Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Slido Alternatives

There are ten alternative tools to Slido that offer various interactive features such as live polling, Q&A sessions, quizzes, surveys, and real-time audience engagement options for efficient meetings and events.

Learn more about our top picks for: Slido Alternative

Someone may look for an alternative to Slido, a meeting engagement software, for several reasons. They might find Slido’s user interface not intuitive or complicated to use. They might also be seeking more advanced features or functionalities that Slido does not offer. Moreover, the costs associated with Slido might be higher than other options in market, prompting a search for a more cost-effective solution. Additionally, Slido might not integrate well with their existing systems or applications, making it less efficient for their specific needs. Lastly, they might raise concerns about the customer support or have faced issues with the reliability or performance of the Slido platform. Each individual or company has unique requirements, so these factors will thus influence their decision to seek an alternative to Slido.

Why would you look for Slido Alternative alternative?

Searching for an alternative to Slido might stem from the desire to find a solution that offers greater flexibility and customization. Users often seek platforms that can seamlessly adapt to a wide array of event types and sizes, from small team meetings to vast conferences, without sacrificing the quality of interaction. An alternative might provide more robust features that cater to unique user needs, such as advanced moderation controls, deeper analytics for post-event insights, or superior audience engagement tools, all of which could significantly enhance the overall experience for both organizers and participants.

Additionally, cost-effectiveness is a crucial factor that drives individuals and organizations to explore alternatives to Slido. While Slido offers a range of valuable features, users with budget constraints or those who require more specific functionalities might find themselves looking for options that offer a better price-performance ratio. An ideal alternative would deliver not only competitive pricing but also scalability, allowing users to tailor the service to their precise requirements without incurring unnecessary costs. This approach ensures that the investment in an interactive platform is optimized, providing maximum return and efficacy for the user’s specific context.

The Best Products

Slido Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, an innovative cloud-based collaboration software for meeting notes, has been transforming the dynamics of team collaboration by reinventing the methods of capturing, organizing, and sharing meeting notes. With its real-time note-taking capabilities, collaborative editing features, and compatibility with well-known calendars and productivity tools, it serves as an invaluable asset for teams, regardless of their size.

One of the key hallmarks of ZipDo is its real-time note-taking capability, which ensures everyone remains aligned during meetings, effectively negating the requirement of traditional note passing. Following the meeting, team members are offered the convenience to modify and contribute to the notes for presenting the most recent updates.

When it comes to note organization, ZipDo is superlative, facilitating smooth categorization into diverse channels or folders. The efficiency is significantly amplified with its searchable notes, paving the way for quick retrieval of specific details, nullifying the need for time-consuming scrolling or manual searches.

ZipDo’s note-sharing function guarantees secure dissemination of information with team members, clients, or associates through its granular access control. The seamless integrations with various calendars further automate the process of collaborative note generation for each meeting, circumventing the necessity of manual entries.

In a nutshell, ZipDo stands out as an easy-to-use platform that provides a comprehensive suite of features aimed at enhancing team productivity, promoting collaboration, and simplifying project management. Through its real-time note-taking, collaborative editing, superior organization, easy retrieval, secure sharing, and practical integrations, ZipDo streamlines the process of managing meetings, thereby guaranteeing efficient progression of projects.

Pick #2


Parabol is a customizable, open-source project management tool designed to streamline online collaborations and meetings for remote teams. It stands as an alternative to Slido’s meeting engagement software by offering unique features like retrospective meetings, multi-board view, and creating checklists along with task assignments. Its particular strength lies in facilitating agile ceremonies such as sprint planning, daily standups, and retrospectives. Further, being open-source allows for customization and adaptation based on individual company needs. Compared to Slido, which focuses more on interactive presentations and Q&A sessions, Parabol is more centered around task management and team agile workflow.

