The 10 Best MeetingKing Alternatives

The ten best MeetingKing alternatives provide comparative features, efficiencies, and tools to facilitate the planning, coordination, and execution of meetings, often with unique aspects that distinguish them from MeetingKing.

While MeetingKing offers a comprehensive set of features for meeting management, including task tracking, note-taking, and agenda creation, some users may seek alternatives for a variety of reasons. These reasons might include wanting a user interface that suits their personal preferences, requiring functionalities not offered by MeetingKing, such as integrations with other tools they are already using, desiring a different pricing structure that fits better with their budget, or experiencing problems with customer support. Furthermore, some individuals or businesses may prefer software solutions tailored to their specific industry or workflow.

Why would you look for Meetingking Alternative alternative?

In the ever-evolving landscape of project management and team collaboration, finding software that scales with the dynamic needs of your business is paramount. MeetingKing has been a notable player in facilitating organized meetings and action item tracking. However, as teams diversify and projects grow in complexity, the search for an alternative might be driven by the need for more nuanced functionalities such as integrated time zone support for global teams, enhanced customization options for meeting templates, or more sophisticated integration capabilities with other project management tools. The quest for a platform that not only keeps pace with industry standards but also anticipates the unique demands of your workflow could prompt the exploration beyond MeetingKing.

Furthermore, the digital collaboration environment demands not just functionality but also an intuitive user experience that can increase adoption rates across teams. Should users find MeetingKing’s interface less engaging or encounter a steep learning curve, it could lead to underutilization, thereby hampering team productivity and project timelines. In such instances, the pursuit of an alternative becomes not just a matter of feature comparison, but of seeking a solution that melds both powerful functionalities and user-centric design. This ensures that all team members, regardless of their tech savviness, can contribute effectively, making the software a catalyst for teamwork and success rather than a hurdle to overcome.

The Best Products

Meetingking Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, a high-efficiency meeting management software, is set to redefine collaborative team dynamics with its esteemed ability for note-taking, classification, and distribution during meetings. The software’s real-time note-taking functionality enables teams, regardless of size, to merge their efforts seamlessly, reducing the hassle of passing around notes manually, and ensuring everyone maintains the same perspective throughout meetings.

A remarkable feature offered by ZipDo is its live note-taking capability. This function ensures everyone present in meetings remains updated, removing the necessity for a manual note exchange. After meetings, participants can conveniently amend or supplement the notes, guaranteeing the most current information circulation.

Excelling in the field of note arrangement, ZipDo facilitates such notes to be easily sorted into channels or directories. Search-facilitated notes improve expediency, facilitating speedy access to particular details without the need for lengthy scrolling or manual retrieval.

Highlighting the security aspect, ZipDo’s note allocation offers meticulous access control, endorsing the secure exchange of data with colleagues, clients, or partners. Its integration with calendars automates cooperative note development for each session, eradicates manual data entry.

To sum it up, ZipDo is an intuitive software offering a comprehensive suite of utilities that enhances team productivity, collaboration, and project administration. Its instantaneous note-taking, collective editing, orderly arrangement, searchability, secure sharing, and easy integrations render it an indispensable asset, streamlining meeting administration and ensuring effective project progression.

Pick #2 serves as an alternative to by offering a comprehensive platform for effective meeting management and team collaboration. Beyond just scheduling and planning as does, integrates with other productivity tools, and allows for actionable meeting notes, agenda setting, to-do assignments, and tracks meeting-related tasks. It fosters real-time collaboration, enables the setting of meeting agendas, sharing of conversation topics, and facilitates actions points collaboration for follow-up after the meetings. By focusing on the performance and productivity of teams, offers a more streamlined, inclusive, and action-oriented approach to meeting management.

