The 10 Best Whereby Alternatives

Explore a diverse selection of video conferencing platforms that offer distinctive features such as advanced customization, robust security protocols, simultaneous screen sharing and sophisticated user interfaces, to fulfill a variety of remote communication needs.

While provides a simplified video conferencing platform with easy-to-use features and no unnecessary downloads or installations, some users might seek alternatives due to certain limitations. The free version offers a limited number of participants, which can be a constrain for larger meetings. Audio and video quality can also vary depending on the speed and reliability of the user’s internet connection. Some users report issues with screen sharing quality and occasional glitches, while others desire more advanced features such as breakout rooms, polling, or event registration that Whereby does not offer. Cost could also drive users to explore alternatives, as pricing plans are per user, which can get expensive for larger teams.

Why would you look for Whereby Alternative alternative?

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital communication tools, seeking an alternative to Whereby becomes a consideration for those in search of more tailored features or different levels of user interface intuitiveness. Every organization has unique needs, from the depth of analytics to the customization of meeting rooms, and sometimes, a one-size-fits-all solution like Whereby does not precisely align with these specific requirements. The impetus to seek alternatives often stems from the desire to enhance productivity, improve user experience, or integrate more seamlessly with other tools already in use.

Moreover, scalability and security concerns may prompt users to explore options beyond Whereby. As teams grow and collaboration becomes more complex, the demand for robust security features and the ability to efficiently scale operations without hitches becomes paramount. For companies navigating sensitive industries, or for those who prioritize granular control over their digital communication tools, finding a platform that offers advanced security protocols and flexibility can be essential. Consequently, the search for an alternative is driven by the pursuit of a solution that better aligns with organizational priorities, be it through enhanced features, improved scalability, or more stringent security measures.

The Best Products

Whereby Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, an advanced cloud-based platform specialized for meeting notes, builds superior team coordination in the virtual meeting arena by innovating the manner in which meeting notes are taken, sorted, and distributed. Its streamlined note-taking in real-time, combined with cooperative editing and compatibility with favorite virtual meeting platforms and productivity tools, crowns it as an essential tool for teams across all scales.

A key highlight of ZipDo is its live note-taking which ensures that all attendees remain synchronized during virtual meetings, making traditional means of passing notes obsolete. Post-meeting, participants can effortlessly modify and supplement notes to maintain up-to-date records.

ZipDo’s high efficiency note organization system allows for effortless classification into channels or folders, harmonizing with virtual meeting platforms. Its feature of easily searchable notes amplifies efficiency, providing quick retrieval of precise information without the hassle of trailless hunting or lengthy scrolling.

With its detailed access control, ZipDo’s note-sharing feature guarantees safe information exchange with team members, clients, or partners during virtual meetings. Furthermore, its seamless integration with virtual meeting platforms and calendars creates automated cooperative note formation for each meeting, significantly reducing manual labor.

In conclusion, as a highly user-friendly platform, ZipDo offers a full spectrum of features to boost team productivity, collaboration, and project management in a virtual meeting setting. Its live note-taking, cooperative editing, organization, searchable content, information sharing, and integration abilities makes it a cherished tool, enhancing the management of virtual meetings and driving efficient project advancement.

Pick #2


Zoom is a leading video conferencing platform that serves as a strong alternative to Whereby. It offers a wide host of features not only for video conferencing but also for webinars, meetings, chats, and phone services. The platform is recognized for its superior video and audio quality, flexibility, scalability, and ability to support large groups concurrently, making it beneficial for both small-scale personal use and large-scale professional use. Unlike Whereby which relies on being purely web-based, Zoom offers dedicated apps for all major operating systems, allowing a more robust interaction, higher participant capacity, and advanced features like breakout rooms, co-annotation, and recording, thus enhancing participant engagement and overall collaboration.

