The 10 Best Parabol Alternatives

Explore a variety of project management platforms that offer diverse features such as task tracking, real-time collaboration, agile workflow, and productivity improvement, serving as worthy alternatives to Parabol.

While Parabol is highly effective with features like retrospective meetings, check-in meetings, and sprint poker, it also has certain limitations which could drive users to seek alternatives. The software can be challenging for larger teams or organizations given its limited scale. It also lacks some features such as text chat during meetings, audio, and video capabilities within the app, which could impact communication. Furthermore, Parabol is largely focused on agile teams, making it less ideal for teams not utilizing agile methodologies. Users might also find the interface less intuitive compared to other tools, and the pricing may not be as competitive as other options in the market. For these reasons, users might search for a more comprehensive, user-friendly, and cost-effective alternative.

Why would you look for Alternative alternative?

When delving into the complexities of project management and team collaboration, finding a tool that seamlessly aligns with an organization’s unique workflow is paramount. Parabol-co has carved its niche in facilitating agile ceremonies and fostering team collaboration; however, its one-size-fits-all approach might not resonate with every business structure. Companies might seek alternatives to Parabol-co when they find its feature set too restrictive or its interface not intuitive enough for their specific project management strategies. The quest for a more customizable or user-friendly solution could drive businesses to explore other avenues that offer greater adaptability or a tailored user experience, ensuring that their project management tool is an enabler of efficiency, not a barrier.

Moreover, scalability and integration capabilities can significantly influence the decision to search for alternatives to Parabol-co. As organizations grow, they require software that can effortlessly scale with them, supporting a larger number of projects and team members without compromising performance. Likewise, the ability to integrate seamlessly with other tools used within the company, such as CRM systems, email platforms, and file-sharing services, is crucial for maintaining a streamlined workflow. If Parabol-co falls short in these aspects, companies might find themselves on the lookout for a solution that not only grows with them but also offers a more interconnected ecosystem, thereby enhancing overall productivity and collaboration.

The Best Products Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, an innovative cloud-based platform for meeting notes, augments team synergy by revolutionizing methods for creating, organizing and distributing meeting notes. Working in real-time, ZipDo supports collaborative editing, syncing with commonly used calendars and productivity tools to become a vital asset for teams of all sizes.

Distinctively, it’s possible to view ZipDo’s real-time note-taking in action alongside a Meeting Facilitation Software, ensuring everyone is synchronized during meetings and putting an end to traditional note-passing. Upon the meeting’s conclusion, team members can smoothly adjust and contribute to the notes for the latest data.

ZipDo excels in arranging notes, offering straightforward categorization into channels or folders. This works seamlessly with Meeting Facilitation Software, enhancing the fluidity of information management among team members. Searchable notes amplify efficiency, making it direct to find particular data without tiresome scrolling or manual searches.

With a detailed access control system, ZipDo’s capability for note sharing ensures the secure distribution of information with team members, clients, or partners — an excellent addition when using Meeting Facilitation Software. Calendar integrations further simplify collated note creation for each meeting, removing the hassle of manual entries.

To conclude, ZipDo offers a user-friendly platform that enriches team productivity, collaboration, and project management when used alongside Meeting Facilitation Software. Its real-time note-taking, collaborative editing, organizational tools, searchability, sharing ability, and integrations render it expertise, enhancing meeting management and ensuring projects are progressing efficiently.

Pick #2

GoRetro is an online platform designed to foster collaboration and streamline agile retrospectives, serving as an alternative to meeting engagement software like Much like Parabol, it assists teams in managing and conducting effective and engaging retrospective meetings within agile workflows. It features interactive boards for real-time collaboration, detailed reports for tracking progress and performance over time, and in-built templates to guide the retrospection process. However, is distinguished by its artificial intelligence capabilities which, enhances team interactions and productivity by providing actionable retrospectives insights. This can make it a powerful tool for businesses interested in harnessing AI to optimize their agile processes.

