Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Microsoft Teams Alternatives

Exploring the top ten alternative communication platforms to Microsoft Teams that offer unique features, including messaging, video conferencing, and file-sharing functionalities.

Learn more about our top picks for: Microsoft Alternative

There could be several reasons why someone might seek an alternative to Microsoft Teams group chat software. While Microsoft Teams is a widely used platform that integrates with Microsoft Office 365, some users might find it lacking in certain features or find it less user-friendly compared to other video conferencing software in the market. For instance, some users might prefer a simple setup and interface which platforms like Zoom or Google Meet offer, wherein joining meetings directly through a web browser is much simpler. Additionally, companies not using the Microsoft suite of products might look for alternatives that offer better integration with the tools they use. The cost and licensing of Microsoft Teams may also be a concern for some, particularly smaller organizations. Hence, depending on individual or business-specific needs, users might look out for alternatives to Microsoft Teams.

Why would you look for Microsoft Alternative alternative?

Many individuals and businesses may seek alternatives to Microsoft software for various reasons, one being the desire for flexibility that aligns more with their specific needs or workflows. Microsoft’s solutions, while comprehensive, may not always offer the granular customization or unique feature sets that a particular user or industry requires. In a rapidly evolving technological landscape, finding a software solution that can pivot and adapt to unique demands or integrate seamlessly with a diverse ecosystem of other applications becomes paramount.

Additionally, cost considerations play a significant role in the search for Microsoft alternatives. Whether due to budget constraints or the pursuit of a better cost-benefit ratio, users might explore other options that offer similar functionalities at a reduced price or with a pricing model that better fits their financial planning. The quest for software that offers a balance between affordability and robust features without compromising on reliability or user support is a common journey for many seeking alternatives to established giants like Microsoft.

The Best Products

Microsoft Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, a cloud-based application for meeting notes, takes teamwork to another level by innovating how we create, organize, and share meeting notes. Its simultaneous note-taking feature, collaborative editing capacity, and compatibility with widely used calendars and productivity tools make it an absolute essential for teams, irrespective of their size.

One key highlight of ZipDo is the real-time note-taking capability, which fosters a coherent and unified understanding of discussions during meetings – say goodbye to the old-school manual note distribution. Once the meeting wraps up, team members can conveniently modify and add more details to the notes, promptly aligning with the most recent updates.

In the realm of manageability, ZipDo outshines by offering user-friendly categorization into various channels or folders. The software’s ability to search within notes boosts productivity, providing swift access to certain information, eliminating the pain of extensive scrolling or manual searching.

ZipDo’s customized access control mechanism in note sharing guarantees secure information delivery amongst colleagues, customers, or collaborators. Its seamless incorporation with calendars permits automatic generation of collaborative notes for each meeting, bidding farewell to time-consuming manual entries.

In conclusion, ZipDo is an intuitive software providing an all-inclusive range of features destined to boost team productivity, collaboration, and ultimately, project management. Its simultaneous note-taking, cooperative editing, advanced organization, searchability, secure sharing, and hassle-free integration qualities contribute to making it a non-negotiable tool, reshaping meeting management for more efficient project completion.

Pick #2


Zoom is a highly popular video conferencing platform that serves as a strong alternative to Microsoft Teams. It includes a range of robust features such as video and audio conferencing, real-time messaging, and file sharing. With user-friendly interfaces and a strong focus on accessibility, it is suitable for both small businesses and large corporations. It enables seamless collaboration and communication among teams, irrespective of their geographic locations. While Microsoft Teams is deeply integrated with Office 365 and provides unique collaboration features for Office users, Zoom stands out with its simplicity, ease of use, and the ability to host up to 100 participants in the free version, which attracts a wide range of individual users and small businesses.