Larger Meeting Capacity - Zoom supports up to 1000 video participants and 49 videos on screen, which may be more than what Whereby offers. This makes it a suitable alternative for larger businesses or educational institutions that need to host big online meetings or webinars.
More Robust Features - Zoom provides a wider array of features compared to Whereby. For instance, it includes features like breakout rooms, which allow the host to split the Zoom meeting into separate sessions and in-meeting chat for private and group discussions.
Extensive Integration Capability - Zoom can be smoothly integrated with various software and productivity tools such as Microsoft Outlook, Gmail, Slack, and Salesforce, which can enhance user productivity and improve workflows.
Record and Transcription Capabilities - Zoom provides the ability to record meetings and transcribe them. This can be a useful feature for people who want a record of what was discussed during the meeting, which may not be offered by Whereby.
Enhanced Control for Hosts - In Zoom, hosts have the ability to control mic and camera access, which provides for a more structured and orderly meeting environment. This can be beneficial for large meetings where maintaining order can be a challenge.
Limited Number of Participants - As opposed to Whereby that allows everybody who has a link to join a conversation without any hard cap, Zoom has limitations on the number of participants depending on the plan that you select.
Meeting Duration – Despite offering unlimited 1-to-1 meetings, Zoom restricts the length of meetings in its free plan to 40 minutes, whereas Whereby does not impose such a limit.
Interface Complexity – Whereas Whereby has a very user-friendly, straightforward, and intuitive interface, Zoom can be a bit more complex for some users, having many features that can overwhelm inexperienced users.
High Resource Consumption - Compared to Whereby, Zoom tends to consume more system resources, meaning it may not function as smoothly on older systems, which could lead to latency issues.
Need for Installation - Unlike Whereby, which is completely browser-based, Zoom requires software installation. This can be a disadvantage for those who do not wish to download another application or fear compatibility issues with their devices.

Pick #3

GoTo Meeting

GoToMeeting is an online meetings, video conferencing, and web conferencing software, which offers high-definition video and screen sharing capabilities, aiming to provide efficient communication among teams and businesses. As an alternative to Whereby, GoToMeeting offers additional features such as integration with calendar apps, drawing tools, and mobile compatibility, making it a comprehensive choice for larger organizations that require advanced features. Unlike Whereby which has a more relaxed approach focusing on ease of use and simplicity, GoToMeeting is designed with corporate users in mind, focusing on robust functionality, reliability, and the ability to handle larger meetings, making it more suited for larger businesses with complex needs.

Robust Functionality: GoToMeeting offers a fully-featured solution. Beyond simple video conferencing, it includes capabilities for HD video, screen sharing, and even drawing tools, providing a comprehensive platform for all sorts of virtual collaboration.
Scalable Solution: GoToMeeting offers greater scalability. It can accommodate larger meetings and webinars for up to 3000 participants as opposed to the smaller meeting size limitations of Whereby.
Integrated Audio: GoToMeeting provides built-in audio conferencing. This enables participants to join via phone or computer. This is especially useful when participants have poor internet connections or when they're on the go.
Mobile Optimization: GoToMeeting offers a feature-filled mobile application available for both iOS and Android. This provides a seamless user experience across different devices which is crucial for organizations with team members who are frequently on the move.
Multinational Toll-Free Support: GoToMeeting provides support for toll-free calling in more than 50 countries. This becomes quite useful for multinational corporations or for those organizations that have clients or team members globally distributed.
GoToMeeting requires users to download and install its software on their devices to be able to join meetings, a step which is not necessary with Whereby. This download time and process can act as a barrier for some users, particularly those who are less technically proficient.
GoToMeeting has a more complex user interface in comparison to Whereby. This could be frustrating for users who want simplicity and ease of use.
In GoToMeeting, initiating on-the-fly meetings can be more challenging compared to Whereby, which is designed for simplicity and allows users to create a meeting with a simple URL share.
GoToMeeting does not offer the same level of customization as Whereby, which allows users to add their own branding to the meeting rooms. This may make GoToMeeting less appealing for businesses wanting to maintain a consistent brand image.
While both platforms offer support for multiple participants, provides a more clear and comprehensive overview of all participants through its ‘grid view’. This feature is preferred by many users, as it can be advantageous during group discussions or presentations. The lack of this in GoToMeeting may pose a disadvantage.

Pick #4


WebEx is a leading, multi-functional, and widely used online collaboration tool owned by Cisco Systems. It offers a rich suite of video conferencing features, including high-quality video and audio, screen sharing, virtual whiteboards, and interactive meeting tools, which make it a compelling alternative to Whereby. While Whereby excels in simplicity and user-friendly interfaces, WebEx provides advanced features like file sharing, recording, and annotation capabilities, making it suitable for both small team meetings and larger webinars or corporate video conferencing. It also offers robust security and compatibility across multiple devices and operating systems.

