The 10 Best SessionLab Alternatives

Explore various alternatives to SessionLab that offer a range of features such as meeting and workshop planning, collaborative tools, interactive whiteboard functions, and more.

Despite SessionLab being a robust meeting engagement software, someone might seek alternatives due to various reasons. While SessionLab offers vital functionalities such as workshop planning, real-time collaboration, and session timing, it can be less intuitive for beginners and might not fit smaller budgets due to its pricing model. Others might prefer a software that presents additional features such as built-in video conferencing, task management, or integration with larger project management systems. Moreover, potential performance issues, customer service quality, or the need for specific customizations better catered by other software, could also encourage potential users to explore different options.

Why would you look for Sessionlab Alternative alternative?

In the quest for efficient and streamlined session planning, professionals today seek out platforms that offer both flexibility and a comprehensive set of features. While SessionLab has been a go-to for many, it’s not uncommon to look for alternatives that might cater more specifically to evolving needs. This could stem from a desire for more advanced collaborative features, allowing teams to work simultaneously with real-time updates or seeking a platform with more customizable templates that better fit the unique structure of their workshops or meetings. Additionally, integration capabilities with other tools and software commonly used by organizations can be a significant factor, ensuring a seamless workflow and reducing the time spent toggling between applications.

Another reason to explore alternatives to SessionLab hinges on user experience and cost-effectiveness. As budgets tighten and user expectations rise, there’s a growing demand for software solutions that are not only affordable but also intuitive and easy to navigate, minimizing the learning curve for new users. The perfect tool should empower facilitators and educators to design and execute their sessions effortlessly, without compromising on quality or functionality. In essence, finding an alternative might not be about the shortcomings of SessionLab itself but about seeking a solution that aligns more closely with specific requirements, whether they be financial, functional, or user-centric.

The Best Products

Sessionlab Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, an innovative cloud-based platform for meeting notes, augments team synergy by revolutionizing methods for creating, organizing and distributing meeting notes. Working in real-time, ZipDo supports collaborative editing, syncing with commonly used calendars and productivity tools to become a vital asset for teams of all sizes.

Distinctively, it’s possible to view ZipDo’s real-time note-taking in action alongside a Meeting Facilitation Software, ensuring everyone is synchronized during meetings and putting an end to traditional note-passing. Upon the meeting’s conclusion, team members can smoothly adjust and contribute to the notes for the latest data.

ZipDo excels in arranging notes, offering straightforward categorization into channels or folders. This works seamlessly with Meeting Facilitation Software, enhancing the fluidity of information management among team members. Searchable notes amplify efficiency, making it direct to find particular data without tiresome scrolling or manual searches.

With a detailed access control system, ZipDo’s capability for note sharing ensures the secure distribution of information with team members, clients, or partners — an excellent addition when using Meeting Facilitation Software. Calendar integrations further simplify collated note creation for each meeting, removing the hassle of manual entries.

To conclude, ZipDo offers a user-friendly platform that enriches team productivity, collaboration, and project management when used alongside Meeting Facilitation Software. Its real-time note-taking, collaborative editing, organizational tools, searchability, sharing ability, and integrations render it expertise, enhancing meeting management and ensuring projects are progressing efficiently.

Pick #2

Butter is an engaging, user-friendly alternative to traditional Meeting Engagement Software like SessionLab. While SessionLab focusses heavily on providing a suite for session planning for trainers and facilitators, Butter offers a more integrated and interactive platform for hosting digital workshops, team meetings, and online classes. Additional features include collaborative whiteboards, break-out rooms and polling systems, thereby increasing interactivity, participation, and ease of use. Its interactive nature makes it an optimal choice for those wanting a dynamic and collaborative remote meeting environment.

