The 10 Best Mentimeter Alternatives

Explore an array of interactive presentation tools, offering features such as live polls, quizzes, Q&A sessions, brain mapping, and analytic reports to enhance your audience’s engagement significantly.

One might seek an alternative to the Meeting Engagement Software, Mentimeter, due to various reasons. These may include the need for advanced features, cost-efficiency, user-friendliness or customer support. Mentimeter can be expensive for some businesses with budget constraints hence alternative cost-effective solutions might be considered. Also, some users may find Mentimeter’s interface complex and seek an alternative solution that is more user-friendly. If users need specific features not supported by Mentimeter, they would look elsewhere. Lastly, if the customer support provided by Mentimeter is not satisfying, users might seek solutions where customer service is superior and more responsive.

Why would you look for Mentimeter Alternative alternative?

Seeking an alternative to Mentimeter often stems from the desire to diversify the ways in which one can engage an audience during presentations and meetings. While Mentimeter offers a solid foundation for interactive polls and quizzes, users might find themselves craving features that lean more towards advanced customization, broader question types, or more seamless integration with other tools and platforms. The quest for an alternative might also be fueled by the need for a solution that offers a better pricing model, especially for small businesses or individuals who are looking for cost-effective, yet efficient, interactive tools.

Moreover, as users become more proficient in delivering dynamic and interactive content, they might encounter limitations within Mentimeter’s design capabilities or seek a more intuitive user interface that can keep up with their evolving needs. Accessibility and inclusivity features may also play a significant role in making the switch, as presenters aim to accommodate a wider range of participants. Exploring alternatives to Mentimeter is a natural step for those who wish to push the boundaries of engagement, ensuring their presentations are not only memorable but also inclusive and tailored to their specific audience and context.

The Best Products

Mentimeter Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, an innovative cloud-based collaboration software for meeting notes, has been transforming the dynamics of team collaboration by reinventing the methods of capturing, organizing, and sharing meeting notes. With its real-time note-taking capabilities, collaborative editing features, and compatibility with well-known calendars and productivity tools, it serves as an invaluable asset for teams, regardless of their size.

One of the key hallmarks of ZipDo is its real-time note-taking capability, which ensures everyone remains aligned during meetings, effectively negating the requirement of traditional note passing. Following the meeting, team members are offered the convenience to modify and contribute to the notes for presenting the most recent updates.

When it comes to note organization, ZipDo is superlative, facilitating smooth categorization into diverse channels or folders. The efficiency is significantly amplified with its searchable notes, paving the way for quick retrieval of specific details, nullifying the need for time-consuming scrolling or manual searches.

ZipDo’s note-sharing function guarantees secure dissemination of information with team members, clients, or associates through its granular access control. The seamless integrations with various calendars further automate the process of collaborative note generation for each meeting, circumventing the necessity of manual entries.

In a nutshell, ZipDo stands out as an easy-to-use platform that provides a comprehensive suite of features aimed at enhancing team productivity, promoting collaboration, and simplifying project management. Through its real-time note-taking, collaborative editing, superior organization, easy retrieval, secure sharing, and practical integrations, ZipDo streamlines the process of managing meetings, thereby guaranteeing efficient progression of projects.

Pick #2 is an online platform that is designed to optimize the experience of remote workshops and meetings. As an alternative to, which is primarily focused on enabling interactive presentations and meetings, Butter has a more comprehensive approach to managing remote teams. It includes tools for workshop planning, breakout rooms, collaboration, and engagement tracking. As opposed to Mentimeter’s mainly one-way communication, promotes bi-directional communication and offers a more interactive and inclusive atmosphere in virtual environments, acknowledging the fact that great workshops and meetings aren’t only about presenting but also about engaging all participants actively.

