Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Zoho Meeting Alternatives

Explore a variety of innovative and reliable online meeting and collaboration tools that offer extensive features such as video conferencing, chat functionality, screen sharing, and advanced scheduling.

Learn more about our top picks for: Zoho Alternative

While Zoho Meeting is a reliable video conferencing software, offering features like screen sharing, recording, and calendar integrations, someone might look for an alternative due to a few limitations. Zoho Meeting’s user interface might not be intuitive for everyone, and users have reported occasional technical glitches during meetings, like audio and video issues. Plus, its features may not fully meet the requirements of larger teams or enterprises, effectively limiting the scope of collaboration. Other platforms may offer more robust security features, more advanced conferencing tools like breakout rooms or whiteboards, and better integration with other office software suites.

Why would you look for Zoho Alternative alternative?

Looking for an alternative to Zoho may arise from several compelling reasons. Primarily, businesses or individuals might find the platform’s pricing structure not aligning with their budget constraints or financial plans. The subscription models, although varied, can accumulate significant costs over time, especially for small businesses or startups keeping a tight rein on their expenses. Additionally, while Zoho offers a comprehensive suite of applications, some users might feel overwhelmed by its extensive feature set, seeking a solution that offers simplicity and focuses more keenly on the specific tools they require, without the added complexity of unused functionalities.

Another factor contributing to the search for a Zoho alternative could stem from user experience and customization limitations. Users who prioritize a highly intuitive interface and the ability to tailor the software extensively to fit their unique workflow might find Zoho’s customization options somewhat restrictive. Moreover, compatibility and integration with other tools or platforms already in use by a business could prompt the search for a different solution. Seamless integration is key to efficient operations, and any hurdles in this area might nudge users to consider alternatives that better serve their integration needs, ensuring a smoother, more efficient workflow overall.

The Best Products

Zoho Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, a cloud-based application for meeting notes, takes teamwork to another level by innovating how we create, organize, and share meeting notes. Its simultaneous note-taking feature, collaborative editing capacity, and compatibility with widely used calendars and productivity tools make it an absolute essential for teams, irrespective of their size.

One key highlight of ZipDo is the real-time note-taking capability, which fosters a coherent and unified understanding of discussions during meetings – say goodbye to the old-school manual note distribution. Once the meeting wraps up, team members can conveniently modify and add more details to the notes, promptly aligning with the most recent updates.

In the realm of manageability, ZipDo outshines by offering user-friendly categorization into various channels or folders. The software’s ability to search within notes boosts productivity, providing swift access to certain information, eliminating the pain of extensive scrolling or manual searching.

ZipDo’s customized access control mechanism in note sharing guarantees secure information delivery amongst colleagues, customers, or collaborators. Its seamless incorporation with calendars permits automatic generation of collaborative notes for each meeting, bidding farewell to time-consuming manual entries.

In conclusion, ZipDo is an intuitive software providing an all-inclusive range of features destined to boost team productivity, collaboration, and ultimately, project management. Its simultaneous note-taking, cooperative editing, advanced organization, searchability, secure sharing, and hassle-free integration qualities contribute to making it a non-negotiable tool, reshaping meeting management for more efficient project completion.

Pick #2 is a highly recognized platform for video conferencing, online meetings, chat, and mobile collaboration. As an alternative to Zoho Meeting, Zoom provides advanced features such as HD video and audio meetings with up to 1000 participants and 49 videos on a screen, breakout rooms for small-group discussions, the use of virtual backgrounds, and the ability to record and transcribe meetings. Zoom also includes features for webinars, chat, scheduling, and phone. Furthermore, Zoom’s integration capabilities with different applications and its innovative touch-up appearance feature set it apart. Therefore, Zoom provides a comprehensive, flexible, and user-friendly solution for various communication needs.