Superior Video Quality - Zoom's video quality tends to be more reliable and visually impressive than Microsoft Teams, presenting less lag and providing a streamlined teleconferencing experience.
Ease of Use - Zoom offers an intuitive interface, making it easy for individuals of all technological capabilities to use. Its user-friendly design requires less technical knowledge than Microsoft Teams.
Breakout Rooms - Zoom provides the functionality of breakout rooms which is perfect for dividing large group meetings into smaller groups for focused discussions or brainstorming sessions. Microsoft Teams does not provide this particular feature directly.
Webinar Capabilities -Zoom offers built-in webinar functionality which is great for large scale meetings or events with people outside of the organization. This feature is more comprehensive than the live event feature in Microsoft Teams.
Greater Compatibility - Zoom offers wider compatibility with several devices and platforms compared to Microsoft Teams. This makes it easier for individuals to join meetings irrespective of their device or operating system.
Limited Integration with Microsoft Products - Unlike Microsoft Teams, Zoom does not offer seamless integration with other Microsoft products. This means users cannot easily share and collaborate in real-time on documents from Word, Excel, PowerPoint or use applications like SharePoint or Microsoft Planner.
No Offline Usage - Zoom does not have an offline mode, so if internet connectivity is lost or unstable, the user's ability to participate in meetings and discussions is lost as well. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, has an Offline mode where users can still view downloaded files and messages.
Lesser storage - Zoom’s free version provides limited cloud storage for recorded meetings and even the premium versions have storage limits. In comparison, Microsoft Teams provides large file storage options and manages file storage through SharePoint, providing more robust storage options.
No Built-In Planner - Microsoft Teams includes a built-in task planner, while Zoom does not. This integrated feature in Teams allows teams to plan together, assign tasks, and track progress without having to switch between different applications or services.
Limited Channels and Communication Structure - Compared to Microsoft Teams, Zoom lacks extensive functionality in terms of team and channel structures. Teams allows the creation of multiple channels within a team providing a layered communication structure, while Zoom primarily focusses on group meetings and webinars.

Pick #3

GoTo Meeting

GoToMeeting is a powerful video conferencing tool that serves as an alternative to Microsoft Teams. It is designed for businesses of all sizes, offering high definition video and audio capabilities that facilitate virtual meetings and online collaboration. Unlike Teams, which is part of Microsoft’s suite of productivity tools, GoToMeeting is a standalone solution, which might appeal to companies not heavily immersed in the Microsoft ecosystem. It provides features such as screen sharing, meeting recording, drawing tools, and calendar integration. Its straightforward interface makes it a user-friendly choice for companies seeking a reliable and efficient remote communication tool.

Enhanced Web Conferencing: GoToMeeting has a robust web conferencing feature that supports large meetings and webinars, making it exceptionally good for businesses that have frequent large online meetings. With high-definition video and clear audio, it offers an excellent conferencing experience.
Mobile-Friendly: GoToMeeting offers a well-built and user-friendly mobile app, allowing users to join meetings from anywhere via their smartphones. While Microsoft Teams also offers this, users often find GoToMeeting's app to be more intuitive and less resource-consuming.
Commendable Customer Support: GoToMeeting has a reputation for its excellent customer service. The support team promptly aids users with any difficulty they might experience during the setup or usage of the software, often offering quicker and more personalized responses compared to other software like Microsoft Teams.
Integration with Calendar Apps: GoToMeeting integrates seamlessly with popular calendar apps, including Google Calendar and Outlook. This is beneficial for companies that may use a variety of different scheduling tools, allowing them to schedule meetings directly from their calendar application.
VoIP and Phone Dial-in option: GoToMeeting provides more options for audio during a meeting. Along with the VoIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol), it also provides dedicated local dial-in numbers for several countries. This feature is handy for those with low internet connectivity, as they can join the meeting via phone call.
Lack of Integration: GoToMeeting lacks the robust integration with other Microsoft products that Microsoft Teams provides. In a business environment that heavily relies on seamless integration with Microsoft Office Suite applications like Word, PowerPoint, Excel, SharePoint, and more, this could become a significant drawback.
Limited Functionality: While GoToMeeting is perfect for web conferencing and virtual meetings, as an alternative to Microsoft Teams, it lacks some of the advanced features such as team chat, file sharing, task management, and team collaboration tools.
User Interface: GoToMeeting has a different user interface compared with Microsoft Teams. It is relatively simple which may limit more advanced users in their ability to customize and control their online meeting experience.
No Persistent Chat: Unlike Microsoft Teams, GoToMeeting does not offer persistent chat. This means if an organization relies heavily on continuous team collaboration, they may find this feature missing a setback.
Occasional Technical Glitches: Some users have reported experiencing technical issues with GoToMeeting, such as issues with video and audio quality, connection stability, and software compatibility, which could interrupt the workflow and productivity.