It seems like there might be a misunderstanding. Butter, the dairy product, can't be used as an alternative to SessionLab, a workshop planning and design tool.
But if you're referring to a software or platform named 'Butter', which has features similar to SessionLab, I would need more specific information about it to provide an accurate answer. If you can provide that, I'd be happy to help!
Although Butter may seem similar on the surface as a tool for session planning and facilitation, there are several notable disadvantages when compared to dedicated tools like SessionLab.
Butter may lack advanced facilitation features that SessionLab offers. SessionLab is designed specifically for planning and running workshop sessions with features like time blocks, color-coding and printing session plans. These facilitation specific features might not be present in Butter.
Butter might not possess the same level of integrations as SessionLab. SessionLab integrates well with other software like Google Drive, allowing for easy collaboration and sharing. If Butter does not have such integrations, it can hinder workflows for teams who depend on them.
Butter may not be as user-friendly when it comes to organizing complex sessions. SessionLab's intuitive design allows for clear session structuring and visual timelines, thus simplifying the overall planning process.
Butter might lack the multi-user collaboration features that SessionLab offers. With SessionLab, multiple members of a team can work together on planning and running a session in real time.
SessionLab offers a vast library of workshop activities that can be dragged and dropped into your session plan for ease of use. If Butter does not offer such a feature, it could result in a lot of extra time and effort to plan a session or workshop.

Pick #3


Parabol is a robust, user-friendly software designed to facilitate agile teamwork and streamline digital workflows. As an alternative to meeting engagement platforms like SessionLab, Parabol offers a wide range of features that support everything from synchronized task tracking and progress monitoring, to effective retrospective meetings and sprint planning. Its interactive interface encourages efficient collaborative work, while its integration capabilities with platforms like Slack, GitHub, and Jira ensure a seamless workflow. Overall, Parabol provides a more agile-focused, task-oriented solution compared to comprehensive meeting planning solutions like SessionLab.

Enhanced agile methodologies: Parabol is designed with agile teams in mind and offers easy integration with common agile methodologies like Scrum or Kanban. As a SessionLab alternative, Parabol provides features like sprint planning, retrospectives, and progress tracking that perfectly fit into agile project management.
Real-time Collaboration: Parabol offers real-time collaboration tools. Team members can work together flexibly irrespective of their location. It provides shared working spaces, collaborative editing of lists, reflections, and more.
Integration Capabilities: Parabol seamlessly integrates with popular tools like Slack, GitHub, and Jira. This allows for more efficient workflow as users can stay within a single platform to accomplish a variety of tasks, reducing the need for toggling between apps.
Task Management: Parabol's task management system is more defined. It allows users to prioritize tasks, assign them to team members, and track their progress up to completion. It handles task dependencies effectively, which is an added boon for project management.
Meeting Functionality: Parabol stands out with its meeting functionality. It allows for guided meetings for sprint plans, retrospectives, and check-ins. It can automatically generate summaries of these meetings and distribute these to the team, ensuring that everyone is kept in the loop.
Parabol does not offer as extensive a library of facilitation techniques and workshop agendas as SessionLab does, which could limit its utility for those seeking creative and varied resources for session planning.
SessionLab allows for real-time collaborative planning whereas Parabol only supports retrospective and stand-up meetings, thus reducing spontaneous collaborative abilities.
In Parabol, all tasks and projects revolve around the Agile Scrum or Kanban methodologies, which might not appeal to teams that do not follow these specific frameworks, unlike Sessionlab with a broader approach to project management.
SessionLab offers time-block based session planning which makes it easier for workshop facilitators to manage time effectively, whereas Parabol does not include a specific feature for this.
Parabol doesn't offer a seamless way to switch methods in a meeting. In SessionLab, you can easily switch methods and choose a method that suits you best, depending on your current goals, the energy level of the team, and the time available.

Pick #4


GoRetro is a collaborative, online platform used primarily for facilitating agile retrospectives and sprint planning. It provides an alternative to SessionLab’s meeting engagement software. Like SessionLab, GoRetro offers a range of tools that enable teams to reflect on their performance, collaborate, and plan improvements. This includes features for note-taking, voting, categorizing comments, and creating action plans. However, it differentiates itself through its focus on agile methodologies and its features specifically built for software development teams, such as Sprint Planning tools. Its user-friendly design, coupled with effective real-time collaboration functionality and robust analytics make it an advantageous choice for software development teams seeking to improve their workflow.