User-friendly Interface - offers a visually appealing and user-friendly interface. This makes the application easier to use and requires less time to adapt to, which may offer an advantage over
Seamless Integration - can seamlessly integrate with Jira, enabling users to easily create actionable items post-retrospective and track their progress, a feature which might not be as smoothly executed in Parabol.
Customization- offers the ability to customize boards, cards, and even retrospective templates according to the individual requirements of the team. This degree of customization allows for more flexibility according to specific needs.
Enhanced Collaboration - allows team members to collaborate in real-time and even like or vote up each other's cards, which promotes more interaction and aids in prioritizing issues or ideas.
Unlimited History- Unlike Parabol, provides unlimited history, allowing teams to go back and view all past retrospectives at any time. This can serve as a valuable resource for understanding progress, identifying recurring issues, and learning from past actions.
GoRetro lacks some advanced features that Parabol offers, such as project management tools, check-in meetings, and goal setting features.
GoRetro's interface is not as modern and user-friendly as Parabol's. It could be more challenging for non-technical users to manage and navigate.
GoRetro doesn’t integrate with third-party tools, unlike Parabol which integrates with tools like Slack, GitHub, and JIRA allowing for seamless project management.
In terms of scalability, GoRetro might not be your best option as it might be limited when it comes to accommodating larger teams or more significant projects, unlike Parabol.
Parabol allows for multi-select attributes which enhance sorting and drilling down into issues, this feature is not present in GoRetro, hence, it is less efficient in issue management.

Pick #3

mentimeter is an online software platform that uses real-time polling, quizzes, and surveys to enhance audience engagement during meetings, lessons, or presentations. As an alternative to, Mentimeter puts more emphasis on interactive participation with the audience rather than task management and agile meeting methods. While Parabol focuses on meeting organization, retrospectives, and check-ins, Mentimeter allows presenters to gather instant feedback through various voting options, encouraging participation and enhancing communication. With Mentimeter, users can dynamically interact with their audience, fostering an environment of active learning and discussion.

Interactive Presentations - While Parabol focuses on agile methodologies and workflow structuring, Mentimeter stands out with its presentation platform. It allows users to engage with their audience interactively, whether it's students or coworkers, through live polls, quizzes, and word clouds.
Instantaneous Feedback - Mentimeter excels in providing real-time feedback during presentations. This feature facilitates immediate responses during meetings and interactive sessions, fostering a more lively and collaborative environment compared to Parabol.
Simplified Visualisation of Complex Data - Mentimeter provides visually appealing and easy-to-comprehend graphs, charts, and word clouds. This feature makes it easy to present complex data in a comprehensible way, setting it apart from Parabol, which is more focused on project management.
Offline Presentations - Mentimeter ensures that users can download their presentations and use them offline, a feature that may not be available in Parabol. This can end up being extremely useful, especially in situations where there is no internet connection available.
Audience Participation - Mentimeter encourages interactive participation from the audience during presentations. They can vote or express opinions via their devices anonymously, promoting a more engaging interaction compared to traditional project management tools like Parabol.
Lack of Agile Management Features - Mentimeter is fundamentally a tool for creating polls and quizzes, while Parabol is an Agile meeting and project management tool. Using Mentimeter as a Parabol alternative might limit the advanced project management functionalities like spring planning, retrospectives and check-ins which Parabol offers.
Inadequate Collaboration Facilities - While Mentimeter allows for interactivity, its features are not as comprehensive as Parabol's. Parabol offers tools for in-depth team collaboration including multi-user task boards, the ability to comment, and tagging team members directly.
Constraints on Asynchronous Communication - Mentimeter does not support asynchronous communication to the same degree as Parabol. With Parabol, even team members who weren't present for a meeting can access a summary, and add their contributions whenever they're available.
Limited Integration Capabilities - Parabol offers direct integrations with other platforms such as GitHub and Jira for the smooth handling of tasks and projects. In contrast, Mentimeter has less flexibility in integration with other software and platforms.
Absence of Customizability - Parabol allows teams to customize their dashboards and workflow to better suit their unique needs. With Mentimeter, there's little scope to adapt the platform to the specific demands of your project or team.

Pick #4

Team Retro

TeamRetro is an online retrospective and brainstorming tool that enables distributed and in-office teams to perform insightful and interactive sprint retrospectives efficaciously. As an alternative to Parabol, a meeting engagement software, TeamRetro offers real-time, collaborative features for agile teams. It allows for in-depth team exploration and engagement, including private ideation, smart grouping, guided discussions, and automated actions. Its live reports allow for retrospective analytics, while its security and privacy features ensure data protection. Moreover, it facilitates seamless integrations with popular workflow tools such as Jira, Trello, and Slack.