Pick #4


Webex by Cisco is a renowned video conferencing platform that presents users with the ability to conduct virtual meetings, share content, and collaborate in real time. As an alternative to Microsoft Teams by Microsoft, Webex offers comparable features, such as screen sharing, integrated chat, and a cloud-based platform with mobile capabilities. However, it particularly stands out with its enhanced video quality, customizable layouts, and superior capabilities in hosting large-scale webinars and training sessions. Furthermore, Webex integrates seamlessly with popular productivity tools like Google Suite and Microsoft 365, thereby making it a robust and flexible solution for businesses of all sizes seeking efficient virtual collaborations.

Advanced Video Conferencing - Webex by Cisco offers superior video quality with support for up to 4K video resolution and adjustable layouts, offering an edge for professional presentations and meetings compared to Microsoft Teams.
Webex Assistant - This is an AI-powered voice assistant specifically designed for meetings. It can take notes, launch meetings, and answer questions about the meeting without any user input required. This feature makes it a valuable tool for multitasking and managing tasks efficiently.
Webex Training Module - Webex has a specific training module to conduct online training sessions with features like testing and automated grading. This provides a level of training convenience that can be advantageous in an educational or rigorous professional setting versus Microsoft Teams' features.
High-End Webinar Services - Cisco Webex Events is a powerful tool for hosting webinars with comprehensive tools for managing and engaging with large-scale audiences, which Microsoft Teams may not be optimised for.
Strong Integration with Cisco Products - For businesses already using Cisco products (like VoIP services, Cisco Unified Communications Manager, and so on), using Webex would mean tighter integration and smoother interoperability. This is especially beneficial for complex corporate tech infrastructures.
Interface Complexity - Webex by Cisco has an interface that is considered by many users to be more complex and less user-friendly than that of Microsoft Teams. This can lead to a longer learning curve and decreased productivity, especially for users who are not tech-savvy.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem - Since Webex is not a Microsoft product, it does not integrate as seamlessly with the Microsoft ecosystem. This becomes a bit of a challenge for organizations heavily reliant on Microsoft Office tools (Word, Excel, etc.). Microsoft Teams offers deep integration with their entire suite of office applications.
User Management - Compared to Microsoft Teams, managing users and their permissions can be more difficult in Webex. This is especially crucial as user roles and access rights need to be managed effectively in an organization, which Teams handles more efficiently.
Collaboration Features - Microsoft Teams outpaces Webex with its extensive collaboration features. These features include advanced file sharing, editing documents in real-time, and well-structured project collaboration tools, which are limited or less intuitive in Webex.
Limited Customization - Webex offers fewer customization options compared to Microsoft Teams. This lack of customization means organizations may not be able to tailor Webex to suit their specific needs in the same way they can with Microsoft Teams.

Pick #5

Google Meet

Google Meet is a robust video conferencing software developed by Google as part of its Google Workspace suite of productivity tools. It emerges as a competitive alternative to Microsoft Teams for individuals and businesses seeking a streamlined, user-friendly interface for virtual meetings and collaborations. Google Meet supports high-definition video meetings with up to 250 participants along with advanced features such as screen sharing, live captions, and integrations with other Google Workspace apps like Gmail and Calendar. It provides enterprise-grade security and can be accessed directly from a web browser, eliminating the need for app installations, thus offering an easily accessible platform for online communication and collaboration.