Advanced Features for Retrospectives - GoRetro specializes in Scrum retrospectives. It offers detailed and specific functionalities for conducting efficient retrospectives, such as star ratings, filtering and sorting, customizable columns and seamless integration with JIRA.
User Interface - GoRetro boasts a smooth and visually-attractive interface. It's streamlined and playful design not only makes it fun to use but can also help to stimulate creative thinking during retrospectives.
Anonymous Participation - GoRetro provides an option for anonymous participation. This feature is beneficial for those team members who prefer to give their unbiased opinion without being identified, promoting honesty and transparency within the team.
Functional Reporting - With GoRetro, you can generate easy-to-understand, functional reports which include metrics such as the number of action points, likes, comments, etc. These can be especially helpful to track the progress over time and evaluate the team's performance.
Cloud-Based Software - Being a cloud-based software, GoRetro offers easy accessibility from any device with an internet connection. It also ensures real-time updates for all participants, and eliminates the need for installing and updating any software.
Limited Customization – While SessionLab provides a rich variety of pre-designed templates, GoRetro has a relatively rigid structure, making it less flexible for customization to meet unique business needs.
Lesser Advanced Workshop Tools – SessionLab has a range of advanced tools designed for hosting workshops, brainstorming sessions, etc., which GoRetro lacks.
Absence of Time Planning Feature – SessionLab comes with a notable feature of time planning for different sessions in a workshop, which is not available in GoRetro, making it less suitable for workshop planning.
Limited Facilitation Tools – GoRetro does not have the extensive facilitation tools offered by SessionLab, that are aimed at managing group dynamics effectively during a workshop or meeting.
No Built-in Video Conferencing – unlike SessionLab, GoRetro does not have built-in video conferencing capability, requiring users to utilize third-party software for remote meetings.

Pick #5


Mentimeter is an interactive presentation tool that serves as an alternative to the Meeting Engagement Software SessionLab. It is designed to facilitate interactive and engaging meetings, conferences or classrooms through real-time surveys, polls and quizzes. With Mentimeter, presenters can initiate active participation, gain audience insights, and promote real-time discussions. While similar to SessionLab in terms of enabling dynamic sessions, the prime differentiation stems from Mentimeter’s focus on real-time audience participation and feedback, compared to SessionLab’s emphasis on session design and facilitation.

Real-time Polling: Mentimeter has an edge over SessionLab with its dynamic, real-time polling abilities. It encourages audience engagement and lets them submit real-time responses during presentations or meetings.
Interactive Presentations: With Mentimeter, you can create interactive presentations directly on the platform itself, which might be more convenient than designing in another software and then uploading it to SessionLab.
Variety of Question Types: Mentimeter offers a wider variety of question types, including multiple-choice, open-ended, 2x2 matrix, and scales. This can make data collection and audience engagement much more dynamic than when using SessionLab.
Audience Size: Mentimeter has superior capacity to support larger audiences than SessionLab. Whether you are conducting a seminar or business meeting, Mentimeter effectively gets real-time feedback from a large number of participants.
Ease of Use: According to user reviews, Mentimeter has a more intuitive, user-friendly interface, making it easier to set up presentations and distribute them to participants than with SessionLab.
Mentimeter is primarily a polling and interactive presentation tool, whereas SessionLab is more facilitated towards workshop designing and planning. The former lacks the detailed planning and documentation capabilities of the latter making it less suitable for complex session planning.
SessionLab offers collaboration in real time which allows multiple team members to interact on the same project simultaneously, this feature is not as robust in Mentimeter.
With SessionLab, users can access a public library of workshop activities and methods curated by other users, offering opportunity for creativity, new ideas and inspiration. This extended library and community involvement is not available in Mentimeter. SessionLab provides better time management tools, such as a timing tool that keeps track of how long each activity should take to ensure a workshop or meeting stays on schedule. This is an aspect that Mentimeter does not possess.
The functionality of SessionLab to provide per module note-taking and detailed explanatory features for elaborate agenda building is missing in Mentimeter, making Mentimeter a less efficient tool for designing workshops or extensive planning.