Superior Video and Audio Quality - Zoom offers top-notch video and audio quality for its video meetings, which guarantees clear and consistent communication.
Larger Participant Capacity - Zoom allows for up to 1000 video participants and 49 videos on screen, which makes it ideal for larger webinars and conferences, while Zoho Meeting supports a smaller participant capacity.
Advanced Screen Sharing - With Zoom, not only can users share their screens, but they can also annotate and co-annotate, which makes for interactive brainstorming sessions or presentations.
Virtual Background and Touch up (video settings) - Zoom provides options for virtual backgrounds and video touch-ups, allowing users to maintain a professional image or add a fun twist to their video calls.
Robust Integration Capabilities - Zoom's popularity has led to extensive integration with other software services including Microsoft Office 365, Google Calendar, Salesforce, among others, enabling seamless coordination and productivity.
One of the main disadvantages of using Zoom as a Zoho Meeting alternative is the lack of an integrated suite. While Zoho Meeting is part of a business suite which includes other collaboration tools like email, document management, chat, and more, Zoom is mainly a standalone video conferencing platform.
Zoom does not offer a built-in scheduling system. Zoho Meeting has a scheduling system for setting up meetings in advance, with tools for sending out invitations and reminders, whereas Zoom relies on external calendar systems.
Zoom may not be as user-friendly for new users as Zoho Meeting. While Zoom's interface is clean and intuitive, it has more settings and options that could be confusing for new users, especially compared to the simple and straightforward setup and usage of Zoho Meeting.
In Zoom, the controls disappear during the call unless you move the mouse to make them reappear, while Zoho Meeting has constant visibility of controls which may be more practical and convenient for some users.
Zoom requires users to download and install their software for the best experience. While there is a web app available, it offers limited features. However, Zoho Meeting runs entirely in-browser, allowing users to join meetings without needing to download any software.

Pick #3, previously known as GoToMeeting, is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that allows users to meet with other computer users, customers, clients, or colleagues via the internet in real time. As an alternative to Zoho Meeting, it offers HD video, screen sharing, and web conferencing features, providing a range of tools that can be integrated into platforms such as Microsoft Office and email clients. GoTo’s offerings also extend to Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS), and it is ideal for businesses of any size due to its scalable solutions, including options for webinars, training, conferencing, and providing IT support.

GoTo offers a complete suite of communication tools along with video conferencing, such as GoToWebinar, GoToTraining, GoToAssist and OpenVoice - providing more options for video conferencing and remote support sessions.
GoTo's HD video quality is superior. It provides clearer video conferencing, which enhances the user experience.
GoTo supports a larger number of attendees in a single meeting. This is beneficial for large-scale meetings or webinars.
GoTo has a more intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface which allows for easier setup and use, great for people who aren't as tech-savvy.
GoTo has better integration with Outlook. Users can schedule, manage meetings, and send invites directly from their Outlook calendar, increasing productivity and convenience.
GoToMeeting does not support recording of video conferences directly to the cloud, unlike Zoho Meeting. This can make storage and accessibility of meeting resources for post-meeting references challenging.
In terms of user interface, GoToMeeting might be a little bit complex for new users compared to Zoho Meeting's easy-to-use interface.
GoToMeeting does not offer an inbuilt productivity suite or CRM integration directly, unlike Zoho Meeting that is a part of Zoho's extensive productivity suite.
GoToMeeting has restrictions on numbers of participants, depending on the pricing plan, which can be seen as a disadvantage compared to Zoho Meeting's consistently higher participant numbers across all pricing plans.
GoToMeeting isn't as robust for global businesses as it doesn't offer multilingual support unlike Zoho Meetings, which offers the platform in multiple languages which can be advantageous for teams across different geographical locations.

Pick #4 is a comprehensive digital solution for video conferencing, online meetings, screen share, and webinars, similar to Zoho Meeting. Powered by Cisco Systems and established in 1995, Webex is widely recognized as a leading platform in the realm of collaboration technology. It is an excellent alternative to Zoho Meeting, offering advanced features like AI-powered meeting assistance, voice recognition, seamless screen sharing, high-quality video, and sophisticated security options. Additionally, Webex caters to a broader audience, providing solutions for education, healthcare, and various enterprise-level applications, which sets it apart as a versatile competitor in the video conferencing software market.