Streamlined Collaboration: provides a more integrated environment for team collaboration. It creates a central workspace that allows members to draft agendas, take notes, assign tasks, and give feedback all in the same platform.
Integration with Other Work Tools: can integrate effortlessly with a wide range of other productivity tools, such as Slack, Google calendar, Zoom, and Office 365. This makes the transition easier for teams already using these systems.
AI-Powered Assistance: The AI-powered assistance feature of provides meaningful insights, helps prioritize tasks and even suggests conversation topics or questions, offering a more personalized and efficient approach to meeting management.
Synchronous & Asynchronous Communication: In addition to meeting management tools, also includes functions for both synchronous (real-time interaction) and asynchronous (non-real-time interaction) communication. This supports more flexible and efficient team communication.
Standardized Workflows: is designed to standardize workflows and promote consistency in meeting procedures. This includes the use of customizable templates and automatic tasks assignment, which helps to optimize productivity and efficiency.
Limited Integration: While MeetingKing has a broad range of integration options with other common workplace apps like Evernote, OneNote, Zendesk, etc.,'s integration is mainly limited to a selected few like Slack, Google Calendar, and Zoom. This lack of integration support can limit functionality for some users.
Feature Limitation: MeetingKing offers a more feature-rich environment including agenda-creation, task management, and topics hierarchy, whereas tends to be more narrow focused on agenda management and action items. The limited set of features can prove limiting for some users.
UI Complexity: While MeetingKing's layout is straightforward and beginner-friendly,'s user interface, though aesthetically pleasing, could come across as slightly more complicated for new users.
Limited Visual Representation: MeetingKing offers visual agenda and task displays making it easy to see a road map of your meeting or project at a glance. However, does not have as much of a visual representation feature, which could be an issue when comparing it against MeetingKing.
Limited Customizability: MeetingKing users can create custom templates, giving them more control over their arrangements for different kinds of meetings or projects. In contrast, has less customization options, which may not satisfy users who need specific layouts and templates.

Pick #3 is an intelligent meeting content management platform designed for full lifecycle management of meetings from scheduling, participant tracking, and actionable meeting agenda creation, to documentation of notes, decisions, and actions items. provides an alternative to by integrating with various popular platforms (like Slack, Google Workspace, and Microsoft 365), making your meeting workflow seamless. Also packed with features like projects, smart search, and meeting insights, it provides a rich, progressive user interface to effectively manage and monitor meetings, ensuring higher productivity and optimized outcomes.

AI-powered Transcription: utilizes artificial intelligence to transcription, which is useful for recording and documenting all details of a meeting. This feature is not available in MeetingKing, making more effective for note-taking and reviewing meeting contents.
Meeting Intelligence: offers not only simple meeting management features but it also provides meeting insights that allow users to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of their meetings. This data-driven approach exceeds the functionalities of the basic meeting record system in MeetingKing.
Integrations: offers integration with a broader range of applications like Zapier, Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, etc., which allows users to integrate their meeting management into their existing productivity ecosystem. This level of integration may not be possible with MeetingKing.
Content Management: allows users to upload and share files with attendees before, during, and after the meeting. This comprehensive content management is unlike MeetingKing, which lacks a centralized system for managing all meeting-related documents.
Task Assignment: provides a very handy feature to assign tasks to meeting participants, track their progress, and enable collaboration in real-time. This feature proves more effective in terms of maintaining post-meeting productivity as compared to MeetingKing, which does not offer this same level of task management. does not offer the more intuitive and streamlined task management system that MeetingKing does. For example, it lacks the system that MeetingKing has for automatically turning meeting minutes into tasks. does not have the robust meeting agenda customization options that offers. This can interfere with the ease and efficiency of planning and structuring meetings.
The system of sending automatic email reminders to attendees that MeetingKing uses is not as advanced in the meeting management system. lacks the feature of MeetingKing's shared workspace where all users can view and modify documents in real time, which might result in communication and collaboration difficulties among team members.
The user interface of is not as user-friendly and intuitive as that of MeetingKing, which can result in more necessary training and adjustment period for staff members.

Pick #4, also known as Decisions, is an alternative to in the Meeting Management Software space. While MeetingKing offers task assignments, decision-making protocols, and meeting planning features, Decisions offers additional distinctive features like direct integration with Microsoft Teams and Office 365. This allows users to utilize meeting workspaces, collaborative agendas, motion voting, and automated meeting minutes within a familiar digital environment, which can translate to greater ease of use for teams already accustomed to Microsoft’s business software suite. Decisions thus serves as a robust and feature-rich alternative to MeetingKing, especially for businesses heavily reliant on Microsoft’s productivity tools.