Pick #6

Team Retro

TeamRetro is an online retrospective meeting tool designed to help agile teams conduct effective sprint reflections and enhance their workflow efficiency, serving as an alternative to This platform allows teams to gauge their work performance, identify challenges, celebrate achievements and define actionable steps for continuous improvement. With a user-friendly interface and various engaging features such as real-time voting, brainstorming boards, temperature checks, and privacy mode, TeamRetro facilitates effective team collaboration, meeting engagement, and decision-making processes remotely or on-premise, while ensuring the insights and data are documented for future reference.

Advanced Retro Formats: TeamRetro offers a wide variety of retrospective formats that are both modernized and interactive, making the team collaboration process more engaging.
Easy Scaling: TeamRetro allows you to effectively manage retrospective meetings for both small and large teams. This flexible scalability is a major selling point for organizations of different sizes and types.
Action-oriented Results: Unlike SessionLab, TeamRetro emphasizes on identifying actionable outcomes from retrospectives. This enables the team to focus on real change and improvements rather than just identifying problems.
Automated Reporting System: TeamRetro automatically generates insightful reports post-session that summarize the key points, actions, and votes. This feature saves time and helps in better understanding of the team's decisions.
Third-Party Integrations: TeamRetro can be integrated with various other tools like Slack, Jira, Trello, etc., offering a seamless and efficient workflow even when several development tools are involved.
Limited Activity Types- Unlike SessionLab which offers a wide range of activity types like brainstorming, prioritizing, understanding, decision making etc, TeamRetro is mainly focused on agile retrospectives. Therefore, if a team wants to engage in diverse activities, they may find TeamRetro less beneficial.
Inflexible Framework- SessionLab provides the option of building your own custom tools, methodologies, and exercises, whereas TeamRetro operates within a more fixed framework. This may limit its utility for custom needs and innovation.
Not Primarily a Workshop Planning Tool- Unlike SessionLab which is a dedicated workshop planning tool, TeamRetro is essentially a retrospective tool. This means it may not offer the same depth and efficiencies for planning, running and documenting workshops.
Limited Collaboration Options- SessionLab allows facilitators to add collaborators, clients or observers with various levels of access. TeamRetro might not offer the same level of collaborative versatility as SessionLab.
Absence of a Resource Library- SessionLab offers a library of ready-to-use methods and templates authored by the global facilitation community, which can be a considerable planning and timesaving feature. This is a feature which TeamRetro does not offer.

Pick #7


EasyRetro, also known as FunRetro, is a digital platform designed to facilitate retrospective meetings in agile work environments, thereby offering an alternative to meeting engagement software like SessionLab. It provides a user-friendly interface where teams can analyze their performance, discuss improvements, and plan their next steps. A variety of pre-made and customizable templates are at teams’ disposal, with options to add, delete, or edit cards in real-time. While EasyRetro focuses specifically on retrospective functions, it parallels SessionLab’s goal of enhancing productivity and fostering effective team collaboration in an online space.

Dedicated Retrospective Tool: Unlike SessionLab, EasyRetro is a dedicated retrospective tool. This allows for more tailored and robust features for conducting agile retrospectives including a variety of template designs and a focus on capturing feedback in an effective manner.
Real-Time Collaboration: Easyretro has features to allow teams to contribute in real-time, this is especially beneficial for distributed teams where collaboration can be a challenge and is not as proficient in SessionLab.
FunRetro Compatibility: EasyRetro is the new FunRetro. This means if a team was using FunRetro previously, they can move to EasyRetro without having to undergo any significant changes or learning curves, which is not guaranteed when switching to SessionLab.
Anonymous Voting: EasyRetro has an Anonymous voting feature that can be useful to maintain anonymity during retrospectives and gather honest feedback. This might not be as easy in SessionLab.
Themed Boards: EasyRetro offers themed boards to keep retrospectives exciting and engaging. While SessionLab does offer customization, it does not have the same level of theming available, which makes EasyRetro stand out.
EasyRetro might lack depth in different types of facilitation processes. SessionLab is not just a tool for running retrospectives, it is also a platform for designing workshops and meetings of all sorts, which might offer more flexibility.
EasyRetro primarily focuses on retrospectives and feedback loops. In comparison, SessionLab offers a broader range of features for session planning, time management, and activity libraries which EasyRetro does not provide.
EasyRetro allows for voting on cards but lacks the qualitative analysis tools provided by SessionLab. This creates a limitation when it comes to sorting out issues and getting to their root cause.
SessionLab offers the ability to plan and script session activities in a timeline view, a feature that EasyRetro lacks. This might limit the user’s ability to plan sessions effectively.
EasyRetro doesn’t provide the public library of workshop designs that SessionLab does. This is a huge constraint for users looking to draw on existing resources to design their sessions.