Integrated services: Webex offers a comprehensive solution that goes beyond online meetings, and includes services like training, webinars, support centers, and team collaboration. This can be an advantage for those looking for a complete package rather than just a meeting tool.
High-quality video: Webex provides HD video conferencing with crisp and clear resolution. This could create a more immersive meeting experience, vital for those dealing with detailed visuals.
Multilingual Support: Webex has a multilingual interface, catering to a global user base, while Zoho Meetings is predominantly English. This important for businesses operating in multiple regions.
Advanced Annotation Tools: Webex provides advanced annotation tools with a whiteboard feature, giving users the ability to highlight important points during presentations or meetings directly on the shared screen.
Superior Integration Capabilities: Webex integrates seamlessly with other business apps such as Salesforce, Slack, and Microsoft Teams, which can be a significant benefit for businesses that use these tools regularly. Webex's integration capabilities tend to be more advanced than Zoho's.
User Interface: Webex has a more complex user interface in comparison, making it more difficult for first-time users or those who are not technologically savvy. Zoho is more streamlined and user-friendly and takes less time to learn.
Integration Support: Zoho Meeting has a large number of integrations with the Zoho Suite and various third-party applications, which Webex lacks. If the team is already using Zoho Suite, it might be more seamless to stick with Zoho Meeting.
Recording Storage: Webex provides a limited amount of storage for recorded meetings. Zoho Meeting offers a much better policy in this regard, causing possible inconveniences for companies that often need to record their meetings or webinars.
Deeper Customization: While Webex offers decent customization options, it doesn't quite measure up to Zoho Meeting, which provides greater control over branding and customization of meeting URLs, emails, and more.
Social Media Streaming: With Zoho Meeting, you can live stream your meetings or webinars directly to YouTube, which is a function not available on Webex. For businesses that wish to reach larger audiences, this can be a notable disadvantage.

Pick #5

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams, available at https://www.Microsoft Teams, is a unified communication and collaboration platform that provides workplace chat, video meetings, and file storage within its product suite. As an alternative to Zoho Meeting, Microsoft Teams offers similar functionalities such as video conferencing, online meetings, and screen sharing, but goes further to integrate with other Microsoft 365 services like Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote, allowing for seamless collaboration and productivity within a single interface. Moreover, Teams has superior features for team collaboration including channels, chat capabilities, and app integration, enabling more streamlined project management and teamwork.

Enhanced Integration: Microsoft Teams provides deep integration with Office 365 applications. This allows users to easily work with familiar software such as Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook without leaving the Teams interface.
Collaboration-centric Design: Microsoft Teams is designed with collaboration at its core. The platform allows multiple people to work on the same document simultaneously, which can significantly improve teamwork and productivity.
Large-scale Communication: Microsoft Teams allows for larger meetings or webinars, with up to 10,000 participants for live events compared to a maximum of 100 participants in Zoho Meeting.
Hierarchical and Structured Channels: Teams offers a more structured way of managing workspace with sub-channels under teams. This helps in organizing and compartmentalizing different aspects of team discussions and projects.
Advanced features: Microsoft Teams offers advanced features such as background blur or virtual backgrounds during video calls, live captions, scheduling assistance, and recording meetings with transcript functionality, options which are not readily available in Zoho Meeting.
Microsoft Teams is tightly integrated with the rest of the Microsoft 365 suite, which can be a disadvantage for those who do not already use or prefer these tools. It may be difficult or less efficient to integrate Microsoft Teams with third-party applications compared to Zoho Meeting which is known for its compatibility with various other tools.
Microsoft Teams requires more system resources and has a more complex interface compared to Zoho Meeting, which is lightweight and user-friendly. This can lead to slower performance or a steeper learning curve for some users.
For audio and video conferencing, Microsoft Teams depends heavily on the user’s internet bandwidth. Zoho Meeting, on the other hand, is praised for its efficient utilization of bandwidth.
Zoho Meeting has in-built webinar functionality, unlike Microsoft Teams. If you want to host webinars through Microsoft Teams, you’ll have to use Microsoft Teams Live Events, which isn't as feature-rich or as straightforward to use as the webinar features in Zoho Meeting.
Microsoft Teams doesn't have built-in native CRM integrations like Zoho Meeting, which is a part of the Zoho suite of products that includes Zoho CRM. This can hinder productivity and workflow for businesses which heavily rely on CRM tools.