Agile Software Focus: Unlike Slido, which is primarily a Q&A and polling tool, Parabol is specifically designed for agile team collaboration. It offers dedicated features for tasks like sprint planning, retrospectives, and stand-ups making it the preferred choice for teams using agile methodologies.
In-depth Retrospectives: Parabol has tools for conducting retrospectives that allow the team to reflect on what was accomplished during the sprint and what improvements can be made. This is a feature that Slido does not offer, making Parabol more suitable for developmental cycle reviews.
Task Tracking: Parabol offers a user-friendly tool for tracking tasks and progress. It allows you to visualize, assign, and prioritize tasks seamlessly, which goes beyond Slido's primarily Q&A and polling functions.
Meeting Summaries: At the end of each meeting, Parabol auto-generates a meeting summary that includes what was discussed, actions that need to be taken, and items discussed. This feature is not provided by Slido and can be helpful in coordinating with team members and stakeholders in a project after the meeting.
Integrations: Parabol supports direct integrations with numerous popular productivity tools such as Github, Jira, and Slack. This allows for easier management of tasks and workflows, and smoother team collaboration, unlike Slido where the integration options might not be as extensive.
Limited Interactivity - Parabol is primarily aimed toward agile project management with a focus on retrospective meetings and doesn't offer the same level of audience engagement and interactivity as Slido, which has functionalities such as live polls, Q&A, quizzes, and word clouds.
Feature Limitations - Parabol lacks features like event analytics, custom branding, and social media integrations, which Slido provides. This could mean a less comprehensive experience for users who require these features for their events or meetings.
Learning Curve - Unlike Slido, which has a more straightforward, user-friendly interface, users may find Parabol's interface more convoluted. This presents a potential learning curve for new users who are used to simpler, more intuitive platforms.
Lack of Mobile Optimization - While Slido has dedicated mobile applications that enhance user experience, Parabol doesn’t offer such apps. This could limit accessibility of Parabol for users who want to interact or participate on their mobile devices.
Limited Customization - Slido offer different levels of customization, allowing users to tailor and brand their polls or questions to fit their unique needs, while Parabol offers less customization, making it less flexible for users with specific requirements.

Pick #3


GoRetro is an agile retrospective tool that serves as an alternative to the meeting engagement software Slido. While Slido focuses on building interactions through Q&A, live polls and quizzes during live meetings or conferences, GoRetro stands out with its focus on software development teams’ collaboration and continuous improvement. It helps manage and streamline agile retrospectives, and boosts team’s productivity and communication, supporting teams in reflecting on their work and identifying areas for improvement. With functionalities like comprehensive boards for different retrospective techniques, feedback anonymization, actions items tracking and more, GoRetro is particularly suitable for distributed teams and scrum masters who aim to smoothly facilitate retrospectives.

Enhanced Collaboration: GoRetro allows for greater collaboration between team members during retrospectives, which is a significant advantage over Slido.
Flexibility on Retro Formats: GoRetro provides different formats for conducting retrospectives - Starfish, SWOT, Start Stop Continue etc., giving teams the ability to switch formats according to their needs.
Time-Efficient Review: The platform is designed for making agile retrospective fast and efficient. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams that conduct frequent retros and require fast review times.
Inline Commenting: The inline commenting and discussion feature of GoRetro enables teams to have focused, relevant discussions in real-time about specific agenda items, increasing the efficiency of retrospectives.
Enables Asynchronous Communication: GoRetro allows asynchronous participation, enabling team members across different time zones to be a part of the retrospective, which is not possible with Slido's live poll and Q&A feature.
GoRetro is primarily a retrospective tool aimed at agile teams, whereas Slido is designed for more general audience interaction, which could make it less versatile in diverse event environments.
Unlike Slido, GoRetro might not support live Q&A and polls effectively. This can limit real-time audience engagement during corporate presentations or conferences.
Slido has straightforward presentation setup with easy integration into presentation tools like PowerPoint, Google Slides, etc. GoRetro lacks such direct integration which may cause inconvenience.
Slido has an anonymous option for polling and questions, making it more suitable for sensitive discussions. GoRetro, being a team collaboration tool, does not support anonymity as inherently.
Slido has excellent features for events such as quiz, word cloud, rating, etc., that help make a conference interactive and engaging. GoRetro is still focused on retrospective sessions so these features aren't available, limiting its ability to provide additional audience interaction.

Pick #4


Mentimeter is an interactive presentation software that is regarded as an appealing alternative to Meeting Engagement Software like Slido. It offers a variety of functionalities to make meetings and presentations more engaging, interactive, and dynamic. Utilizing real-time voting, fun quizzes, Q&A sessions, and interactive polls, Mentimeter fosters active audience participation and a more insightful exchange of ideas. The software’s easy-to-use interface and flexibility further add to its popularity among educators, team leaders, and speakers looking for an efficient tool to maximize involvement and feedback during their presentations or meetings.