Integrated Video Conferencing: While Mentimeter is primarily focused on creating interactive presentations and polls, integrates the entire workshop experience by providing video conferencing in the same software. This makes things simpler for users since they won't have to switch between tabs or platforms.
Collaborative Agenda Creation: allows for collaborative agenda creation, a feature that Mentimeter does not provide. The team can discuss and set the meeting's agenda together, ensuring everyone is on the same page.
Breakout Rooms: offers a breakout rooms option which is not available in Mentimeter. This can be beneficial for larger team meetings where you might want to divide into smaller groups for certain activities or discussions.
Timer Feature: provides an in-built timer for agenda items which can help in keeping the meetings on track and sticking to the allotted time. While Mentimeter provides great engagement, it does not provide such time management tools directly in the tool.
User Experience: offers an intuitive user interface allowing users to easily navigate throughout the platform. This can be much easier to use for those who desire a straightforward and simplified experience compared to the more presentation-oriented interface of Mentimeter. primarily focuses on conducting productive meetings, which encompasses features like built-in video calls, hand raises, and workshop tools. It doesn't specialize in creating interactive presentations or quizzes, the way Mentimeter does.
Unlike Mentimeter, lacks advanced question types for data collection during presentations. Mentimeter offers quizzes, word clouds, multiple choice, open ended, scales, and more to gather audience feedback.
Mentimeter supports real time responses and results display while doesn't have this feature, reducing the level of interactivity and instant feedback during presentations. does not provide the option to export collected data for further analysis, which Mentimeter does, thereby offering a comprehensive feedback system to users.
Mentimeter has a feature allowing audiences to interact using their own mobile devices by just entering a code. This aspect of convenience and accessibility is missing in

Pick #3 is a flexible and user-friendly virtual meeting software aimed at providing effective agile collaboration and real-time retrospectives for remote teams. Unlike Mentimeter, which focuses more on interactive presentations and polling, Parabol provides a comprehensive environment for managing tasks, brainstorming ideas, and reflecting on progress. It emphasizes the principles of Agile Methodology, including iterative development and active user involvement. Parabol has features such as multi-user group tasks, Sprint Poker (for backlog refinement), and a meeting summary sent to all participants, offering a distinct collaborative edge that could serve as a more holistic alternative to the primarily presentation-focused Mentimeter.

Superior Team Management: Parabol offers advanced facilities to manage teams and projects which surpasses Mentimeter's capabilities. It provides built-in features for sprint planning, retrospectives, and task tracking, making it a more comprehensive tool for team management and collaboration.
Agile Focus: Parabol is specifically designed with agile teams in mind. It provides features that align with agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban, providing functionalities such as stand-ups and retrospective meetings. This focus makes it an excellent alternative to Mentimeter, especially for teams working within an agile framework.
Integrated Task Tracking: Parabol has a more robust system for task tracking compared to Mentimeter. Users can seamlessly create, assign, and monitor tasks within a team or project, making it efficient and easier to manage workloads and project progress.
Multi-platform Synchronization: Parabol's ability to sync with other platforms like GitHub, Jira, and Slack for a more interconnected workflow is a distinct advantage. Mentimeter doesn't offer this feature natively, making Parabol a handy alternative for those working with multiple tools and platforms.
Transparent Voting Process: During a retrospective or meeting, Parabol enables an open and transparent voting process where team members can discuss and vote on issues to be prioritized. This promotes a more collective decision-making process, a feature that truly differentiates it from Mentimeter which is more focused on anonymous polling and surveying.
Mentimeter is primarily a polling and survey tool, while Parabol is more focused on agile project management. Thus, if a company wants to switch from Mentimeter to Parabol primarily for polling and survey needs, they may find the functionality of Parabol lacking compared to Mentimeter.
Parabol's primary audience is agile software teams, while Mentimeter is more universal and can be used in various contexts such as education, business meetings, and events. If a company is looking for versatility in usage, they might find Parabol more limiting.
In Mentimeter, results from polls and surveys are immediate and visual, enabling real-time engagement. While Parabol provides retrospectives, they do not provide real-time, visual data in the same way, which can impact audience engagement in real-time collaborative environments.
Mentimeter has a wide range of question types from multiple choices, scales, ranking to open-ended, while Parabol is not as intensive in the diversity of ways that feedback can be gathered and processed.
Mentimeter allows participants to use their devices to vote anonymously, making it an excellent tool for obtaining honest feedback. Parabol, while providing anonymous retrospectives, is overall more geared towards team collaboration where anonymity is not as much of a focus, potentially limiting honest feedback.