User-Friendly Interface - TeamRetro has a clear and easy-to-navigate user interface that helps to create an intuitive experience, which is especially beneficial for new users who may not be as technologically well-versed.
Enhanced Pre-Defined Templates - TeamRetro offers a broad array of pre-defined retrospective templates. This can save time and inspire teams to root out issues they might not have considered otherwise.
Integration Capability - TeamRetro offers integration with agile project management tools such as JIRA, Confluence, Trello, and Slack. This enables teams to seamlessly link their retrospectives and action plans with their project management tools.
Customization - TeamRetro enables users to fully customize their retro boards to suit the unique needs and preferences of their teams. This includes everything from the style of the board to the specific categories and items included.
Anonymity feature - TeamRetro provides an anonymity feature that allows team members to share their true feelings without any apprehension. This creates a safe space for open communication and can encourage more honest feedback.
Limited User Interface Customizability - TeamRetro lacks the level of user interface customization that Parabol offers. Parabol allows users to adjust and personalize their dashboard to better suit their unique team's needs, facilitating an easier experience.
Absence of Seamless Task Integration - Unlike Parabol, TeamRetro lacks seamless integration with task management tools. Parabol integrates with tools like Jira and GitHub, allowing teams to directly link retrospectives to action items.
Lack of Real-Time Update Feature - TeamRetro does not have a real-time update feature which is readily available in Parabol. In Parabol, updates happen instantly, allowing all team members to stay on the same page during live retrospectives.
Limited Automatic Task assignment - TeamRetro does not offer automatic task assignment based on retro results which is a feature present in Parabol. This feature in Parabol helps in evenly distributing the workload.
Lack of Collaboration Features – While both platforms facilitate online retrospectives, Parabol provides a broader set of tools to foster collaboration. It offers features such as shared notetaking and group discussion boards that are not present in TeamRetro's current base feature set.

Pick #5


EasyRetro, also known as FunRetro, is a powerful online tool designed to facilitate agile retrospectives for distributed teams. Similar to Parabol, it provides a platform for teams to collaborate, share feedback, and discuss improvements to enhance productivity and workflow. While Parabol is more than just a retrospective tool, offering features like task tracking and multi-meeting type support, EasyRetro mainly focuses on simplicity and visual representation of retrospectives, making it a user-friendly alternative to more complex platforms like Parabol.

User-Friendly Interface: EasyRetro has a straightforward and sleek design that is easy to navigate, even for non-technical users. Users can easily create new boards, add cards, and move them between different columns.
Simplified Voting System: EasyRetro offers a simplified voting system where users can prioritize their choices. This feature is very useful for quick decision making.
Board Customization: EasyRetro allows users to customize their retro boards significantly. Users can adjust columns, alter the number of votes per person, and more thereby offering more flexibility to fit different team’s needs.
Convenient Summary Reports: After each retro, EasyRetro automatically generates a summary report of what was discussed, which can be shared with the team. These reports can also be very handy for record-keeping purposes.
Multilingual Support: EasyRetro provides multilingual support. It offers team collaboration even for teams with members who do not have a common language. It supports multiple languages which can help in improved team collaboration.
Limited Agile Focus - EasyRetro, unlike Parabol, is not designed specifically for agile retrospectives. Parabol's advanced features cater to agile teams following Scrum, Kanban, or other Agile methodologies while EasyRetro does not offer them.
No Parallel Collaboration - In EasyRetro, users can't create cards simultaneously which can limit the interactive element of team retrospectives compared with the real-time collaboration in Parabol.
Lack of Integration - Parabol integrates directly with widely used project management tools like GitHub and Jira, and also with Slack for communication. On the other hand, EasyRetro does not offer such integrations, which could limit efficient workflows for some teams.
Absence of Check-in Meetings - Parabol provides a structured format for check-in meetings and updates. Such feature is absent in EasyRetro which can be disadvantageous for teams that want regular structured meetings.
Limited Templates - Parabol comes with an array of beneficial templates that help to structure retrospectives and other meetings, which are absent in EasyRetro. These templates can be especially useful for teams new to retrospectives or looking for new approaches.