Higher Interaction Types - Compared to Slido, Mentimeter offers more types of interactive presentations like quizzes, polls, word clouds, and Q&A sessions that improve audience engagement.
Real-time Visualizations - Mentimeter provides live data visualizations that are more dynamic and interactive, enabling presenters to better understand audience response in real-time.
Unlimited Presentations - Unlike Slido, Mentimeter does not limit the number of interactive presentations you can create, allowing you to engage with your audience as often as you want.
Improved Session Control - With Mentimeter, the presenter has the ability to control the pace of the presentation, whereas Slido relies on audience initiative, making Mentimeter potentially better for less tech-savvy participants.
Comprehensive Reporting - Mentimeter offers more comprehensive feedback collection and reporting capabilities than Slido, enabling you to capture and analyze attendee engagement data and feedback effectively.
Limited Customization - Compared to Slido, Mentimeter lacks in terms of customization. Slido offers more personalization options in the form of themes, colors, and layout changes, while Mentimeter has basic design tweaks.
Complexity in Setup - Slido has a more straightforward setup and requires fewer steps compared to Mentimeter. This results in Mentimeter being slightly more time consuming, especially for novice users.
Lacks in-depth Analytics - Slido offers more in-depth analysis and reports, providing insights on participant interaction. On the other hand, Mentimeter does not have such extensive analysis.
Interface - Mentimeter's audience interface is a bit complicated and crowded with text, while Slido has a cleaner and more approachable design, enhancing user participation.
Limited Question Types - In comparison with Slido, Mentimeter offers fewer types of poll questions, limiting the ways in which you can engage with your audience.

Pick #5

Team Retro

TeamRetro is a specialized software solution that facilitates agile retrospectives in an online environment for distributed teams, thereby serving as an alternative to Slido’s meeting engagement software. Unlike Slido which focuses more on audience interaction through live polls, Q&A sessions and quizzes, TeamRetro is designed to streamline sprint retrospective meetings, enhancing collaboration and continuous improvement within software development teams. It offers advanced features such as real-time voting, team sentiment tracking, and action item tracking among others, aiming to improve team dialogues, identify and solve problems, and drive future project success.

Enhanced Meeting Facilitation: TeamRetro offers features like guided retrospectives and temperature checks which can make meetings more effective and well-directed compared to Slido.
Comprehensive Analysis: TeamRetro allows users to delve deeper into team performance and dynamics, offering heatmap analytics for more comprehensive insights, while Slido is more focused on gathering and showcasing questions and polls.
More structured Feedback Process: TeamRetro allows categorization and grouping of similar feedback points and then voting to prioritize them. This structured process may be more beneficial for well-rounded feedback than the more freestyle Q&A approach of Slido.
Agile and Scrum Methodology Integration: TeamRetro suits teams that work under Agile or Scrum methodologies, offering features like sprint retrospectives that Slido doesn't provide.
Action Tracking: TeamRetro provides outstanding action tracking capabilities, enabling teams to monitor progress and assign accountability measures more effectively than what is possible with Slido.
TeamRetro specializes in agile retrospective functionality, whereas Slido is optimized for real-time engagement during meetings or events. This means TeamRetro lacks live polling, audience Q&A, and interactive features that Slido excels in.
Slido is more conductive to large-scale presentations or conferences due to its dedicated interactive router feature, which ensures connection stability during high-traffic times. TeamRetro isn't designed for this usage scenario and might face scalability issues.
TeamRetro serves its purpose well for generating high-quality retrospectives among software teams, but it falls short when it comes to the engaging content creation capabilities of Slido such as creating quizzes, crowdsourcing ideas, or receiving live feedback.
In contrast to Slido, which allows anonymous voting, question submissions, and feedback sharing, anonymity isn't the main focus in TeamRetro. This difference matters particularly in environments where audience openness and confidentiality are vital.
While Slido has robust integrations with presentation tools (like PowerPoint, Prezi, Presenter View) that makes it possible to run polls, Q&As, and surveys directly within a presentation, TeamRetro lacks these concise and user-friendly integrations which could impair the user experience.