Large Scale Accessibility - WebEx can accommodate up to 200 participants in a single meeting in its basic plan. This makes it a great alternative to Whereby, which limits the number of participants to 50 in its professional package.
Advanced Feature Set - WebEx provides a range of advanced features not seen in Whereby, including breakout sessions, virtual hand-raising, Q&A management, polling, and automatic transcription. These capabilities allow for greater engagement, making it suitable for larger, more interactive meetings and webinars.
Integration Capability - WebEx offers broader third-party integration options, such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Google Calendar. This can be advantageous for businesses that have a wide array of other software tools and want to streamline their workflow by integrating their meeting platform with these tools.
Enterprise Scale Support - WebEx by Cisco provides robust, enterprise-level support, making it a suitable option for larger enterprises and organizations. This means that it has excellent support structures in place to help troubleshoot and resolve issues efficiently.
Training and Education Features - WebEx has offerings tailored towards training and online learning like WebEx training center, which includes features like testing and automated grading. This makes it a suitable choice for organizations or institutions that conduct regular training or educational sessions.
Limited Ease of Use - WebEx requires software installation on each device before it can be used, whereas Whereby is web-based and no setup or download is needed to start or join a meeting. This can make WebEx less convenient to use, especially for spontaneous gatherings or for participants who are less tech-savvy.
Less Accessible Interface - WebEx has an interface that is more intricate as compared to Whereby's user-friendly, straightforward design. This can make it more difficult for users who are not tech-savvy to navigate and find specific features.
Meeting duration limitations - In comparison to Whereby, the free version of WebEx has a limit on the length of meetings. This can be restricting if your meetings or sessions normally tend to run longer.
No In-Built Chat Feature - While both platforms support integration with external collaboration tools, Whereby comes with an in-built chat feature that allows participants to carry on text conversations alongside the video call directly in the platform. This feature is absent in WebEx.
Lack of personalization - Whereby allows you to customize your own room URL, which is not available in WebEx. This can make it challenging for those who desire a more personal touch and ease of remembering URLs for frequent meetings.

Pick #5

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams is a robust communication and collaboration platform that is part of the Microsoft 365 suite, offering an alternative to video conferencing software like It provides various functionalities beyond video conferencing such as chat, file sharing, task management, and integration with numerous other Microsoft and third-party services, aiming to fulfill all communication and collaboration needs within an organization. In addition to audio and video meetings, Microsoft Teams supports screen sharing, real-time collaboration on documents, and customized backgrounds in video calls, suited for both small teams and larger enterprise-level conferencing. Functioning as more than a meet-up platform, it serves as a comprehensive workspace that enhances team productivity and communication continuity.

Superior Integration: Microsoft Teams offers robust integration with the entire Office 365 suite and other Microsoft services. This includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Planner, and many more, allowing for seamless collaboration and workflow.
Enhanced File Collaboration: Microsoft Teams excels in real-time document collaboration. With Teams, several members can work on the same document simultaneously, and changes are synced instantaneously. This feature is hugely beneficial for businesses that work collaboratively on documents, spreadsheets, or presentations.
Advanced Meeting Features: Microsoft Teams includes features designed for larger corporate environments, like meeting recording, transcription services, and the ability to host very large meetings. This is especially useful for businesses that need comprehensive meeting tools.
Powerful Search Functionality: Microsoft Teams offers a powerful search feature, allowing users to quickly find and navigate to specific conversations, files, or content within a chat. This can enhance productivity by reducing the time spent looking for specific pieces of information.
Extensive App Integrations: Microsoft Teams supports integration with a wide range of third-party apps, making it more customizable to fit a business's unique needs. Users can integrate apps such as Trello, GitHub, Adobe Creative Cloud, and others, amplifying its functionality beyond just video conferencing.
Larger Learning Curve: Microsoft Teams has a steeper learning curve compared to Whereby. It is bundled with many features and tools that can be overwhelming for new users who are not familiar with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Meeting Setup Complexity: Setting up a meeting in Microsoft Teams might seem more complex when compared to Whereby. In Whereby, users can start a chat room quickly and simply by providing a URL. In Microsoft Teams, there are many steps to follow to create meeting rooms.
Device Compatibility: While Microsoft Teams supports various platforms, there have been instances of compatibility issues with certain devices. For instance, Teams may not offer the full range of functionality that it provides on Windows devices on devices with operating systems like macOS, Linux, or Chrome OS.
Integration Limitation: Microsoft Teams strongly integrates with other Microsoft products, but if you're using software from other vendors, integration may not be as smooth. On the other hand, Whereby offers easy integration with various Apps, even if they are not part of the same software family.
Web Version Limitations: Microsoft Teams' web version has some limitations, especially when it comes to meeting controls and permissions whereas Whereby is fully functional via a web browser without the need of installing a dedicated app.