Advanced Integration: Meeting Decisions offers direct integration with the Microsoft Office 365 suite, allowing users to synchronise their calendars, share files through OneDrive and use SharePoint for team collaboration. This seamless integration can make it more efficient and user-friendly than MeetingKing, particularly for teams already utilizing the Microsoft ecosystem.
Agile Methodology support: Meeting Decisions has features that support Agile project management. It allows for structuring meetings based on agile rituals like daily stand-ups, sprint reviews, or retrospectives, which is not explicitly provided by MeetingKing.
Task Management emphasis: Meeting Decisions includes robust task management features. It allows users to input tasks directly during meetings, assign team members, and set deadlines, creating a clear line from discussion to actionable steps.
Rich & Interactive Agenda: Meeting Decisions provides expansive agenda creation functionality. It not only lets users set and share agendas before the meeting but also rearrange topics live during the meeting and share comments and documents under each topic.
Real-time Minutes and Notes capture: With Meeting Decisions, meetings can have live minutes that participants can view and contribute to simultaneously. This encourages accountability and comprehensive record-keeping, in contrast to MeetingKing where the note management system may be less dynamic and collaborative.
Integration Limitations: While Meeting Decisions offers integrations for specific business tools like Microsoft Office 365 and Teams, it lacks the diverse range of integrations that MeetingKing offers, such as with Evernote and Dropbox, potentially disrupting workflow and productivity for businesses heavily reliant on these platforms.
Interface Complexity: Meeting Decisions has a more complex user interface compared to MeetingKing. For users who are not technologically savvy, making the switch could introduce a steep learning curve and slow down adoption.
Meeting Templates: MeetingKing provides a variety of pre-built meeting templates that can be a major time-saver. In contrast, Meeting Decisions does not offer as many built-in templates which can make creating regular or similar kinds of meetings more time consuming.
Absence of Task Delegation Feature: MeetingKing allows users to assign tasks directly from meeting agendas or notes, an ease-of-use feature that Meeting Decisions does not offer. This can create added steps and complicate the post-meeting process.
Reporting Functionality: MeetingKing provides reporting functionality that helps users track task progression quickly. In contrast, Meeting Decisions' progress tracking capabilities are not as robust, which could make it challenging to monitor action items and follow up on tasks.

Pick #5 is a comprehensive work management platform that serves as an alternative to for managing meetings. Unlike MeetingKing, Hypercontext focuses on integrating individual and team goal-setting with daily tasks and meeting agendas, allowing for enhanced collaboration and productivity. The platform offers numerous features that aid in preparing for meetings, sharing agendas, tracking outcomes, and holding individuals accountable for assigned tasks. In essence, it provides a more streamlined, goal-oriented approach to meeting management, enabling teams to align their efforts toward achieving common objectives.

Enhanced Team Collaboration: Hypercontext allows users to set shared meeting agendas, discuss them interactively, and set action items, fostering better collaboration. While MeetingKing does offer similar features, Hypercontext's interface is more dedicated to promoting interaction and inclusivity within the team.
Integration Efficiency: Hypercontext integrates more efficiently with other commonly used tools such as Slack, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Teams, making it more convenient for teams that use these platforms. In contrast, MeetingKing does not provide these integration capabilities.
Feedback Capabilities: Hypercontext allows employees to share feedback privately with managers, contributing to more open lines of communication. This feature isn't available with MeetingKing, which is more focused on task management and meeting organization.
OKR Tracking: With Hypercontext, teams can track Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) directly within the platform, while meeting. This makes it easy for team members to align on goals and track progress over time. MeetingKing, however, does not have direct capabilities to handle OKR tracking.
Real-Time Updates on Actionable Items: Hypercontext allows teams to create, assign, and track action items in real-time, during the meeting. This can facilitate more proactive work habits and ensure that everyone is on the same page. While MeetingKing does allow for task assignment, it doesn't offer this interactive, real-time feature.
Lack of Task Delegation: Hypercontext lacks the extensive task delegation capability found in MeetingKing. While you can assign action items to individuals in Hypercontext, there's a limit to its task assignment functionality compared to the clearer, timeline-based task management system in MeetingKing.
Interface Complexity: Hypercontext, although feature-rich, may present a steeper learning curve than MeetingKing due to its more complex interface. Where MeetingKing is quite streamlined and intuitive, users may need more time to navigate and understand how Hypercontext works.
Limited Integration: Hypercontext does offer integrations with other tools, but in comparison to MeetingKing's extensive integration capabilities, especially with email platforms, it falls a bit short. This could impact efficiency and workflow fluidity.
Narrow Meeting Focus: Hypercontext is heavily focused on one-on-ones and team meetings structure, and may not be as versatile as MeetingKing for a wider variety of meeting types. For organizations where unstructured or impromptu meetings are prevalent, Hypercontext might be restrictive.
Lacks Public API: Unlike MeetingKing, Hypercontext doesn’t yet offer a public API, which means it may not offer as much flexibility to businesses in customizing and integrating it with their preexisting systems or any other specific tools compatible with APIs.