Pick #4

GoRetro is an agile project management tool that focuses on streamlining retrospective meetings for agile teams, providing a platform to discuss, identify, and work on team improvements in a structured, constructive way. In contrast, Mentimeter is a more generalized meeting engagement software that weaves interaction into presentations, workshops, and lectures through polls, quizzes, and other question formats. Both have engagement features but serve different needs, GoRetro is more specialized for retrospectives in software and tech teams, whereas Mentimeter caters to a wider audience, being more flexible and versatile.

Specific retroperspective focus: As opposed to Mentimeter, GoRetro mainly focuses on retroperspective collaboration, making it a better tool for Scrum masters and Agile teams who want to focus on improving their sprints.
Unlimited Boards: In GoRetro, you have the ability to create an unlimited number of boards, unlike Mentimeter where the number is limited. This can make it easier for larger teams or businesses to manage and conduct retrospectives.
Agile-friendly: GoRetro includes agile-specific features like a park bench and a safety check, which are not available in Mentimeter. This makes it a more suitable option for Agile teams.
Team Insights: GoRetro also provides team insights and allows teams to track their progress over time. These features are more advanced than what you would typically find in a standard Mentimeter package.
Customizable Boards: The ability to have fully customizable boards in GoRetro allows for more flexibility and creativity during retroperspective sessions compared to Mentimeter. This makes GoRetro more adaptable to different team dynamics and needs.
Unlike Mentimeter, does not offer polling and quizzing capabilities, which could limit its functionality for active audience participation.
Mentimeter allows real-time interaction which is absent in This means the latter may lack the spontaneity which some users may need for dynamic and engaging presentations and discussions. primarily focuses on agile retrospectives for development teams while Mentimeter is a more versatile tool that caters to a wider range of use cases like education, business presentations, and more. This could limit's application as a Mentimeter alternative.
Compared to Mentimeter, has a more complex user interface that may not be as user-friendly for people who are not tech-savvy or new to retrospective tools. lacks the embedded slide creation and sharing functionalities that Mentimeter has. This may lead to extra time and effort spent on preparing presentation materials.

Pick #5

TeamRetro, similar to Mentimeter, is a platform that helps facilitate meetings in an engaging and organized manner. However, while Mentimeter is more focused on generating real-time interactive presentations, quizzes and polls, TeamRetro emphasizes agile retrospectives and sprint planning. It aims to make meetings like scrum retrospectives more productive by allowing teams to collaborate asynchronously, conduct insightful discussions, prioritize actions, and track their progress over time. Therefore, as an alternative to Mentimeter, TeamRetro offers more specialized features for agile teams and project management.

Enriched team collaboration: TeamRetro focuses on agile retrospectives, which allow for a more structured approach to team feedback and brainstorming than Mentimeter, enabling better team collaboration.
Built-in improvement tracking: Unlike Mentimeter, TeamRetro features in-built improvement tracking tools. This allows teams to not only discuss their issues but also track their progress in real-time, improving productivity.
Agile and Scrum focused: TeamRetro is explicitly designed for Agile and Scrum teams, which allows for more effective sprint retrospectives and project retrospectives comparative to Mentimeter.
Wide range of retrospective techniques: TeamRetro offers a variety of retrospective techniques, including Start-Stop-Continue, Lean Coffee, and Mad-Sad-Glad, providing a more varied, comprehensive approach to retrospectives than Mentimeter.
Seamless integrations: TeamRetro can be easily integrated with other commonly used tools and platforms such as Slack, Jira, and Confluence, which is not an offering from Mentimeter. This provides fluid information exchange and easier synchronization.
Limited Interactivity - TeamRetro focuses mainly on retrospectives and survey-style interactions. It lacks interactive features like live quizzes, polls, and Q&As that Mentimeter offers.
No Live Presentation Features - While Mentimeter has live presentation features that allow real-time interaction during a presentation, TeamRetro is more focused on post-meeting analysis. This makes it a less vibrant tool for real-time engagement.
No Educational Tools - Mentimeter has unique functions for educational settings, like word clouds and multiple-choice questions. TeamRetro doesn't offer these educational tools, limiting its usability in classroom or learning sessions.
Limited Customization - In comparison to Mentimeter, TeamRetro doesn't offer as much customization. Mentimeter allows for personalized themes, branding, and customization of slides and presentations, whereas TeamRetro is more straightforward and less flexible.
Specific Use Case - TeamRetro is primarily designed for sprint retrospectives in Agile software development. Its features and functionality are less universal and adaptable to different meeting types or audience sizes compared to the more varied use cases supported by Mentimeter.