Pick #6


Vowel is a video conferencing software that serves as an alternative to tools like Whereby. The unique selling point of Vowel is its focus on not just facilitating meetings but making them more meaningful and productive. It provides features for easy scheduling, integrated agendas, live transcription, and post-meeting summaries. It enhances the meeting experience through innovative tools like searchable transcriptions, visual timelines, and the ability to tag action items and highlights in real-time. This enables teams to turn meetings into fully searchable content, making them more engaging, effective, and insightful for continuous learning and improvement.

Advanced Meeting Transcription: Vowel offers advanced transcription capabilities. It can transcribe meetings in real-time, which is particularly useful when you need to review a meeting's content or keep track of key points but can't attend in person or miss something during the actual meeting.
Meeting Summaries: Beyond transcription, Vowel also provides its users with meeting summaries. This makes it easy for users to skim through the most important points and issues brought up during the meeting, without having to watch or listen to the entire session.
Enhanced Collaboration Tools: Vowel incorporates collaboration tools such as shared notes, tasks, and decision logs. These features make it easier for team members to collaborate both during and after the meeting.
Meeting Analytics: Vowel also provides meeting analytics, helping managers and participants understand how time was spent in the meeting, who spoke the most, and what topics were discussed. This can help teams make their meetings more effective and productive over time.
Integration with Calendars: Vowel can integrate with users' calendars, making it easier to organize meetings, send out invites, and avoid scheduling conflicts. It can even automatically reserve buffer time after meetings, to accommodate overruns or provide a break between back-to-back meetings.
Vowel is known for its recording and transcription features, but in real-time communication and simple video conferencing, Whereby may offer a smoother experience as it is specifically designed for this purpose.
Vowel's tight integration with Google Calendar might make scheduling meetings with those outside of your Google ecosystem - clients, partners, freelance collaborators - more challenging compared to Whereby.
Vowel may not be as user-friendly for non-technical users compared to Whereby. As an advanced platform with recording and transcription features, some of Vowel's functionalities might not be as intuitive to users who are seeking a simple video conferencing tool.
Vowel is primarily geared towards structured meetings with a clear agenda and intended for productivity, while Whereby's flexibility allows it to be used for more casual, informal meetings or virtual hangouts. This might limit Vowel's usability based on the type of meeting or event you are trying to host.
Vowel is a newer entrant in the video conferencing space, which may mean less third-party integrations and developer support compared to more established platforms like Whereby. This could potentially restrict the versatility and adaptability of the tool when it comes to integrating it with other software solutions you may use in your organization.

Pick #7


Claap is an innovative scheduling and virtual meeting platform designed to be an alternative to traditional video conferencing software like This platform simplifies the process of scheduling meetings by allowing users to share their availability directly through an email or the platform itself. Moreover, Claap offers asynchronous video meetings that facilitate efficient business communication without needing everyone to be available at the same time. This means discussions can continue over a period of time rather than in a single, often time-consuming meeting. Communication is recorded, can be revisited, and there’s no need to write minutes. Thus, Claap offers an intuitive, time-saving solution to the constraints of live video conferencing.