Pick #6, also known as Google Meet, is a robust video conferencing software tool from Google. It is a popular alternative to https://www.Zoho Meetings due to its seamless integration with other Google services like Google Calendar and Gmail, which makes scheduling and inviting participants to meetings a breeze. Like Zoho Meeting, Google Meet provides high-quality video conferencing and screen sharing, but stands out with features such as live captioning and its compatibility with multiple devices and browsers. Both free and paid versions offer a stable and accessible platform suitable for businesses of all sizes. However, choice between the two largely depends on the user’s preference for functionality and integration with other tools they might be using.

Integration with Google Workspace: Google Meet is fully integrated with Google Workspace which includes Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides etc. This allows seamless transition from email or document to a video call. While Zoho meeting also offers integrations, Google's ecosystem is more widely used and recognized, also providing a broader suite of integrated applications.
Live Captioning: Google Meet provides live captioning during meetings, which is an AI-powered feature that generates captions in real-time as participants speak. This can enhance accessibility for participants who are hard of hearing, or for whom English is not their first language.
Noise Cancellation: Google Meet includes an AI-powered noise cancellation feature, which can filter out background sounds like typing, door closing, or even a dog barking. This leads to a better quality audio experience for all participants in the call and ensures minor distractions do not interrupt a meeting.
Scalability: Google Meet can host larger meetings than Zoho Meeting. Google Meet can host up to 250 participants in a single meeting, whereas Zoho Meeting has a maximum limit of 100 participants.
Advanced Screening: Google Meet offers an advanced screening feature that allows hosts to admit participants into the meeting individually. This provides an added level of security and control to the host to prevent uninvited guests from joining a meeting.
Google Meet requires a Google account. While this may not seem like much of a hurdle given the ubiquity of Google accounts, it still is a requirement not present in Zoho Meeting. For users who do not use other Google services or prefer not to link their professional and personal accounts, this could be an issue.
Integration with other software. Although Google Meet integrates well with other Google Workspace tools, it may not offer the same level of integration as Zoho Meeting with other Zoho Suite products, which might be more beneficial for businesses already using Zoho products.
Google Meet doesn't have an in-built scheduling feature. Zoho Meetings, on the other hand, has integrated meeting scheduling features which allow users to arrange meetings from within the platform itself.
User Interface. Some users might find Google Meet's interface less user-friendly compared to Zoho Meeting. Zoho Meeting provides a simple and intuitive user interface, which is advantageous for less tech-savvy users.
Audio quality. Some users have noted that Google Meet often doesn't have the same level of crystal clear audio quality that Zoho Meeting offers, even on a good internet connection.

Pick #7

BlueJeans ( is a cloud-based video conferencing solution serving as an alternative to Zoho Meeting. It promises an interoperable and scalable conferencing solution, offering features such as screen sharing, recording, chat functionalities, and multi-vendor, multi-device compatibility. BlueJeans also provides enhanced security protocols and integrates with multiple business systems like Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Facebook WorkPlace making it a robust choice for businesses looking to foster virtual collaboration. So, while Zoho Meeting certainly carries its own strengths, BlueJeans represents an alternative option that may fit different needs and preferences.