Pick #6


EasyRetro, also known as FunRetro, is a digital board solution designed to facilitate retrospectives for agile teams. Unlike Slido which is more focused on providing interactive Q&As, polls, and engagement in large meetings or events, EasyRetro’s core functionality is around facilitating the agile retrospective process. It allows teams to interactively and asynchronously post, discuss, and prioritize feedback and tasks in a straight-forward, visually engaging manner. Its main focus is on improving team communication and productivity, making it a suitable alternative if the main purpose is to conduct agile retrospectives rather than broader audience engagement.

Enhanced Collaboration - EasyRetro simplifies the collaboration process during retrospectives. Unlike Slido, which primarily focuses on Q&A and polling, EasyRetro offers interactive collaborative boards where users can freely express thoughts, ideas, and discuss them.
Retrospective Techniques - EasyRetro comes with a variety of retrospective techniques built in the software. It provides multiple methods like starfish retro, start-stop-continue, etc., which are not available in Slido that mainly offers surveys.
Progress Tracking - EasyRetro enables tracking and following up on action items assigned during retrospectives, ensuring that feedback is acted upon and progress is monitored, something not covered extensively by Slido.
Customizability - EasyRetro provides a highly flexible and customizable interface that allows users to modify their boards according to their team's requirements. This feature is somewhat limited in Slido.
Agile and Scrum Specific - EasyRetro is tailored for Agile and Scrum environment which makes it an excellent choice for software development teams. Slido, while useful, does not specialize in this kind of environment.
EasyRetro is primarily a retrospective tool for Agile teams and lacks the live polling and interactive Q&A features offered by Slido. This could potentially limit real-time engagement during meetings or presentations.
EasyRetro does not have a slide integration feature like Slido, which allows users to seamlessly integrate polls and interactive elements into their slide presentations.
EasyRetro does not offer as many analytics features as Slido. This would limit the ability to gather insights from audience engagement and interaction.
The user interface of EasyRetro, designed for retrospectives, may not be as clean and clear for a live event, presentation or meeting scenario (where quick responses and easy navigation are important) compared to Slido.
EasyRetro lacks multi-language support, unlike Slido, which offers localized versions in multiple languages. This could limit its utility for international meetings or events.

Pick #7


SessionLab is a dynamic tool used for planning and designing workshops, training, meetings, and similar collaborative events. As an alternative to meeting engagement software like Slido, SessionLab offers unique capabilities such as a robust workshop planner that enables users to create structured agendas, facilitate real-time collaboration, and generate professional-looking exports. It also provides a comprehensive library of professional methods and templates for different event types, fostering creativity and efficiency in planning. While it doesn’t inherently possess the interactive polling or Q&A functions akin to Slido, SessionLab primarily shines in its upfront design and planning of workshops and meetings, ultimately fostering efficient organization and workflow for facilitators.

Advanced workshop planning: SessionLab prides itself on providing a superior workshop planning tool. This isn't just about simple meeting agendas; users can design complex, interactive workshop plans that involve different activities, timings, and roles.
Collaborative design: SessionLab offers real-time collaborative planning, which means that you and your team can all work together on the planning phase of your workshops, regardless of your physical location.
Extensive library of facilitation techniques: The platform boasts an extensive library of workshop methods and facilitation techniques that are employed by professionals worldwide. This allows users to learn from experts and apply tried-and-tested strategies to their own workshops.
Customizable templates: With SessionLab, you can utilize customizable templates for your workshop or training plan. The drag-and-drop functionality makes it incredibly user-friendly, even for those without technical expertise.
Time tracking: One of the key features of SessionLab is the ability to track time during your workshop. The built-in timer function follows your planned agenda and helps to ensure that your workshop stays on track.
Limited Audience Interaction - Unlike Slido which thrives on real-time audience interaction, SessionLab primarily focuses on planning and designing workshops. This means it may not be as competent in capturing real-time responses or facilitating Q&A sessions.
Lack of Polling & Survey Features - Slido specializes in creating different types of polls and surveys, and analyzing results graphically in real time. SessionLab, however, lacks these features as its main focus is to structure workshops.
Less Efficient in Managing Large Events - Slido is designed to manage large audiences and events, while SessionLab is mainly used for designing smaller workshops, training sessions, or meetings which might limit its functionality when dealing with larger scale events.
Lack of Direct Integration with Presentation Tools - Unlike Slido that directly integrates into PowerPoint, Google Slides, and more, SessionLab does not provide such convenience, which may lead to issues when trying to coordinate your workshop structure with presentation slides.
Absence of Anonymous Feedbacks - With Slido, participants can provide anonymous feedback or ask questions anonymously. Such feature isn't available in SessionLab which can limit the types of feedback and the level of openness among attendees.