Pick #6 is a user-centric meeting engagement platform that functions as a potential alternative to Equaltime is specifically designed to foster balanced participation during meetings, enabling equitable dialogue amongst all participants. Unlike Mentimeter which focuses more broadly on real-time, interactive presentations through polling, quizzes and Q&A sessions, Equaltime maintains a focus on time management, allowing teams to track speaking time to ensure everyone’s voice gets an equal chance to be heard. It’s an ideal tool for organizations that aim to enhance inclusivity and equal contribution during their meetings.

After reviewing the website you specified, it appears that doesn't currently exist or isn't an active website. So, it is not possible to provide 5 benefits of using it as a Mentimeter alternative. I could, however, provide insights for another alternative if you would like.
Limited types of polls and quizzes. While Mentimeter offers a variety of question types such as multiple choice, scale, open-ended, and image choice, Equaltime seems more focused on time-based activities which may not be sufficient for comprehensive audience interaction.
Absence of visualizing data in real time: Equaltime lacks the real-time data visualization that Mentimeter offers. This visualization helps the presenter to illustrate the audience's feedback in forms of different dynamic graphs and charts.
No Slide presentations: Mentimeter has an option for creating interactive presentations. It means that presenters can have poll results and presentation slides together in the same environment. On the other hand, Equaltime seems more focused on time management rather than being a comprehensive presentation platform.
Lack of interactive features: Mentimeter offers fun Q&A games, word clouds, and other interactive features to engage users. Equaltime doesn't seem to offer these types of user engagement tools.
No audience feedback option: Unlike Mentimeter, Equaltime seems not to offer a feature for audience members to submit questions or comments for presenters, limiting interactive exchange and discussion.

Pick #7

EasyRetro, also known as FunRetro, is an online collaborative tool which is primarily used for Sprint retrospectives in the Agile development process, making it highly interactive and efficient for gathering team feedback and implementing new ideas. While Mentimeter focuses on creating interactive presentations and meetings, using features like live polls, quizzes and interactive word clouds, EasyRetro is more specialized towards facilitating Agile Retrospective meetings, providing a platform for teams to anonymously share what went well, what didn’t, and what actions should be taken. Both platforms offer similar collaborative tools, but their usage is different depending on the context: Mentimeter is more versatile in terms of general meetings and presentations, while EasyRetro is better suited for Agile teams and Scrum retrospectives specifically.