Enhanced Interoperability: BlueJeans has the ability to connect with a wide range of cutting-edge video conferencing technologies. It also supports traditional H.323 and SIP devices, giving it an edge when transitioning from a different meeting software like Zoho Meeting.
Scalability: BlueJeans can handle a larger volume of participants compared to Zoho Meeting, allowing for more extensive conferencing options. It supports up to 50,000 attendees in a live event, making it preferred for large-scale virtual events and conferences.
Multi-Faceted Integration: BlueJeans provides more robust integration with other communication tools such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Facebook Workplace. This widens the scope for seamless communication and collaboration across platforms, which is especially useful in a hybrid working environment.
Dolby Voice Audio: BlueJeans' partnership with Dolby brings high-end, immersive sound for clearer conversations, reducing the audio issues that can sometimes plague virtual meetings. This is a significant advantage over Zoho Meeting, which doesn't offer the same audio quality.
Smart Meetings: This BlueJeans feature provides post-meeting analytics and insights, AI-powered highlights, and action item tags. This can significantly improve the follow-up process after a meeting, providing a better experience than Zoho Meeting, which provides less comprehensive post-meeting analytics.
BlueJeans primarily focuses on video conferencing whereas Zoho Meeting offers a more diversified range of options such as webinar functionalities which can be especially useful for online presentations, lectures or large-scale announcements.
BlueJeans doesn't integrate directly with Zoho CRM, unlike Zoho Meeting. This can make it more difficult to manage customer relationships and track interactions, especially for sales and customer service teams who primarily use Zoho suite for their operations.
BlueJeans, unlike Zoho Meetings, does not provide in-built audio conferencing. This might result in additional costs and complexity as you would need separate provisions for audio conferencing.
In terms of user interface and user experience, BlueJeans can be considered more complex due to the larger array of features and options. On the other hand, Zoho Meeting provides a simpler, more streamlined interface which can be easier to navigate for new or less tech-savvy users.
BlueJeans does not support as many languages as Zoho Meetings, which supports six languages. This can provide barriers for international teams or teams with diverse linguistic backgrounds who need to collaborate remotely.

Pick #8 is an innovative meeting platform designed to enhance the productivity and engagement of remote teams. Much like Zoho Meeting, it primarily offers video conferencing functionality, but distinguishes itself with additional tools aimed at making meetings more effective. These features include integrated agendas, collaborative note-taking, and the ability to turn conversations into actionable tasks. Further, it provides a unique tool that records and transcribes meetings, enabling team members to search through meeting content and review key points later. Thus, Vowel could be a compelling alternative to Zoho Meeting for those who seek a more comprehensive solution for managing virtual meetings.

Integrated Note-Taking - Vowel offers an integrated note-taking feature, which can be very beneficial in a meeting setup. It allows users to easily jot down important points or tasks in real time without needing to switch applications or screens.
Actionable Follow-Ups - Post-meeting, Vowel provides actionable follow-ups which helps ensure that everyone is on the same page and all tasks discussed in the meeting are accounted for and assigned appropriately.
Better Organization - With Vowel, every meeting can be categorized, tagged, and easily searchable. This makes it extremely easy to find specific meetings or topics discussed, something that can be quite cumbersome in other platforms like Zoho Meeting.
AI Powered Transcription – Vowel offers an AI powered transcription feature, which can transcribe audio conversations into text in real time. This level of automation can streamline meeting reviews and analysis when compared to Zoho Meeting.
Conversation Insights - Vowel provides conversation insights, which can foster self-improvement and effective team communication. It can show talk-to-listen ratios, interruptions, meeting efficiency and other metrics, which can be valuable pieces of information for team leaders and managers.
While both Vowel and Zoho Meeting are online communication tools, the specific drawbacks of using Vowel as a Zoho Meeting alternative could be as follows:
1. Vowel supports fewer integrations than Zoho Meeting. This can limit how seamlessly it can be incorporated into different organizations' existing digital environments.
2. Vowel doesn't appear to offer dial-in numbers for joining a meeting. This function is provided by Zoho Meeting, enabling participants to join the discussion even when they don’t have access to proper internet connection.
3. Vowel is arguably less versatile than Zoho Meeting in terms of deployment options. Zoho Meeting is available on both web and desktop, across various platforms including Linux, which is not supported by Vowel.
4. Zoho Meeting offers more than just video conferences; it also includes webinar features. This is not a part of Vowel, and as such may limit its use for companies looking to hold large-scale events online.
5. Zoho Meeting also comes with in-built email marketing features, allowing for the integration of meetings and webinars with marketing and CRM systems. This functionality might not be available with Vowel, thus possibly restricting meeting invitations, follow-ups, and overall interaction management.

Pick #9 is an innovative scheduling and video conferencing platform that offers an alternative to traditional video conferencing software like Zoho Meeting. It aims to streamline meeting scheduling by allowing users to share their availability and obtain meeting confirmations in real time. Besides scheduling, also provides seamless video conferencing feature with built-in capabilities such as high-definition video quality and screen sharing for better collaboration. While Zoho Meeting offers a broader range of functions, focuses on simplifying and enhancing the user experience primarily around meeting scheduling and execution, making it a suitable choice for those needing a streamlined and user-friendly platform for meetings.