Pick #8


Slido is an interactive technology tool aimed at enhancing communication and boosting engagement during live meetings, conferences, and webinars. It serves as an alternative to the Meeting Engagement Software SessionLab. Slido offers features like real-time polling, Q&A sessions, quizzes, and audience analytics, allowing for immediate feedback and increased interactivity between presenters and attendees. Compared to SessionLab, Slido focuses more on real-time interaction rather than session design and planning. It encourages audience participation, thereby fostering an engaging and collaborative environment during meetings and events.

Real-time Interaction - Slido provides a platform for real-time interaction with features like live polls and Q&A sessions, which can be more engaging for audience members than the typical workshop formats offered by Sessionlab.
User Engagement - Slido incorporates elements of gamification, such as quizzes and competitions, which can motivate participants and increase their active involvement and engagement in the session.
Consolidated Feedback - Slido gathers all audience input in one place, allowing facilitators to easily sift through and manage feedback. This could offer a more streamlined approach than navigating through various separate documents and features on Sessionlab.
Integration Capabilities - Slido can be integrated with video conferencing tools like Zoom and Microsoft Teams, providing smooth operations for remote meetings or workshops. This feature can help make up for Sessionlab's more limited integration options.
Accessibility - Slido provides a smoother experience for large-scale events or conferences with hundreds of participants, whereas Sessionlab may be more geared towards smaller, more intimate workshop settings. With Slido, participants can simply join events using a code, no need for extensive setup or account creation.
Slido is primarily a Q&A and polling tool, therefore it lacks comprehensive session planning and workshop design facilities compared to SessionLab.
SessionLab provides an opportunity to access a library of methods and workshop templates created by other users, while Slido has no such feature.
Slido lacks robust facilitation tools such as timers, notes, and file attachments, all of which are easily incorporated into SessionLab's session plans.
Slido does not provide end-to-end workshop flow creation capabilities while SessionLab allows users to design and structure workshops or meetings from start to end.
SessionLab allows in-plan collaboration among team members to co-create session plans. You can’t co-design and simultaneously work on a single plan in Slido.

Pick #9


Stormz is a collaborative online platform that offers an interactive pathway to facilitate and optimize group meetings, workshops, and brainstorming sessions. It designs a structured yet engaging environment for teams to generate ideas, formulate strategies, prioritize tasks, and foster discussions, similarly to Sessionlab. Stormz leverages its tools such as whiteboards, sticky notes, voting polls, and a digital library to create a versatile and inclusive space for remote or in-person teams. Also, its customizable facilitation techniques and real-time progress visibility provide a comprehensive view of participants’ engagement and ideas, making it a robust alternative to the Meeting Engagement Software such as SessionLab.

Enhanced Collaboration Features: Stormz allows users to annotate, comment, and vote on ideas in real-time. This provides a dynamic and interactive environment for team collaboration, often resulting in richer discussions and more comprehensive results.
Scalability: Stormz can handle large groups making it an ideal solution for big enterprises where a large number of participants may be involved in a brainstorming or workshop session.
Diversified Workshop Templates: Stormz provides several ready-made workshop templates based on popular methods such as the Business Model Canvas, SWOT analysis, etc. These templates can provide valuable starting points for discussions and brainstorming sessions.
Synchronous and Asynchronous Participation: Stormz supports both synchronous (real-time) and asynchronous collaboration, making it highly useful for remote and distributed teams with time-zone differences.
Integration with Popular Tools: Stormz integrates well with popular tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, providing seamless conversations and updates across platforms. This is particularly beneficial for teams that already use these tools for their workflow.
Limited customization options: Unlike SessionLab, Stormz doesn't offer as much flexibility in terms of customization. This can limit the way you design and run your facilitation sessions.
Demands high-performance hardware: Stormz requires a relatively fast internet connection and high-performance computer for smooth operation, unlike SessionLab that runs well even in moderate infrastructure.
Less advanced facilitation features: Stormz is designed as a more generic brainstorming and collaboration tool. In comparison, SessionLab is specifically built for facilitators with advanced features like session timing, collaborator roles, etc.
Supported platforms: SessionLab is more versatile, being accessible from any device with an internet connection, while Stormz has platform limitations hampering user access and work mobility.
Limited libraries of templates: SessionLab offers a wide range of pre-made templates to help kickstart the planning process. However, Stormz lacks this advantage, making the process time-consuming for users who need to start from scratch each time.