Pick #8


Stormz is an innovative, collaborative software specifically designed to promote effective engagement within meetings and workshops. Similar to Slido’s meeting engagement software, Stormz facilitates real-time interaction and communication, enabling users to brainstorm, evaluate, plan and make decisions together within a digital workspace, whether in-person or remotely. However, while Slido prioritizes audience interaction through polls and Q&A sessions, Stormz provides a broader range of functionality, such as ideation, prioritization, action planning, and more. This makes it a comprehensive alternative capable of supporting the entire collaborative process from generating ideas to transforming them into actionable plans.

benefit 1:Intuitive Collaborative Features: Unlike Slido, Stormz offers a suite of collaborative features, allowing users to collectively brainstorm, discuss, vote, and co-design in real time. This enhances team engagement and promotes creativity in a democratic manner.
benefit 2:Workshop Oriented: Stormz is designed to facilitate digital workshops with predefined templates and detailed guides on conducting efficient workshops. Slido primarily focuses on live Q&A and polling while Stormz is more centered around collective brainstorming and decision-making.
benefit 3:Participant Evaluation Metrics: With Stormz, you have an inbuilt system to evaluate participation metrics. It allows leaders to track and assess the involvement of each participant, which is not an inherent feature in Slido.
benefit 4:Detailed Summary of Sessions: Post-session, Stormz delivers a detailed report of the entire session including participations, responses, and visual mapping which can be exported easily for presentations or to analyze. This is not a standard feature in Slido.
benefit 5:Versatile Grouping Options: Stormz provides more versatile grouping options. Whether for ideation, decision-making, problem-solving sessions, you can form groups real-time, or based on predefined criteria - a level of flexibility not seen in Slido.
Unlike Slido, which works as a standalone tool, Stormz is specifically designed for use within a framework of other tools. When used as a stand-alone tool in the capacity of Slido, functionality could be compromised.
Stormz has its primary focus on collaborative ideation and team brainstorming sessions, which means it may lack the polished Q&A and live poll features that a platform like Slido is known for.
The interface in Stormz can be a bit complex when compared to the relatively straightforward and minimalist design of Slido, leading to potential usability issues for those who aren’t as tech-savvy.
While Slido significantly supports real-time audience engagement like live polls, surveys, and Q&A, Stormz may fall short in this regard as it is not primarily designed for large audience engagement.
Unlike Slido, which is renowned for its strong integration with platforms like PowerPoint, Google Slides, or Zoom, the lack of such robust integration in Stormz could be a disadvantage when it's used as a Slido alternative.

Pick #9


Klaxoon is a leading collaboration and engagement platform designed for hybrid and remote teams that offers an alternative to the meeting engagement software Slido. Klaxoon provides a variety of interactive features including quizzes, surveys, live polling, idea management tools, and more, to foster collaboration and active participation in meetings or workshops. Its aim is to make team meetings more efficient and engaging by enhancing communication, idea generation, and decision-making processes. Unlike Slido, Klaxoon also includes tools specifically designed to facilitate brainstorming and complex problem-solving sessions, making it a more comprehensive solution for managing team interaction and productivity.