Scheduling Simplicity: Claap's interface is direct and intuitive, making it easy to schedule meetings, a feature not as straightforward on Zoho Meeting.
Automated Meeting Summaries: Claap has unique capability of producing auto-generated summaries for meetings, saving time and effort, a feature not common in Zoho Meeting.
Synchronized Calendar Integration: Claap offers a more streamlined integration with major calendar services like Google Calendar and Outlook. Zoho Meeting, while it does offer such integration, can be more complex to navigate.
Time Zone Adaptability: Claap provides automatic time-zone conversions for international and remote teams, a level of automation not as efficiently handled by Zoho Meeting.
Simplified UI/UX: The user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) design of Claap is more modern and user-friendly compared to Zoho Meeting, which can result in a smoother user experience for participants.
Clarity and depth of features - While Zoho Meeting is a comprehensive tool with features like screen sharing, recording, moderator controls, polls and Q&A, Claap is relatively basic - prioritizing scheduled video meetings and instant calling. Users looking for a wide set of features might find Claap lacking.
Integration with other Zoho products - Zoho Meeting is a part of the Zoho suite of productivity tools. Therefore, it has better integration with other Zoho products like CRM, Projects, and Calendar. If a company is already using these Zoho products, using a Zoho Meeting might make more sense than switching to Claap.
Size Limitations - Claap is designed for smaller teams and might not be suitable for larger gatherings, workshops, or webinars on the same scale as Zoho Meeting, which can host up to 250 participants at a time.
Platform availability - Zoho Meeting is accessible via web browsers, desktop app, and mobile apps (iOS and Android). In contrast, Claap is currently available only as a web app and does not have options for iOS, Android, or desktop applications.
24/7 Support - Zoho offers 24/7 phone, email, and chat support, while Claap does not explicitly promise around-the-clock support. This difference might influence those who prioritize having immediate help at any time.

Pick #10


Loom is a video messaging tool that offers an alternative to traditional video conferencing software like Zoho Meeting. Instead of real-time communication, Loom allows users to record and share videos of their screen, voice, and face, enabling async communication. This feature makes it ideal for instructional videos, demonstrations, or quick explanations without having to schedule meetings. The recorded videos can be shared with a simple link. While Loom lacks features for interactive meetings such as screen sharing in real-time or a virtual whiteboard, its user-friendly interface and efficient video messaging system offers a unique and valuable spin on standard video communication tools.

Advanced Video Recording Capabilities: Loom stands out with its advanced video recording abilities. Users can record their screen, a specific application, or a tab in their browser. This is especially beneficial for making tutorials, demos, or bug reporting, which isn't offered at the same level in Zoho meetings.
Video Messaging: Loom allows you to create and share video messages which can be a more engaging and personal method of communication. This can foster better collaboration and enhance the effect of your communication compared to traditional text chats in Zoho meetings.
Video Editing Tools: Loom provides a rich set of tools to edit your videos directly from the platform, like trimming the start or end of a video, inserting a call to action, or adding custom thumbnails. These features provide more flexibility and creativity compared to Zoho meetings, which focuses primarily on real-time conferencing tools.
Viewer Insights: Loom offers an analytics tool that provides data on who viewed your videos and when. This can help gauge the effectiveness of video messages or tutorials shared amongst team members. Zoho meetings, on the other hand, focuses more on real-time participation metrics rather than post-meeting analysis.
Integration with Multiple Applications: The ability to integrate with different platforms like Slack, Youtube, and GitHub allows users to efficiently share their videos in different environments, providing a level of versatility not seen in Zoho meetings.
Loom primarily focuses on asynchronous communication, making it less suitable as a direct alternative to Zoho Meeting, which is more oriented towards real-time communication and collaborative sessions.
Loom lacks some of the robust features Zoho Meeting offers for webinars and large meetings. It does not support things like polling, registration process for webinars, and control over participant microphones which can be critical for large-scale meetings.
Loom does not offer the integrated suite of tools around scheduling and calendar integration like Zoho Meeting does. This lack of features may disrupt the streamlined business workflows that Zoho Meeting provides.
While Loom allows for video recording and sharing, it does not facilitate live meetings quite as efficiently as Zoho. The interaction in real-time meetings, with features like raising hand, swap presenters, which are quite handy in Zoho Meeting, are not available in Loom.
Loom’s main premise is video messaging and screen recording. When compared to Zoho Meeting which provides services like audio conferencing, dial-in numbers, moderator controls, Loom falls short in providing a comprehensive meeting solution.