Seamless Integration with Google Workspace: Google Meet is deeply integrated with Google Workspace which includes Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, and more. This allows for easy scheduling, invitation, joining meetings directly from these apps, and accessing related files if needed.
Live Captioning: Google Meet offers an automatic live captioning feature powered by Google's speech recognition technology. Live captions can make meetings more accessible for participants who are deaf or hard-of-hearing, or have different language proficiency levels.
Familiar Interface: For those already using Google services, the interface of Google Meet is quite familiar and user-friendly. This can reduce the learning curve for new users as they transition from personal Google services to Google Meet for professional use.
Adjustable Layouts and Screen Settings: Google Meet provides flexible screen and layout options, enabling users to customise their view and presentation. This includes a tiled layout for larger group meetings, an option to pin or spotlight for presentations, and adjust video quality to conserve bandwidth.
Hand-Raising Feature: Google Meet's hand-raising feature is beneficial in large meetings where it's important to manage who speaks when. This tool allows people to signal that they'd like to speak without interrupting the flow of the conversation.
Google Meet cannot integrate as closely with the Microsoft ecosystem as Microsoft Teams can. This could potentially slow down productivity if your work is primarily based in Microsoft Office 365 tools.
Each Google Meet call is limited to 60 minutes for free users while Microsoft Teams allows meetings for up to 24 hours, even for free users.
Google Meet does not allow users to create private channels within a team to segregate different discussions or topics as Microsoft Teams does.
Google Meet does not fully support other browsers aside from Google Chrome, it might not be as effective for those who primarily use browsers such as Edge or Firefox.
Google Meet lacks advanced features such as the ability to record meetings and breakout rooms in its free version, whereas Microsoft Teams includes these features even in its free version.

Pick #6

Zoho Meeting

Zoho Meeting is a robust online video conferencing solution that offers a solid alternative to Microsoft Teams. It allows users to host and conduct virtual meetings, webinars, and online presentations in a secure and user-friendly environment. As opposed to Microsoft Teams, which integrates with broader Office 365 suite functionalities, Zoho Meeting excels in its lightweight design and seamless integration with Zoho’s suite of products, making it an ideal choice for businesses already leveraging Zoho’s ecosystem. It is praised for its straightforward usability, audio-video clarity, screen-sharing capabilities, and cost-effective pricing, creating an efficient platform for collaborative, remote communication.

Integrations with Services: Zoho Meeting integrates seamlessly with other Zoho products such as Zoho CRM, Zoho Projects and Zoho Calendar. This is ideal for businesses already using Zoho's suite of tools to manage their operations, as it allows for a smoother workflow and improved collaboration.
Webinar Functionality: As a Microsoft Teams alternative, Zoho Meeting comes with the option of hosting webinars, an advantage for businesses which need to host large-scale presentations or training sessions online. It allows for registration management, analytics, and custom follow-ups with attendees.
Interface Usability: Zoho Meeting's user interface is simple and easy to use, reducing the learning curve for teams transitioning from other group chat apps. The straightforward design ensures that users, even without technical knowledge, can navigate and make the most of its features.
In-Built Recording Option: Zoho Meeting has an in-built feature that allows for the recording of meetings and webinars. This can be beneficial for businesses that need to review meetings, train new employees, or provide clips for promotional use.
Shifting Presenter Control: Within a meeting, Zoho Meeting allows you to easily shift the control of the presenter. This makes it easy for different team members to share their screens and manage the presentation, leading to more collaborative and interactive meetings.
Zoho Meeting doesn't integrate as seamlessly with the Microsoft ecosystem as Microsoft Teams would. It may cause inconvenience for users who are heavily invested in Microsoft's suite of productivity tools.
Zoho Meeting, compared to Microsoft Teams, offers fewer customization options. Teams' users can customize their workspace more extensively, which may provide a more effective and personalized user experience.
Zoho Meeting lacks some advanced features such as application sharing, co-authoring of files and documents in real-time, which are available in Microsoft Teams. It may affect the efficiency of collaboration among team members.
Zoho meeting lacks robust channel creation functionality which is available in Microsoft Teams. In Teams, each project or department can have its own private or public channel which makes team communication efficient and organized.
Microsoft Teams supports a larger number of participants in a single meeting compared to Zoho Meeting. This could be problematic for larger organizations or businesses requiring large-scale virtual meetings or conferences.

Pick #7

BlueJeans Meetings

BlueJeans is a leading video conferencing solution that serves as an effective alternative to Microsoft Teams. It is a cloud-based platform that provides high-quality, secure and interactive video communications. BlueJeans offers a variety of features such as screen sharing, recording, live streaming and chat functionalities. It is designed for businesses of all sizes, making it easy to host multi-participant meetings or webinars. Its seamless integration with various applications such as Microsoft Outlook, Google Calendar, and Slack allows users to schedule and join meetings instantly. Thus, BlueJeans provides a robust and intuitive solution for organizations seeking efficient and collaborative video conferencing software.