Pick #10


Klaxoon is a versatile and comprehensive collaborative platform that serves as an excellent alternative to meeting engagement software such as SessionLab. It is designed to improve the efficiency of team collaboration and interaction, focusing on activities such as brainstorming, surveys, quizzes, and challenges. Klaxoon provides various tools to foster engagement and interaction in any meeting setting, whether remote or in-person. Its robust features, including real-time collaboration, meeting management, brainstorming tools, and interactive presentations, make it possible to enhance productivity and promotes active participation within meetings.

Comprehensive Meeting Management: Klaxoon offers robust features for managing meetings such as dynamic agendas, real-time collaborative boards, and meeting polls. This is considerably different from SessionLab's primary focus on planning and designing workshops and sessions.
Real-Time Participation Tracking: Klaxoon provides the ability to monitor participants' engagement in real-time. Through features like voting, questionnaires, or challenges, users can interact and engage more effectively.
Integration with External Tools: Klaxoon offers native integration with several productivity tools including Microsoft Teams, Slack, and Google Drive which extends its usability.
Advanced Training Session Features: Klaxoon is designed not only for planning but also for executing training sessions. Its features allow trainers to create interactive quizzes, surveys, and courses, leading to a more dynamic and engaging learning environment.
Brainstorming and Idea Management: Klaxoon features rich brainstorming tools that allow for real-time idea sharing, tagging, and organization. This is a step ahead of SessionLab, which primarily focuses on session planning rather than interactive brainstorming.
Klaxoon doesn't offer a free option - Contrary to SessionLab which offers a free basic version, Klaxoon is a paid service from the start. So you may not be able to test out the system properly before investing in it.
Integrations - Klaxoon does not have wide options for third-party integrations. On the other hand, SessionLab supports integration with applications like Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Google Meet.
Limited Session Planning Features - Compared to SessionLab, Klaxoon offers fewer features for session planning. It can limit the level of detailed planning and execution that might be required in professional settings.
Less User-friendly Interface - Some users find Klaxoon's interface less intuitive compared to SessionLab. This could lead to a steeper learning curve and slower adoption rate amongst teams.
Limited Customization - Klaxoon offers fewer options for customization of workshops and meetings when compared to SessionLab. This can limit the flexibility and adaptability of the platform to diverse team needs.


SessionLab is the optimal choice for facilitators and trainers who prioritize interactive, meticulously planned workshops and meetings. It shines when the goal is to foster collaboration and engagement among participants, leveraging its comprehensive library of templates and facilitation techniques. Particularly suited for those who value a user-friendly interface for designing and structuring dynamic agendas, SessionLab excels in environments where flexibility and adaptability are key. Its real-time collaborative features make it a go-to for teams aiming to co-create and refine their session plans seamlessly.

On the other hand, seeking an alternative software product becomes relevant when your requirements extend beyond session planning to include integrated project management tools or when the need for advanced analytics and reporting features takes precedence. If your workflow demands extensive integration with other apps and services for a more unified ecosystem or if you’re operating within a tight budget constraint, exploring other options might be the sensible path. In scenarios where your focus shifts towards comprehensive event management, from attendee registration to post-event feedback collection, opting for a different platform that specializes in these broader functionalities would be advantageous.

Top 10: Best Sessionlab Alternative