Seamless User Experience: Claap has a highly intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, even for beginners. This makes it more accessible to non-tech savvy users who might struggle with other platforms.
No Downloads Required: Unlike many video conferencing services, Claap runs entirely on the web. This means users don't need to download any software or apps. They can access the platform from their browser on their computer or phone.
Integration with Calendar Apps: Claap offers integration with Google and Outlook calendars. This makes planning and scheduling meetings a breeze. Users can easily view their scheduled meetings and add new ones without leaving the platform.
No Time Limit: Unlike Whereby, which has a time limit on its free version, Claap does not impose a time limit on meetings. This can be an essential feature for those who conduct long meetings or workshops.
Audio-only Mode: Claap offers an audio-only mode, which can be beneficial for users with limited bandwidth. This also helps reduce distractions during the meeting, allowing participants to focus on the content.
Claap is heavily video-centric, making it less convenient for users who prefer or need to communicate via audio-only or text-based chats - something Whereby provides.
With Claap, there's no function to host multiple breakout rooms within one meeting, a feature Whereby possesses. This makes it less suited for complex collaborative projects involving multiple small teams.
Claap lacks a built-in file sharing function, unlike Whereby. This makes sharing documents during a meeting more complex, as users have to rely on third-party services.
Claap does not offer as many integrations as Whereby, which could limit the overall efficiency in a digital workspace. Whereby integrates with tools like Google Calendar and Outlook for easy scheduling.
Claap has a strict 'one meeting at a time' policy, whereas Whereby allows a user to join multiple meetings concurrently. This means Claap users might struggle with multitasking and time management when handling different meetings.

Pick #8


Loom is a versatile video communication platform designed to facilitate work communication through the creation of shareable, instantly ready video messages or real-time video conferencing. Unlike Whereby, Loom goes beyond traditional video conferencing by enabling users to record their screen, voice, and face to create explainers or presentations for professional use. These recordings can be effortlessly shared through a link, facilitating easy collaboration and feedback among teams. Its user-friendly interface, video editing features, viewer insights, and the option to save videos for future reference make it a comprehensive alternative to standard video conferencing platforms.

Enhanced Recording Features - Loom allows users to record videos of their screen, voice, and face simultaneously, enabling clearer and more personalized communication. This can be particularly beneficial for performance feedback, onboarding, project presentations, or simple messages, which can be more effectively conveyed with the added context of facial expressions and voice tone.
Edit Options - Loom provides an option to trim recordings at the beginning and end which is particularly beneficial for removing unnecessary parts of the video before sharing. Additionally, users can use the call to action feature in Loom to direct viewers to a specific URL at the end of the video.
Comprehensible and Interactive Comments - Loom offers a feature wherein viewers can comment on a specific timestamp in the video. This allows for very precise feedback and clarification on particular points discussed or shown in the video, potentially improving discussion and problem-solving efficiency.
Seamless Integration - Loom can be integrated with a host of other tools and platforms such as Slack, Gmail, Notion, and Trello, to name a few. This functionality can streamline workflows and enhance efficiency by reducing the need for switching between applications.
Easy Video Sharing - Loom provides a link for each video that users can send via email or instant messaging apps, ensuring quick and convenient sharing. The recipients of this link do not have to download any application or sign up to view the video.
Lack of Live Interaction - Unlike Whereby, Loom doesn't provide real-time, interactive communication. It's a one-way, asynchronous video messaging tool, which may not fulfill the needs of users who wish to engage in direct, live conversations.
Limited Features - Compared to Whereby, Loom has fewer collaboration features. It doesn't have features such as breakout rooms or built-in interactive whiteboards, which can limit its utility for large teams or educational settings.
Inefficient for Quick Questions - For quick questions or short discussions, using Loom can be less efficient than Whereby. In Loom, the user has to record a message, upload it, and then wait for the receiver to see it and respond.
No Scheduling Feature - Loom does not offer any built-in scheduling features. In contrast, Whereby integrates with calendar apps and allows users to schedule meetings, ensuring participants are aware and available at the determined meeting time.
Delayed Feedback - Feedback and responses in Loom are delayed since it's not a synchronous communication tool. In contrast, Whereby allows for instant feedback during calls and meetings, which can be crucial for resolving issues or making decisions promptly.