Pick #6


SessionLab is an interactive workshop and meeting management tool designed to facilitate more productive and efficient sessions. Much like, it offers an alternative approach to driving meeting engagement and collaboration. However, SessionLab specializes in providing educators, facilitators, and trainers with structured templates and an intuitive drag-and-drop interface to design workshops and sessions. It’s equipped with features like collaborative real-time editing, a vast library of exercises and methods, and easy-to-share session plans and PDF exports. While both tools aim to increase productivity and collaboration, SessionLab’s focus is more on planning and designing workshop sessions, whereas is oriented towards retrospective meetings for agile teams.

User-friendly Interface: The interface of SessionLab is very intuitive and user-friendly, providing a no-hassle experience for first-time users. This results in faster and more efficient work, without needing to spend much time understanding the interface, unlike Parabol.
Excellent Content Library: SessionLab has an extensive library of pre-designed methods and exercises. If you are unsure how to proceed with a particular activity or meeting, there is a high chance you'll find a pre-existing method in SessionLab's library which you can use or use as inspiration.
Real-time collaboration: SessionLab supports real-time collaboration, which means multiple users can work simultaneously on the same project. This is not just limited to planning, but also allows for real-time updates during the execution phase. While Parabol supports collaboration it does not offer this real-time flexibility.
Variety in Session Formats: SessionLab supports more formats for workshops or meetings than Parabol, providing more flexibility to its users. This includes time-based planning to detailed agenda setting, allowing users to structure sessions exactly how they want.
Strong Integration: SessionLab allows for strong integration with other software like Slack, which can be a pivotal need for certain organizations. This feature increases its compatibility with existing work environments. While Parabol does offer some integrations, SessionLab leads in terms of seamless app connectivity and integration.
SessionLab does not support built-in retrospective templates like Parabol. Users of Parabol have the convenience of using predefined templates that can be customized to suit unique needs.
SessionLab lacks seamless integration with project management tools like Jira and GitHub, unlike Parabol which offers these functionalities, supporting smoother teamwork and project management.
The real-time collaboration features are not as robust as Parabol. Parabol allows editing by multiple users at the same time, and changes are visible as they happen, which SessionLab doesn't offer.
Parabol offers a voting system to prioritize discussion topics, which can be vital in brainstorming sessions for driving the team's focus on key issues. This feature is absent in SessionLab.
Parabol has a distinct feature of providing timeline views of past meetings and actions, which can be convenient for revisiting past discussions or decisions. On the other hand, SessionLab, used as a Parabol alternative, lacks this feature.

Pick #7

Slido is an audience interaction tool used to increase engagement during meetings, conferences, and other events. As an alternative to, it focuses on fostering an interactive experience through live Q&A sessions, polls, and quizzes, rather than Parabol’s emphasis on agile meeting processes, task distribution, and retrospective analysis. Slido aims to democratize the meeting space by allowing all participants to ask questions and share feedback more seamlessly, whereas Parabol is more directed towards project management and organized team collaboration. Both facilitate improved communication, but they each offer different approaches and tools to achieve this aim.

Superior Audience Interaction: allows for real-time polling, Q&A, and discussions, which can boost audience participation and interaction. This can be an edge when compared to, particularly if your focus is more towards engaging an audience rather than just team collaboration.
Enhanced Event Management: shines as an event engagement tool, providing unique features like event analytics, live polls, quiz competitions etc. These can make virtual events more interactive and informational which might be lacking in
Seamless Integration: offers easy integration with often-used platforms and tools like PowerPoint, Google Slides and Microsoft Teams. This allows users to use Slido within these platforms while presenting, which may not be possible with
Simplicity: Though has its strong elements, stands out with its simplicity and ease-of-use. It provides a cleaner, easier-to-navigate interface which could be more user-friendly for those less familiar with technology.
Variety of Use-Cases: Slido provides a larger variety of solutions including webinars, meetings, classrooms, and conferences. This makes Slido a more versatile tool when compared to Parabol, which focuses primarily on agile project planning and retrospectives.
Slido is primarily designed for audience interaction during events, it lacks the advanced project management features found in Parabol, such as retrospectives or check-ins which can help keep teams on track and ensure a structured agile workflow.
Less integration capabilities. Parabol integrates with a range of popular tools such as Jira, GitHub, Mattermost, and Slack. While Slido does offer some integrations, it does not match the range offered by Parabol which can create interruptions to work flows.
Limited task oversight. Slido does not facilitate the creation and tracking of tasks and assignments for team members like Parabol does, making it less of a comprehensive team collaboration tool.
Lack of customizability. Parabol offers customizable templates for conducting meetings and retrospectives. Slido, however, lacks the ability to tailor the platform to specific team needs.
Slido is more focused on real-time engagement rather than asynchronous work, which can make it difficult for global teams spread across different time zones to collaborate effectively as they could in Parabol with its asynchronous work feature.