Pick #6

Lucid Meetings is an online meeting management software platform, much like, designed to streamline the process of organizing and conducting virtual meetings. This platform, however, stands out for its robust features and versatility. It allows teams to manage meetings with detailed agendas, helps assign tasks, enables sharing of notes and decisions, supports collaboration during live meetings, and works to keep all participants in the loop with follow-ups. It also integrates with popular productivity tools, offers templates for various meeting types and prides itself on advanced facilitation features. These attributes, among others, make Lucid Meetings a sound alternative to

Advanced Agenda Making: LucidMeetings offers more comprehensive and customizable tools for designing meeting agendas. You can time-box items, assign leaders, link to documents, and pre-load decisions.
Integrated Meeting and Action Item Follow-Up: LucidMeetings has a robust system to track action items, decisions, and notes in one place. This differs from MeetingKing, which doesn’t deeply integrate the follow-up process into their meeting platform.
Multi-Meeting View: LucidMeetings provides a view of all upcoming meetings in one place, helping managers and team members have a larger perspective of the organizational workflow, which is less clear on MeetingKing.
Exemplary Technical Support: LucidMeetings is known for their effective and helpful customer support. They offer a library of templates and guides and a responsive technical team, making the transition and use of their software less challenging.
More Intuitive User Interface: While both platforms are generally easy to use, some users find LucidMeetings' interface to be more intuitive and visually appealing, making it easier for new users to get the hang of the platform.
Comparatively, LucidMeetings has an interface that is more complex and requires a steeper learning curve, in contrast to MeetingKing's intuitive and user-friendly interface. This can contribute to needing more setup time and initial training.
Unlike MeetingKing, which integrates task management within the meeting environment for post-meeting follow-ups, LucidMeetings requires an additional integration with task management software, making it less streamlined.
MeetingKing allows for the easy transformation of discussion points into tasks, action items or notes, a feature that seems to be less fluid in LucidMeetings.
LucidMeetings does not possess as robust a feature set for automated meeting minutes, which MeetingKing provides. LucidMeetings requires more manual effort to create and distribute minutes.
MeetingKing offers an intuitive visual overview of agendas and meetings, making it easier for users to perceive meeting progress and schedules. LucidMeetings, on the other hand, possesses a more text-heavy interface, which can be more cumbersome for users to navigate.

Pick #7 is a comprehensive meeting management software that positions itself as a viable alternative to It offers an intuitive and seamless interface for managing meetings from end-to-end. Users can organize meetings, prepare agendas, record detailed minutes and assign tasks in real time. Unlike MeetingKing, Beenote promotes a paperless environment, focuses heavily on task follow-up mechanism and provides audio-to-text transcription service for meeting minutes. It also gives users the ability to integrate with platforms such as Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Zoom, heightening the software’s accessibility and convenience for remote teams. With features designed to significantly improve efficiency and effectiveness of meetings, presents a strong alternative to traditional meeting software like