Integration Capabilities: Klaxoon can seamlessly integrate with other popular software applications such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Google Drive. This allows for a more efficient data flow and promotes collaborative work environments.
Enhanced Engagement: Klaxoon offers comprehensive interactive features like quizzes, surveys, and brainstorming activities. These elements can significantly improve engagement during meetings, training sessions, or workshops.
Synchronization of Audio and Visual Content: One unique feature that sets Klaxoon apart from Slido is the ability to synchronize audiovisual content. This further enhances the quality of shared information during meetings and makes it easier to understand complex concepts.
Offline Capabilities: Klaxoon also provides offline capabilities where participants can join a session and engage using the digital whiteboard without a continual internet connection. This makes it functional in various settings even those with poor connectivity.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Klaxoon provides a comprehensive dashboard which can track participant activity in real-time. This includes useful analytics of quizzes, and interactive polls, allowing an organizer to understand participant behavior better.
Klaxoon requires a certain degree of technological expertise and learning curve to effectively operate, unlike Slido which has a much more user-friendly interface.
While Slido allows real-time voting and quickly displays results, Klaxoon's advanced features can cause a delay in these processes due to its more complex functionalities.
Klaxoon does not integrate as seamlessly with PowerPoint as Slido does, making it less convenient for presenters who utilise PowerPoint extensively.
Klaxoon's focus on teamwork and collaboration can be overkill for users who simply need a straightforward audience response tool like Slido.
Compared to Slido, Klaxoon can be perceived as ‘too comprehensive’, and some of its features may not be necessary for certain audiences or events, leading to underutilisation.

Pick #10


MeetingPulse is a comprehensive and interactive meeting tool designed to make conferences, workshops, or corporate meetings more engaging and efficient. It serves as an excellent alternative to Slido as it features efficient real-time polling, anonymous Q&A sessions, live audience feedback, and quizzes to foster participant interaction. It also supports seamless integration with major collaboration platforms for enhanced functionality. MeetingPulse’s interface is user-friendly, making it easier for users to navigate, capture meeting analytics, and promote a more productive environment during virtual and in-person meetings.

Comprehensive Real-Time Interaction - MeetingPulse offers an integrated solution for live polling, Q&A sessions, and general feedback in real-time. This is unlike Slido which primarily focuses on Q&A and poll features, hence adding more scope for interaction in virtual meetings.
Customizable User Interface - MeetingPulse allows users to customize the appearance of their interface according to their brand’s aesthetics. This provides a personalized user experience that is lacking in Slido.
Advanced Analytics - MeetingPulse gives a comprehensive analysis of audience engagement metrics like participation rates, user moods, and opinion trends. Thus, it offers a deeper insight into the effectiveness of meetings or events compared to Slido.
Functionality for Large-Scale Meetings - MeetingPulse is designed to accommodate a large audience effectively, for example in town halls, webinars, or large corporate meetings, a feature not so prominent in Slido.
Audience Empathy Map - MeetingPulse offers a unique feature of creating an empathy map, which helps to understand the user experiences on a deeper level. This cognitive tool helps in gaining insights into audience emotional responses, a feature which is not available in Slido.
MeetingPulse may not offer as many polling question types as Slido, limiting the kind of feedback you can solicit during meetings.
MeetingPulse's interface is not as intuitive or user-friendly as Slido's, potentially causing confusion for first-time users or tech-challenged individuals.
Slido has the added feature of Slido Switcher that allows more than one person to manage a single event, a useful feature which is absent in MeetingPulse.
MeetingPulse has a less effective Q&A moderation feature compared to Slido, making managing audience input slightly more difficult.
While Slido provides integration with platforms like PowerPoint, Google Slides and Teams, the list of direct Integration options with MeetingPulse is lesser and it may require additional work or software to integrate with various platforms.


Slido is an ideal choice for interactive presentations, webinars, and meetings where engaging your audience is key. It shines in scenarios that demand real-time engagement, such as Q&A sessions, live polls, and feedback collection. If your event or gathering aims to foster a collaborative environment where participants’ opinions and questions play a central role, Slido’s intuitive interface and robust audience interaction tools make it the go-to software. Its capacity to seamlessly integrate with popular presentation and video conferencing platforms enhances its suitability for diverse educational, corporate, and networking events, aligning with the needs of organizers looking to bridge the gap between speakers and attendees.

On the other hand, when your requirements extend beyond interactive features to include more comprehensive event management capabilities such as registration, ticketing, or detailed attendee analytics, it may be wise to consider an alternative software product. If your priority is hosting large-scale virtual events that necessitate a broader range of functionalities including advanced marketing tools, networking opportunities, or virtual exhibition spaces, alternatives tailored to these specific demands might offer a more fitting solution. In circumstances where the focus is on extensive event lifecycle management or creating immersive virtual event experiences, exploring other software options can help you find a platform that aligns more closely with your sophisticated event hosting objectives.

Top 10: Best Slido Alternative