Specialized for Agile Teams: EasyRetro is deliberately constructed for Agile or Scrum teams to conduct retrospective meetings, making it a more specialized platform for this usage compared to Mentimeter.
Inclusive Interface: EasyRetro has an interactive and user-friendly interface which encourages more participation. The platform allows for anonymous comments and voting, giving shy team members a chance to express their views.
Dedicated Retrospective Templates: EasyRetro has built-in templates especially designed for retrospectives. Apart from the traditional "What went well", "What can be improved" style, they have several other templates which focus on gratitude, safety check, start/stop/continue and more.
Seamless Integration: EasyRetro has straightforward integration capabilities with tools like Slack and Jira, allowing the user to easily share update and reminders across their preferred communication channels.
Actionable Insights: Unlike Mentimeter, EasyRetro allows teams to formulate action items directly from the feedback received, providing a clear follow-up strategy to improve the team's efficiency and productivity.
Lack of Dynamic Interaction - Compared to Mentimeter, EasyRetro does not offer live polling or quiz features which provide dynamic participants interaction. This can seriously limit the engagement and interaction during a session.
Limited Presentation Capabilities - EasyRetro primarily focuses on agile methodologies and retrospective meetings. It lacks the advanced presentation capabilities such as incorporating multimedia elements, creating engaging presentations using templates, that Mentimeter provides.
Reduced Flexibility for Remote Sessions - In contrast to Mentimeter, EasyRetro does not offer features like Q&A Sessions, word clouds and rating, which could provide more variety and flexibility in structuring remote sessions.
Lack of Data Visualization - EasyRetro doesn't have the same level of data visualization that Mentimeter possesses. The ability to interpret and present information in various formats such as bar graphs, pie charts, or a word cloud painting in Mentimeter can enhance comprehension and engagement for the participants.
Lower Variety of Question Types - EasyRetro can limit the types of responses you can solicit when compared to Mentimeter. Mentimeter has a wider variety of question types to choose from such as multiple choice, open ended, and ranking.

Pick #8

SessionLab is an advanced online platform primarily designed to aid users in creating and managing effective workshops, meetings, or training sessions. As an alternative to Mentimeter, a renowned meeting engagement software, SessionLab offers a robust toolkit for designing and facilitating collaborative sessions, but unlike Mentimeter which emphasizes interactivity during presentations through quizzes, polls, and Q&A features, SessionLab’s focus is more on planning and structuring these sessions. Its primary features include a comprehensive library of workshop activities, collaboration tools, time management capabilities, and the ability to share or export session plans, hence providing its users with a flexible framework for session design and delivery.

SessionLab offers a comprehensive workshop planner that can facilitate collaborative, real-time planning sessions. This helps teams structure their workshops or meetings in an interactive and visual way, while Mentimeter primarily focuses on real-time polls during presentations.
SessionLab's vast library of over 700 exercises enables users to build diverse, rich training, and team-building sessions. On the other hand, Mentimeter is more focused on creating interactive presentations and lacks a built-in library of team-building or training exercises.
SessionLab supports time management within your sessions, which is not a feature available in Mentimeter. By assigning time slots to specific activities, SessionLab ensures that your workshop or meeting stays on track.
The ability to leave notes, comments and share resources directly onto the workshop planner is a benefit of using SessionLab. This level of collaborative planning is not facilitated within Mentimeter.
SessionLab’s tool-oriented towards designing workshops and meetings from start to end, which includes the preparation, design, and execution phase. This is a differentiating factor from Mentimeter, which primarily aims to gather audience responses during a presentation.
Less interactive capabilities - While Mentimeter is designed with audience participation in mind, allowing for real-time polling and quizzes, SessionLab lacks these interactive capabilities. This makes it less effective for facilitators wanting real-time feedback.
No Audience Response System - Unlike Mentimeter, SessionLab does not have an integrated audience response system (ARS) which enables instant participant feedback during presentations or workshops.
Limited Multimedia embedding - Mentimeter allows users to embed photos, videos, GIFs, and other multimedia into their presentations, thus making them more engaging and interactive. SessionLab, on the other hand, mainly prioritizes workshop and session preparation, its capabilities in this area are inferior compared to Mentimeter.
Less appealing layout and design - While Mentimeter has a very modern and user-friendly design, SessionLab may seem less engaging with a less visually appealing interface, which may not be as effective in capturing the audience's attention.
Complexity and learning curve - SessionLab is primarily a planning and organization tool, it involves the use of complex software that can involve a steep learning curve for users who only need simple audience engagement tools. Compared to Mentimeter, it may take users more time to learn how to properly use SessionLab.