Task Tracking in Real-Time: Beenote allows team members to perform task tracking, edits, and updates in real time which results in enhanced productivity, something that may not be present in MeetingKing.
Multilingual Support: Unlike MeetingKing, Beenote supports multiple languages. This makes it a more convenient choice for diverse teams that have people from different linguistic backgrounds.
Audio to Text Transcription: Beenote includes an audio to text transcription service. This can be particularly helpful during meetings where not everyone may be able to take notes quickly and efficiently.
Calendar Synchronization: Beenote provides a robust calendar synchronization feature with Outlook and Google Calendar, providing an edge over MeetingKing in terms of scheduling and organizing your meetings seamlessly.
User-Friendly Interface: Beenote presents a clean, straightforward user interface that is aesthetically pleasing. The simplicity and intuitive design of Beenote's UI may be considered superior by some users when compared to MeetingKing.
Less Integration Capabilities. Compared to MeetingKing, Beenote does not support as many integrations, which can limit its functionality and efficiency in use with other software such as email or cloud storage services.
Fewer Types of Meeting Templates. Beenote has fewer types of predefined meeting templates than MeetingKing. This may limit the variety and flexibility in preparing for different kinds of meetings.
Time Consumption. Beenote might take more time in data input and setting up the meetings due to its user interface. In contrast, MeetingKing has a simpler and more intuitive interface conducive to faster setup and execution of meetings.
Inefficiency in Task Management. MeetingKing comes with better task management features like task delegation and monitoring right from the dashboard, which are lacking or less efficient in Beenote.
Limited Automated Transcription. Beenote, unlike MeetingKing, does not provide an automated transcription service, making it harder to record and revisit meeting discussions. This makes reviewing the content of meetings, especially longer ones, more time-consuming and difficult.

Pick #8 is an advanced, powerful meeting management software, similar to MeetingKing. It serves as an alternative by offering an integrated platform to significantly enhance the productivity and efficiency of meetings. MeetingBooster comprises notable features like centralized storage for meeting minutes, automated task assignment, and tracking functionalities that allow easier follow-ups. It also provides structured and methodical tools for organizing, conducting, and managing meetings, eliminating common issues such as lack of accountability and ineffective communication. Like MeetingKing, it aids in improving collaboration and decision-making processes in various business environments.

Enhanced Task Management: MeetingBooster comes with comprehensive task management features that offer more enhanced management options than MeetingKing. This includes assigning tasks to particular users, priority settings, and a better overview of task progress.
Professional Meeting Minutes Templates: MeetingBooster provides plenty of professional templates for meeting minutes, enabling users to create standardized notes and reports more efficiently than MeetingKing.
Better Integration Capabilities: MeetingBooster has an extensive integration capacity, supporting integration with several other tools like Outlook, Google, IBM Notes, which enriches its functionality beyond what MeetingKing can offer.
Advanced Agenda Preparation: MeetingBooster enables users to create a structured, pre-meeting agenda, which enhances the efficiency and productivity of meetings. This is a feature that is not as well developed in MeetingKing.
Elaborate Analytical Reports: MeetingBooster includes a reporting feature that allows users to generate detailed reports for analyzing the productivity of meetings, providing more insights than the reporting features in MeetingKing.
Limited Integration: MeetingBooster does not offer as many integration options as MeetingKing. MeetingKing integrates with other productivity tools like Evernote, while MeetingBooster does not.
User Interface: The user interface of MeetingBooster is not as intuitive as MeetingKing’s. Users have reported that they need time to get used to MeetingBooster’s layout and workflow.
Less Flexible Meeting Agenda: Creating meeting agendas on MeetingBooster is relatively rigid, while MeetingKing provides more flexibility in designing and modifying meeting agendas.
Less Efficient Task Management: Unlike MeetingKing that allows assigning multiple people to a task, MeetingBooster only allows one person to be assigned to a particular task which can be limiting for team collaboration.
Absence of Time Tracking Feature: MeetingBooster lacks a time tracking feature which is present in MeetingKing. This feature in MeetingKing allows users to effectively manage time during meetings and ensure that all topics are adequately covered.

