendar Alternatives