Pick #9 is an interactive tool specializing in boosting audience engagement during events, such as meetings or workshops, similar to It provides an interactive Q&A feature, live polling, and quizzing capabilities, while also often being utilized for gathering event analytics. Comparatively to Mentimeter, which uses quizzes and polls to engage audiences with displayed results in real-time, Slido offers a more streamlined focus on the Q&A segment of audience interaction, utilizing live polls and quizzes as well. Hence, it makes a viable alternative, depending on specific needs and priority on interactive features.

Slido offers a more focused feature set primarily for Q&A and polling, ideal for those who prioritize these features over the broader functionality of Mentimeter.
Slido integrates seamlessly with PowerPoint, enabling easy incorporation of interactive elements into your existing presentations without the need to switch between applications.
Slido provides detailed audience analytics which can offer valuable insights into participant engagement, helping users understand their audience better and shape their presentations based on the responses.
Slido allows users to moderate responses before they are displayed, which helps in maintaining discussions focused and avoiding any irrelevant or inappropriate audience input.
Slido has a cleaner and more intuitive user interface compared to Mentimeter, which makes it easier for first-time users to navigate and operate. This also contributes to better audience participation as the responses can be given easily and quickly.
While both Slido and Mentimeter support interaction with the audience through polls, Slido does not offer the variety of question types that Mentimeter does. Mentimeter allows you to create quizzes, open ended questions, multiple choice questions, and more. This lack of variety can limit the types of interactions users can have with their audience.
Slido is centered around Q&A and polling. Mentimeter, on the other hand, is more focused on creating interactive presentations. Therefore, you might find it less flexible if you want to integrate these interactions into your presentation seamlessly.
Slido does not offer as much customizability as Mentimeter. With Mentimeter, you can customize the colors, fonts, and backgrounds on your slides. This feature isn't available in Slido, which could be a downside if you are looking for a tool to help enhance your branding.
Mentimeter supports more interactive elements like image choice questions, ranking polls, multiple selection polls, and word clouds, making your presentation more engaging. Compared to Mentimeter, Slido's functionality in terms of audience participation elements is restrictive.
Slido also lacks an offline mode, unlike Mentimeter. So, if you have an unstable internet connection or if you are planning to use it in a place where the internet is not available, it might not work as smoothly.

Pick #10


Stormz is a real-time collaborative brainstorming tool that is viable as an alternative to Mentimeter, a leading meeting engagement software. Strikingly similar to Mentimeter in terms of facilitating interactive communication, Stormz allows teams to engage in creative thinking, ideation, and decision-making processes through its digital platform. Its core functionality is to enable users to generate, organize, prioritize, and convert ideas into actionable tasks, thereby promoting collective intelligence. While Mentimeter powers real-time voting, quizzes, Q&A sessions, and interactive presentations, Stormz combines brainstorming and consensus-building tools to deliver outcomes that lean more towards team collaboration and project management.

Enhanced Collaboration Tools: Stormz offers advanced collaboration features that allow for dynamic brainstorming and problem-solving. Users can contribute to ideas, leave feedback, and prioritize tasks in a highly collaborative environment which is not a particular strong point in Mentimeter.
Detailed Facilitation Process: Stormz goes beyond simple polling and voting. It offers a complete facilitation process for decision making where the group can define the issue, ideate solutions, develop them, vote and finally decide on the solution.
Better Visibility and Control: In Stormz, the results of brainstorming and polls are immediately visible, making it easy for everyone to be a part of the process, have control over the process and see the results.
Broad Range of Use: Stormz offers a versatile scope of use. Its use is not limited to just meetings and presentations, it can also be utilized in events, workshops, innovation programs, and other team-based activities, offering a wider usage spectrum than Mentimeter.
Emphasizes on Collective Intelligence: Stormz focuses on the concept of collective intelligence allowing for better quality decisions, as every participant is involved in the creative and decision-making process. This might be more appealing to corporates and academic institutions where collective brainstorming is valued.
Limited Audience Engagement: Unlike Mentimeter that supports quizzes, Q&A, polls, and slides, Stormz mainly focuses on team collaboration and brainstorming sessions. It may not engage the audience in large scale presentations or lectures as effectively.
Complexity for Users: Due to Stormz's rich set of features designed for intense collaboration, it might be more complex for users to understand and navigate, especially for users who are looking for a simple and straightforward tool like Mentimeter to conduct polls or surveys.
Limited Customization: Mentimeter provides more visual and customization options (like themes, color schemes, and slide designs) for polls and slides. Stormz's customization options are mainly for collaboration canvases and may not meet the preferences of users who value aesthetic considerations or specific brand alignments.
Restrictions on Facilitating Large Groups: Stormz explicitly states that they facilitate workshops rather than large crowds. On the other hand, Mentimeter, due to its simplicity in function, is a more adaptable platform for large audiences.
Limited Analytics: Stormz's analytics are mainly centered around team productivity and idea generation. If a user is seeking a comprehensive survey analytics, sentiment analysis, or instant polling results, Mentimeter offers more advanced, real-time data reporting and analytics capabilities.