Pick #9

MagicMinutes ( encompasses all aspects of meeting management, ensuring an efficient, organized approach to corporate meetings. As an alternative to MeetingKing, it offers features such as pre-meeting agenda setting, real-time minute taking, and automatic generation of the minutes document post meeting, ensuring accountability by tracking actions assigned during meetings. MagicMinutes also allows for document sharing, making it easy to access necessary files during and after meetings. Its focus lies on reducing time spent on meeting administration tasks, allowing companies to focus their energy on their core business.

Task Integration: Magic Minutes provides integrated task tracking, enabling tasks to be assigned during the meeting, with all details recorded within the minutes. This is advantageous over MeetingKing, which does not provide the same level of direct in-built task management.
Automatic Minute Circulation: Magic Minutes automatically circulates minutes and agendas to designated recipients. These real-time updates can be an edge over MeetingKing, which can save a lot of time usually spent on coordinating and communicating separately.
Accessible History: Every meeting is automatically saved in a series of previous meetings where one can easily go back and review any historical session. This provides a structured and more user-friendly way to keep track of past meetings as compared to the MeetingKing.
Agenda Customisation: Magic Minutes permits full customization of the meeting agenda. This allows to insert complex agenda items which might not be possible with MeetingKing. This allows user to have better control over the meetings' structure.
Improved Documentation: Magic Minutes offer PDF and Word outputs for your minutes and allows real-time drafting of the minutes within the system. This feature improves efficiency and organisation of files and documents as compared to MeetingKing.
Limited Intuitiveness: When used as a MeetingKing alternative, users may find MagicMinutes less user-friendly. The interface may not be as clean and intuitive as MeetingKing, leading to a longer learning curve especially for those not as tech-savvy.
No Built-In Workspace: Unlike MeetingKing, MagicMinutes does not have a built-in workspace for meeting attendees to collaborate. This could make the management of the various aspects of a meeting slightly more complicated.
Not as Comprehensive for Task Management: MeetingKing provides a more comprehensive task management by allowing users to assign, track, and manage tasks with reminders and status updates. MagicMinutes, although it offers task management, might not be as thorough.
Lesser Integration: While MeetingKing offers more flexible integration with many popular calendars such as Google, Outlook, and iCal, MagicMinutes may not provide the same range of integrations, potentially limiting its usefulness for people or companies committed to certain productivity ecosystems.
Lack of Brainstorming Tools: If you're planning a brainstorming session, MeetingKing is equipped with features designed for such an exercise. Unfortunately, Magic Minutes doesn't seem to have similarly dedicated brainstorming tools, which might limit creativity and collaboration in meetings.

Pick #10 is an incredible tool created to enhance and streamline task management and productivity, designed specifically for personal and group organization. As an alternative to Meeting Management Software like, Wedo provides an integrated platform that enables users to create, assign, and track various tasks, making organising meetups, projects, and general errands more efficient. With its clean interface and user-friendly design, users can segment tasks into sub-tasks, add detailed notes, set reminders, and share their progress with team members or family. Unlike MeetingKing, which primarily focuses on meeting management, Wedo offers more versatility by extending its organizational capabilities beyond just professional environments to personal space. However, Wedo may lack the structure and features that MeetingKing offers for managing and documenting meetings.

Comprehensive Task Management: As a alternative, offers superior task management features engineered to drive productivity within teams. This includes creating, assigning, and tracking tasks through completion, which empowers teams to have a more organized collaboration structure.
User-friendly Interface: Wedo's interface is more intuitive and easy-to-use compared to MeetingKing. This can significantly reduce the time taken for new users to become proficient, thereby enhancing their productivity.
Better Integration: Wedo boasts a wider range of interaction with popular third-party platforms, increasing its compatibility with existing team's technology stack, lending itself to smoother operations and increasing efficiency.
Habit Tracking: A unique feature of Wedo is that it allows users to build and track their habits. This can be a powerful tool to promote certain behaviors and track team progress towards specific goals that are not directly related to tasks or projects.
More Customization Options: Wedo provides more options for customization, allowing teams to tailor their experience to better suit their workflow and preferences. Whether it's organizing tasks in a specific way or setting reminders based on priority and deadlines, Wedo's customization offers an enhanced user experience.
Usability - MeetingKing has an easy-to-understand interface, it's intuitive and easy to navigate. Meanwhile, WEDO's interface is also well-organized but may require some learning curve, making it less user-friendly than MeetingKing.
Focus on Task Management - WEDO primarily focuses on task management rather than meeting organization. This means the platform might lack some specific features for planning and managing meetings that MeetingKing provides such as discussion points, note-taking, and tracking decisions.
No Meeting Specific Tools - MeetingKing offers dedicated features for meetings like creating agendas, meeting minutes and tracking tasks related to meetings., whereas WEDO lacks that focus.
Integration capabilities - MeetingKing can be integrated with Outlook and Google Calendar, which is immensely beneficial for scheduling and planning meetings. WEDO, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with calendar applications, causing potential scheduling inconveniences.
Fewer Team Collaboration Features - MeetingKing offers advanced collaborative features like decision tracking, assignment of tasks created during meetings, and note sharing. WEDO, mainly focused on task and project management, may not offer the same level of collaborative tools specific to the context of meetings.