Pick #9

Google Meet

Google Meet is a premium video conferencing software that offers a more comprehensive and integrated alternative to Part of the Google Workspace family of tools, Google Meet allows for high-quality video meetings and webinars for up to 250 participants, with useful features such as screen sharing, real-time captions, and compatibility with multiple devices. It’s heavily integrated with Google’s ecosystem, including applications like Gmail, Calendar and Drive, providing a seamless and collaborative workspace. Moreover, it comes with advanced security protocols, providing users a secure environment to conduct their video conferencing. Compared to Whereby, Google Meet may offer greater capacities and functional integrations, particularly suited to larger organizations or those heavily using Google services.

Google Integration: Google Meet is deeply integrated with the Google ecosystem. This means it's exceptionally simple for users to connect their Google Calendar or Gmail for seamless scheduling, invitations, and meeting initiations.
Higher Participant Limit: Google Meet allows for a larger number of participants in a single meeting. With Google Workspace Enterprise edition, Google Meet supports up to 250 participants in a meeting which is a significant advantage for larger teams or organizations.
Live Captioning: Google Meet offers real-time closed captioning powered by Google's speech-to-text technology, making it more accessible to people who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Record Meetings: Unlike Whereby, Google Meet offers the option to record meetings and save them to Google Drive. This means meetings can be archived and easily referred to in the future or used for training purposes.
Advanced Presentation Features: Google Meet offers robust presentation features like screen sharing, option to present a Chrome tab specifically (great for playing videos), and whiteboarding with the use of Jamboard,+ which can be very advantageous for team collaboration, detailed presentations, and brainstorming during meetings.
Limitations for Non-G Suite Users - As a alternative, Google Meet might not be the best choice for users who do not have G Suite accounts. Certain features like recording meetings, scheduling capabilities, and advanced admin controls require a G Suite account, which might not work well with individual or non-business users.
Lack of True Browser Support - Google Meet operates best in Google Chrome as compared to other browsers. Although it supports other browsers, where performance issues sometimes occur. floats on being browser agnostic, offering full functionality across all major browsers.
User Interface - While Google Meet offers a clean and simple interface, it could be viewed as less user-friendly in comparison to Things like presenting your screen require multiple steps as opposed to a one-click solution on
Dependency on Google Account - To use Google Meet, at least one person in a meeting needs to have a Google Account. This could be a disadvantage for users who don't wish to create or use a Google account, while does not require a user to have any specific account, just a meeting link.
Anonymity Factor - Google Meet lacks the feature of anonymous joining in a meeting without having to sign in, unlike which allows guests to join a meeting without creating an account or providing personal details. In case of sensitive meetings or user’s preference for anonymity, stands as a better choice.

Pick #10

Zoho Meeting

Zoho Meeting is a powerful video conferencing software that can serve as a viable alternative to It offers robust features not limited to video conferencing, webinars, screen sharing, and recording options for meetings. The platform is recognized for its seamless integration with other Zoho products (like Zoho CRM), thereby creating a comprehensive business suite. It also supports multiple languages and offers real-time chat, making it more versatile for international business collaboration. Its primary strengths lie in easy setup without any downloads, ensuring efficient cross-platform usage, and its pricing structure, which can be more cost-effective for small to mid-sized businesses.

Integrated Suite of Applications: Unlike, Zoho Meeting is part of the Zoho Suite that includes a variety of business software. This can significantly simplify data migration, user management, and task coordination among various apps.
Better Control of Attendees: Zoho Meeting provides multilevel access controls and participant roles (such as moderator, presenter, or attendee). This allows the host to manage the conference with more ease and precision, which are features not readily available in
Advanced Recording Features: Zoho Meeting offers functionality to record meetings and webinars automatically or manually and store them in the cloud. This can be advantageous for teams that need to review meetings, a feature not as advanced in
Multipurpose Sessions: Zoho Meeting allows setting up meetings and webinars. This allows more flexibility depending on business needs, for online training, marketing presentation or team collaboration session.
Effective Integration: Zoho Meeting syncs with Google Calendar, enabling you to schedule and join meetings directly from your calendar events, a feature not available in this form in Also, Zoho Meeting integrates seamlessly with other Zoho applications like Zoho CRM and Project management apps for effective collaboration and data accessibility.
Limited integrations. Zoho Meeting lacks broad integration capabilities when compared with Whereby. Whereby offers seamless integrations with tools like Slack, Google Calendar, & Outlook. Zoho Meeting, although has integrations with Zoho suite of products, it falls short in terms of other broader software integrations.
Inferior user interface. Zoho Meeting is not as user-friendly and modern as Whereby. The latter is preferred for its intuitive and smooth interface which supports dragging-and-dropping of files, easy screen sharing, and cleaner appearance.
Less customization. Zoho Meeting does not offer as much room for customization compared to Whereby. Whereby offers personalized URLs and room metaphors for users, but Zoho Meeting lacks the feature of creating personalized meeting rooms.
Limited Free Version. Zoho Meeting does not support more than 2 participants in its free version, while Whereby has room for up to 4 participants in its free version.
Limited video quality and speed. Users have reported that Zoho Meeting sometimes lacks in terms of video quality or speed, especially when multiple users join in, compared to Whereby, known for minimal latency and crisp video quality.