Superior Video Quality - BlueJeans provides excellent video quality, even in low bandwidth situations, resulting in smoother and more professional video conferencing experiences.
Dolby Voice Integration - BlueJeans comes with Dolby Voice, providing clearer, more natural sound. It reduces background noise and enhances voice clarity, which makes conversations more immersive and productive.
Interoperability - BlueJeans supports a wide range of devices and platforms. It is also interoperable with other communication tools such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom through its integrations, offering flexibility for businesses with diverse software ecosystems.
Professional Event Tools - BlueJeans Events offer options for hosting webinars, town halls and large meetings. Features included are event registration, Q&A, polling, and recording, offering more advantages for large-scale meetings or events.
Enhanced Meeting Analytics - BlueJeans provides advanced analytics tools including network quality stats and user engagement metrics. This helps businesses to monitor the quality of their meetings and understand participation and engagement levels.
Limited integrations: BlueJeans does not integrate as seamlessly with Office 365 applications as Microsoft Teams does. This can impact productivity and workflow, particularly for organizations heavily utilizing Office 365.
Familiarity and interface: BlueJeans has a distinctly different user interface compared to Microsoft Teams, users migrating from Teams to BlueJeans might find it challenging.
Feature limitations: BlueJeans lacks some advanced features compared to Microsoft Teams. For example, Teams has a more robust system for file sharing and management within the platform.
Communication limitations: Unlike Microsoft Teams, BlueJeans lacks many of the chat-based workspace capabilities and does not carry the threaded conversations feature that Teams does.
Mobile compatibility: The BlueJeans app for mobile devices is not as versatile, sometimes it performs slower and comes with fewer features compared to Microsoft Teams' mobile app.

Pick #8


Loom is a video messaging tool that serves as an alternative to traditional video conferencing software like Microsoft Teams. Instead of real-time communication, Loom allows users to record and share screen and camera videos, enabling asynchronous communication. This ensures that the receiver can view the videos at their convenience. Loom is widely embraced in professional settings for product demos, presentations, feedbacks, and educational content. The salient features of this platform also include analytics to track viewer data and engagement, custom branding abilities, and drawing tools. While Loom doesn’t facilitate direct live-meetings like Microsoft Teams, its distinctive approach to video communication provides a more flexible and time-efficient solution for businesses and individuals.

Easy Video Recording - Loom stands out with its easy-to-use video recording features. More than just a chat platform, Loom allows you to quickly record your screen, webcam, or both to share information and explain concepts visually.
Asynchronous Communication - Unlike Microsoft Teams, which is more focused on real-time communication, Loom caters to asynchronous communication. For distributed teams or those in different time zones, this can make teamwork more efficient and less interruption-driven.
Video Library - With Loom, all recorded videos can be stored and shared in a personal video library. This allows for easy access and reference to previous communications, creating an archive of resources.
Lifetime Access - Unlike messages in Microsoft Teams which may get lost in long chat histories, videos created on Loom can be accessed anytime. This way, critical communication stays available and accessible whenever needed.
Interactive Comments - Loom provides the feature of interactive commenting on videos, a unique feature that makes communications more engaging. It enables viewers to comment at specific time stamps of the video, initiating more context-driven discussions.
Loom largely focuses on video messaging, unlike Microsoft Teams, which is a complete collaboration platform. This means Loom lacks features like document collaboration, comprehensive task management, and integrated chat functionality.
Loom does not support live meetings or calls which are key features in Microsoft Teams. Loom is designed for asynchronous communication whereas Teams is better suited for real-time interactions, a much-needed feature particularly in a corporate environment.
Loom does not incorporate a robust organizational structure like Teams. This means it can be difficult to manage large groups or projects efficiently. Teams on the other hand provides features like teams & channels, allowing users to organize by departments, projects, or however they see fit.
Loom lacks third party app integrations that are available in Teams. Teams offers integration with a vast range of other software such as development tools, project management tools or CRM that allows for more seamless work.
Finally, Loom is not built for extensive file storing and sharing, unlike Teams, which offers a substantial amount of storage space and seamless file sharing through SharePoint and OneDrive integration. This difference could limit data and file management in a team context when using Loom.