Pick #11 is a voice messaging and video conferencing tool designed to streamline and facilitate effective digital communication within teams. As an alternative to Zoho Meeting, Yac offers unique features such as asynchronous voice messaging, which allows users to listen and respond to messages at their convenience, thereby reducing scheduling conflicts and time-zone discrepancies intrinsic to live conferences. Besides video conferencing, Yac also offers screen sharing, comments, and reactions on messages, ensuring smooth and comprehensive communication. Although Zoho Meeting provides a broader range of features such as webinar hosting and meeting scheduling, could serve as a preferable alternative for teams focusing on flexible and asynchronous communication.

Voice Messaging - Yac offers asynchronous voice messaging. This is useful in cases when meetings are not needed and a quick voice note would do the task. It saves time and is effective in communication, a feature that Zoho Meeting does not have.
Integration - Yac offers impressive integration with popular tools like Slack, GitHub, and Jira. This can make for smoother workflows when compared to Zoho Meeting, as it enables teams to share voice messages, screenshares, and transcriptions directly to the tools they are already using.
Transcription Service - Yac has a built-in automated transcription service. This allows users to quickly reference past calls without having to listen to the whole conversation, a feature not provided by Zoho Meeting.
Asynchronous Capability - With Yac, users can send voice and video messages that can be checked at the recipient's convenience, breaking away from the need for scheduling in advance like conventional online meetings, and increasing productivity.
Screen Sharing with Annotations - Yac offers screen sharing with annotations, a feature that helps in better expression of ideas. Although Zoho has screen sharing, the ability to annotate directly on the shared screen in real-time offered by Yac can be a game changer for many teams.
Yac relies heavily on voice messages for communication, which might not be ideal for all users, especially those who prefer typing their thoughts and instructions before sending them.
While Yac can offer a more informal and immediate way of communication, it lacks the extensive suite of features for organized meetings and webinars that Zoho Meeting provides, such as pre-set meeting schedules, setting agendas, etc.
Yac also does not have a polling feature, which Zoho Meeting has. This could prevent team leaders from getting immediate feedback or inputs during discussions.
Yac focuses more on asynchronous conversations and might not be the best solution for real-time or live collaborations and interactions, unlike Zoho Meetings which supports RTS (Real-Time Streaming).
Zoho Meetings provides users with detailed reports and insights for completed meetings including attendance, participation level, etc. Yac, on the other hand, does not have this feature, which means users miss out on important data for analyzing productivity and effectiveness of the meetings.


Opting for Zoho software is an excellent choice for businesses seeking an integrated suite of productivity tools tailored to streamline operations across various departments, such as sales, marketing, customer support, and accounting. Its flexibility and scalability make it a suitable option for businesses of all sizes, from startups to large enterprises, particularly those seeking to enhance collaboration amongst teams and improve efficiency through automation. Zoho’s extensive customization capabilities ensure that it can be tailored to meet the unique requirements of any business, providing a seamless workflow and a unified platform for managing diverse business functions.

On the other hand, choosing an alternative software product may be more appropriate for organizations with highly specialized needs that surpass the scope of Zoho’s offerings. Businesses that prioritize industry-specific functionalities, or those requiring a solution with a deeper focus on a particular aspect of business operations—be it advanced project management, deep analytics, or niche market requirements—might find more value in specialized software. Additionally, smaller businesses or startups operating on a tight budget might opt for alternatives that offer a more basic feature set at a lower cost or with a more flexible pricing model, allowing them to invest more strategically in their growth stages.

Top 10: Best Zoho Alternative