Pick #11

AhaSlides is an interactive presentation software that serves as an alternative to Mentimeter for meeting engagement. Like Mentimeter, it provides users with tools for creating dynamic and engaging presentations, complete with live polls, quizzes, Q&As, word cloud, and even interactive charts. It fosters audience participation and feedback by allowing participants to interact with the presentation in real-time from their devices. Though similar, AhaSlides stands out for its cost effectiveness and more flexible pricing plans – it offers a similar feature set at a lower cost and also offers a free version with a good level of functionality.

AhaSlides features a game-oriented approach, which includes fun elements like quizzes, leaderboards, and interactive puzzles, fostering a more engaging audience interaction experience.
AhaSlides encourages collaborative learning and active participation by giving audience members the chance to contribute to the presentation in real-time, a feature that is less emphasized in Mentimeter.
AhaSlides offers a comparative abundance of slide types for free, including interactive graphs, brainstorm slides, and full flexibility on customizing slides, whereas Mentimeter's free version comes with limitations.
AhaSlides stands out for its easy and intuitive interface, making it simple for both presenters and audience members to navigate and manipulate, even without technical know-how, compared to Mentimeter.
AhaSlides accommodates more users per session, allowing up to 400 participants even in its free version. Mentimeter, on the other hand, restricts free sessions to a lower number of participants.
The customization options in AhaSlides are not as robust compared to Mentimeter. This could limit the ability to create slides that fully align with a brand or specific aesthetic preferences. A more user-friendly interface is present in Mentimeter than AhaSlides. The interface can be confusing, especially for new users, potentially slowing down the process of creating a presentation.
AhaSlides does not integrate with other software tools like Mentimeter does. The lack of integration can lead to inefficiencies if you are often using other tools such as Google Slides, PowerPoint, or PDFs.
The quality of customer support in AhaSlides is reportedly lower than that of Mentimeter. For users who run into issues or have questions, the support process can be slower and less resourceful.
AhaSlides does not have as wide a variety of interactive features as Mentimeter. This could limit engagement during presentations if attendees are expecting varied interactive experiences.


Mentimeter shines in scenarios where interactive presentations or meetings are crucial. It is the go-to option when you’re seeking to engage an audience in real-time, fostering a dynamic exchange of ideas. Its intuitive design enables presenters to seamlessly incorporate polls, quizzes, and Q&A sessions into their material, making it an ideal choice for educators, speakers, and team leaders who aim to maintain high levels of engagement and solicit instant feedback from participants. Using Mentimeter is particularly effective in large settings where direct interaction with each attendee is challenging, as it breaks down the communication barriers, ensuring everyone’s voice can be heard.

However, there are situations where considering an alternative software product may be more suitable. In environments where the focus is more on detailed project collaboration or in-depth data analysis, a platform specifically tailored to these requirements might offer better functionality. Such software would provide more robust tools for task management, file sharing, and editing capabilities that go beyond the interactive features of Mentimeter. Additionally, for smaller teams or groups where close interaction is already easily manageable without digital facilitation, a simpler, more streamlined tool might align better with their needs, offering a straightforward approach without the need for interactive polling or live feedback mechanisms.

Top 10: Best Mentimeter Alternative