Pick #9


Vowel is an innovative video conferencing software alternative to tools like Microsoft Teams. It focuses on enhancing team collaboration and streamlining meeting processes. Vowel provides features like real-time transcription, post-meeting summaries, powerful search capabilities, task assignment, and smart scheduling. These functionalities aim to minimize the common pain points of remote meetings such as information loss, time wasted on technical difficulties, or misunderstandings due to miscommunication. Unlike Microsoft Teams, which integrates with various Microsoft products for a holistic approach, Vowel concentrates mostly on optimizing the meeting part of team collaborations.

Meeting Transcripts: One of the standout features of Vowel is its meeting transcription service. It provides transcription in real-time, which is excellent for tracking the progress of the meeting and reviewing points discussed later.
Integrated Task Management: Vowel provides an integrated platform where tasks can be assigned to team members directly. Microsoft Teams requires third-party apps for this kind of integration. Actions can be set, assigned and tracked within the Vowel interface, reminiscent of project management tools.
Meeting Analytics: Vowel offers analytics after each meeting, providing insights into engagement, participation, and action items. This can help companies improve their meeting structures and increase efficiency.
Searchable Transcripts: With Vowel's AI powered searchable transcripts, it becomes much easier to locate information from previous meetings. Teams can avoid repetitive or duplicate work and easily recall decisions and action items discussed.
Simultaneous Interaction: Within Vowel platform, simultaneous interaction is viable. Multiple participants can engage in the meeting using a 'note' feature to write their viewpoints without interrupting speakers, which may be more efficient and inclusive than conventional 'hand-raising' and waiting to speak.
Limited Integrations - Microsoft Teams integrates well with a broad range of other Microsoft products and services, as well as third-party applications, which Vowel does not offer on the same scale. This lack of integration could lead to inefficiencies in workflow.
No Offline Mode - Unlike Microsoft Teams, Vowel does not have an offline mode. Thus, users would not be able to access their previous conversations or files when they are not connected to the Internet.
Limited File Sharing - Microsoft Teams allows users to share and co-edit files directly within the platform. Vowel, on the other hand, doesn't have this capability to the same extent, which may limit collaboration.
Limited International Support - As a newer product on the market, Vowel might not offer the same level of user support in languages other than English, or in as many time zones as Microsoft's global support network.
Various Platform Instability - Some users have reported instances of instability and bugs with Vowel's platform. Microsoft Teams, being a more mature product, generally offers a more consistent experience.

Pick #10


Yac is a digital communication platform that serves as an alternative to traditional video conferencing software like Microsoft Teams. It mainly focuses on providing voice messaging services to facilitate team communication. Using Yac, one can send succinct voice messages to team members instead of scheduling lengthy meetings, allowing quick, asynchronous exchanges of ideas. Additionally, it includes features like screen sharing, transcription services, comments on recordings, etc., making it a multipurpose tool for team communication. Though it provides limited video messaging capabilities, its main value proposition is its voice messaging feature, offering users more flexibility and time efficiency.

Voice messaging - Yac is primarily a voice messaging tool, which allows you to send quick voice messages to your team. This adds an element of personal connection and can sometimes be more efficient than typing out a message.
Asynchronous communication - With Yac, you can send a message without expecting an immediate response. This can lead to less disruption and more focused work time, compared to more instant-chat based platforms like Microsoft Teams.
Screen sharing and annotations - Yac provides an easy to use screen sharing feature with annotation capabilities. This can be particularly useful for explaining complex matters or discussing a specific design or document.
Transcriptions: Yac also automatically transcribes voice messages. This can be handy for referencing back to a specific section of a conversation, especially when dealing with detailed information or specific instructions.
Location independent communication: Unlike Microsoft Teams, Yac focuses heavily on location independent team communication. It is designed from the ground up for remote, distributed, or asynchronous teams, taking time zones and work schedules into account.
Limited Collaborative Features: Unlike Microsoft Teams, Yac does not offer extensive collaboration options, such as persistent chat, file sharing, collaborative editing, and integration with other productivity tools. This can make group work less organized and efficient.
Lack of Integrations: While Microsoft Teams can integrate with a wide variety of apps and services, Yac does not support such extensive integration, limiting its flexibility in diverse working environments.
Non-Comprehensive Conference Features: Yac’s teleconferencing capabilities are more limited than Teams. It lacks tools such as video meetings with multiple participants, scheduling tools, meeting options, and more, making it a less comprehensive solution for larger and more complex organizations.
No Direct Chat Option: In Yac, team members can send voice messages, images or screenshots, but there is no option for real-time instant messaging. In comparison, Microsoft Teams allows you to chat instantly and directly with team members, making communication more immediate and efficient.
Asynchronous Communication: Yac is built around voice messages which are more suitable for asynchronous communication. In the fast-paced corporate world, synchronous, real-time communication provided by Microsoft Teams could be more beneficial for quick decisions and immediate feedback.