Pick #8

aha slides

AhaSlides is a web-based interactive presentation software that serves as a great alternative to Parabol’s Meeting Engagement Software. It allows presenters to engage with their audiences through real-time polls, surveys, quizzes, and Q&A sessions, enhancing the experience by making meetings, events, and conferences more interactive and productive. The platform supports a range of content types including texts, images, videos, and even HTML. Compared to Parabol, AhaSlides focuses more on engaging audience responses and interactive presentation aspects rather than on agile meeting processes, making it a suitable choice for educators, speakers, and business presenters aiming to boost their audience engagement.

User Friendly Interface: AhaSlides offers a more comfortable interface for creating and managing presentations, leading to increased productivity and ease of use when compared to Parabol.
Interactive Polls and Quizzes: With AhaSlides, you can create real-time interactive polls and quizzes that can engage your audience more effectively. This feature may not be as strong or significant on Parabol.
Multi-Format Support: AhaSlides supports various presentation formats such as images, videos, charts, which can make your presentations more dynamic and attractive, an area that is less prioritized in Parabol.
Audience Feedback: AhaSlides allows audience participation through live reactions, comments, and votes. This connectivity level could improve the dialogue between presenters and participants compared to Parabol.
Downloadable Contents: AhaSlides provides an option to download the presentations, data of the quizzes/polls, and participant responses as well. This function might not be equally prevalent or accessible on Parabol.
Limited integration capabilities: Parabol excels with its ecosystem integration, tying in various tools and services like JIRA, GitHub, and Slack. AhaSlides, on the other hand, is primarily an interactive presentation tool with less emphasis on integration. Tailoring it to meet the same level of connectedness may be challenging.
Leaner Task Management: Parabol is excellent for managing tasks, especially in Agile or Scrum situations, with an interactive dashboard and view, while AhaSlides is mainly made for presentations and may not contain as many robust task management features.
Less Sprint and Agile Retreat Focused: AhaSlides may not provide the same functionality for Agile Retreats and Sprints as Parabol, which is built to assist with these operations. This could make it less effective for software development and project teams.
Absence of Retrospectives: Parabol is built with retrospective meetings in mind. AhaSlides does not have this feature as a built-in option which makes transitioning a challenge for teams accustomed to conducting retrospectives.
Lack of Multi-Meeting Support: Parabol allows for the creation and management of multiple concurrent meetings, while AhaSlides is focused more on individual presentations. This could limit simultaneous collaboration essential in larger projects.


Parabol-co shines in scenarios where teams are focused on agile project management and seeking to foster stronger collaboration through sprint planning, retrospectives, and check-ins. Its user-friendly interface and integration with multiple communication platforms make it an ideal choice for distributed or remote teams aiming to streamline their workflows and enhance productivity. If your organization values actionable insights from sprint retrospectives and aims to continuously improve its processes through collaborative efforts, then Parabol-co is a fitting solution.

On the other hand, organizations that require more comprehensive project management capabilities, including detailed budget tracking, resource allocation, and advanced reporting, might find an alternative software product more aligned with their needs. Furthermore, industries governed by stringent compliance standards or those needing highly customizable and scalable solutions to fit their unique project complexities, may benefit from exploring other options. In cases where the intricacy of projects demands extensive features beyond agile methodology facilitation, turning to an alternative software product could offer the necessary tools for success.

Top 10: Best Alternative