Pick #11 is a data-driven platform that provides solutions for streamlining projects, tasks, and team collaboration. Unlike MeetingKing which is centred mainly around meeting management with features such as agenda setting, meeting scheduling, and minutes tracking, offers comprehensive project and task management functionality. Apollo’s key features include timely project updates, task assignment, communication tools, team member’s detailed work analysis, and other project management capabilities., therefore, positions itself as a more extensive productivity and task management tool compared to MeetingKing with its focus on meeting management.

Based on research and available information at the time of writing, here are some specific advantages of over MeetingKing:
Advanced Task Management - provides a richer task management system, where it organizes tasks by project with due dates, reminders, and descriptions, improving the productivity of the team. In comparison, MeetingKing focuses more on meeting management, with task management as a supplementary feature.
Integrated Customer Relationship Management - has integrated Customer Relationship Management (CRM) features like contact management and sales pipeline tracking that are not present in MeetingKing. This feature allows businesses to keep track of client interactions and sales prospects within the same software.
Project Management - Apollo provides full-fledged project management tools, allowing users to plan, execute, and track the progress of projects. This is a considerable advantage over MeetingKing, which primarily deals with meeting management.
Comprehensive Dashboards - offers more comprehensive dashboards that demonstrate the overall health of the business, project statuses, and team member tasks, which MeetingKing doesn't have.
Multi-Channel Communication - supports several communication methods, including email and in-app messaging, providing a unified communication platform. MeetingKing does not have this kind of integrated communication option.
Unlike MeetingKing that provides detailed and structured meeting minutes, lacks a sophisticated meeting notes feature, which means users may struggle to take and share meeting notes effectively. focuses a lot more on project management features, which could be overwhelming for users who are looking for a simple, dedicated meeting management tool like MeetingKing.
MeetingKing offers automatic task assignment and tracking feature through minutes of meetings, while does not have such an integrated feature, making follow-ups and task management difficult after meetings.
MeetingKing facilitates the preparation before each meeting with structured agendas, whereas does not offer a specific feature for agenda setting and sharing.
MeetingKing has a simple, user-friendly interface, but, because of its extensive project management features, can be initially confusing or complex for new users to navigate, especially if they are only interested in managing meetings.


MeetingKing excels in scenarios where structured meeting management, task delegation, and follow-up are paramount. It’s tailor-made for users seeking to streamline their meeting process, from creating agendas to documenting decisions and assigning tasks. This tool shines in environments where collaboration and accountability are key, such as project teams, boards, and committees. If your primary goal is to ensure that meetings lead to actionable outcomes and clear records, MeetingKing offers a robust solution that simplifies the complexities of meeting management.

On the other hand, opting for an alternative software product might be more conducive in situations where the focus is on real-time communication and instant collaboration, without the need for detailed meeting planning and follow-up. For users who prioritize video conferencing features, informal team catch-ups, or direct messaging capabilities to spur spontaneous collaboration, an alternative platform might better align with their needs. In such cases, a tool with a leaner approach to meetings, emphasizing ease of use and real-time interaction, could foster a more dynamic and immediate communication culture within teams.

Top 10: Best Meetingking Alternative