Pick #11


Whereby is a flexible and user-friendly video conferencing software that serves as an alternative to Microsoft Teams. This platform emphasizes ease of use, with no app or software downloads necessary for participants; all meetings are conductible directly through the browser. Whereby provides features including screen sharing, customizable meeting rooms, and integration with numerous apps like Trello, Google Drive, and YouTube. In comparison to Microsoft Teams, which often caters to larger businesses and unfolds various integrations with the Office 365 suite, Whereby is noted for its simplicity and is often chosen by smaller teams or individual users seeking straightforward, browser-based video conferencing solutions.

User-Friendly Interface - Whereby has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface which makes it accessible even to non-tech savvy users. This facilitates effective communication and makes the platform user-friendly in comparison to Microsoft Teams which can be complex for first time users.
No Downloads Needed - Whereby runs directly in the browser, eliminating the need for downloading any software or application. This makes it more convenient for users who have limited storage capacity on their devices or have restrictions in downloading software.
Rooms Concept - In Whereby, the concept of 'Rooms' is used for conducting meetings. A single unique URL for a room can be used repeatedly, thus avoiding the hassle of creating and disseminating a new meeting link every time.
Custom Branding - Whereby offers the option for custom branding in its video meeting spaces. This means you can customize the meeting rooms with company logos or specific themes, providing a more personalized experience in comparison to Microsoft Teams.
Lock Rooms Feature - Whereby allows you to lock rooms after the meeting has started, therefore controlling who joins the meeting. While Microsoft Teams also has access control, Whereby’s feature is much simpler to use and offers more immediate control.
Limited Participants: Compared to Microsoft Teams which can host up to 10,000 participants, Whereby's basic plan only allows for 50 participants.
Lack of Advanced Features: Microsoft Teams comes with various features such as screen-sharing, recording meetings, sophisticated video conferencing and meeting options. However, Whereby's feature set is quite limited in comparison and does not include some of these advanced features.
No Integration with Office 365: If your organization heavily utilizes Microsoft's software suite, you might face some difficulties with Whereby as it does not offer smooth integration with Office 365 like Microsoft Teams.
File Sharing Limitations: In Microsoft Teams, users have the ability to easily share files and collaborate in real-time. On the flip side, Whereby lacks such comprehensive file-sharing capabilities.
Lack of Advanced Administration Controls: Microsoft Teams has comprehensive administration controls including managing users, teams, and setting various policies for communication. In contrast, Whereby doesn’t provide such in-depth admin controls.


Microsoft software often shines in environments that prioritize seamless integration, collaboration, and a broad support ecosystem. Its widespread adoption across industries ensures that users can rely on a vast community for troubleshooting and maximized compatibility with various file formats and systems. Ideal for businesses that leverage legacy systems alongside modern infrastructure, Microsoft’s software suite offers a unified platform that enhances productivity and communication. This makes it particularly suitable for organizations requiring dependable compatibility and extensive support for a diverse and dynamic technological environment.

On the other hand, alternative software products might be the go-to choice for users valuing high customization, niche functionalities, or adherence to strict privacy and open-source principles. These alternatives often appeal to those seeking cost-effective solutions without the need for extensive interoperability with Microsoft’s ecosystem. Perfect for startups, individuals, or entities looking to break free from traditional software constraints, these alternatives offer flexibility and innovation tailored to specific needs and ideologies. They provide a compelling option for those willing to explore beyond mainstream offerings to find tools that uniquely align with their operational ethos and budgetary considerations.

Top 10: Best Microsoft Alternative