Pick #11

BlueJeans Meetings

BlueJeans is a cloud-based video conferencing software alternative to It offers interactive, multi-directional video communication services to businesses and individuals, providing a premium video conferencing experience with enterprise-grade security and seamless integrations with productivity tools. BlueJeans supports a vast range of devices and operating systems and offers features like meeting recording, screen sharing, chat, and multi-party video calls. While Whereby excels in simplicity and ease of use, BlueJeans gives more advanced, enterprise-focused features and functionalities catering to different business sizes and needs.

Superior Scalability & Flexibility: BlueJeans provides greater capability for scaling up meetings, as it can host up to 100 participants in basic meetings, and up to 15,000 in live events, making it an ideal platform for medium to large scale conferencing needs.
In-app Intelligence: BlueJeans offers a variety of in-built Artificial Intelligence (AI) features, such as transcription services, highlight reels, and meeting insights, which drastically improve the user experience and productivity.
Broad Interoperability: As a Whereby alternative, BlueJeans holds an advantage in its compatibility with a wide range of platforms and business applications, such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Facebook Workplace, offering seamless integration and ensuring uninterrupted workflow.
Advanced Collaboration Tools: BlueJeans offers a suite of advanced features like screen sharing, annotation, and whiteboarding, which go beyond traditional video conferencing and facilitate effective collaboration.
Improved Video and Audio Quality: BlueJeans uses Dolby Voice technology, providing superior sound and video performance compared to many other platforms, including Whereby. The audio/visual clarity enhances communication, especially in larger meetings or presentations.
BlueJeans requires installation of software or an app on your device to run, which might not be convenient for all users especially those who prefer browser-based solutions like Whereby.
On the free version of BlueJeans, there is a limit of 50 minutes per meeting which might not provide adequate time for lengthy meetings or presentations, whereas Whereby offers sessions of unlimited duration.
BlueJeans doesn’t offer the option for custom branding or personalization that Whereby provides. This could be a downside for companies who wish to maintain a consistent branding across all their platforms.
BlueJeans heavily emphasizes enterprise-level solutions, which might be overwhelming and superfluous for smaller teams or individual users, while Whereby has a more lightweight, streamlined interface that might be more intuitive for such users.
BlueJeans does not offer a feature similar to the ‘lock room’ feature in Whereby. This feature in Whereby allows the host to control the variables of the meeting space, which might be desirable for some users.


Using Whereby makes eminent sense when you’re seeking simplicity and user-friendliness in your video conferencing needs. It excels for small teams or businesses that prioritize quick setup and ease of use over complex features. Whereby’s no-download, browser-based platform means participants can join meetings effortlessly, making it an ideal choice for hosting quick meetings or virtual gatherings without burdening participants with software installations. Its straightforward interface and essential features support effective communication and collaboration for users who value convenience and efficiency in their virtual interactions.

On the other hand, opting for an alternative software product might be more appropriate for organizations with advanced needs, such as large-scale webinars, intricate team collaborations, or comprehensive administrative controls. If your requirements include deep integration with other productivity tools, sophisticated security measures, or extensive customization options, exploring other solutions would be prudent. These products often offer broader functionalities and scalability to support complex workflows and larger groups, catering to businesses looking to invest in comprehensive virtual communication and collaboration ecosystems.

Top 10: Best Whereby Alternative