Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Loom Alternatives

Explore a variety of video recording and sharing platforms that offer comprehensive features, user-friendly interfaces, and advanced functionalities similar to Loom.

Learn more about our top picks for: Loom Alternative

While Loom is a popular choice for screen recording and collaborative work, there are several reasons why a user might search for an alternative. One major reason could be cost-effectiveness, as the free version of Loom is relatively limited and the premium versions may be outside the budget of some users. Other reasons could include the search for specific features not present in Loom, such as advanced editing tools, or higher quality resolution for recordings. Additionally, some users may prefer a tool that places less demand on system resources, supporting smoother performance on older or less powerful devices. Compatibility with a specific operating system or platform not supported by Loom could be another reason for opting for an alternative screen recording software.

Why would you look for Loom Alternative alternative?

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, finding the perfect tool for video messaging and screen recording can be quite the quest. While Loom has certainly marked its territory as a frontrunner, various factors might propel users to seek alternatives. One primary reason could be the quest for features that better align with specific project requirements or workflow preferences. Different software solutions offer unique functionalities, such as advanced editing capabilities, enhanced security measures, or superior integration with other tools. This diversity allows users to tailor their choice to fit their exact needs, potentially leading to more efficient and effective communication.

Additionally, cost considerations play a pivotal role in the decision-making process. Every organization, from startups to established enterprises, operates with budget constraints. When the cost of maintaining a Loom subscription overshadows its perceived value, or when faced with unexpected pricing changes, users might feel compelled to explore other options. Moreover, the pursuit of software that offers a more user-friendly interface or better customer support can significantly impact user satisfaction and productivity. In essence, the dynamic nature of business and technology means that what works today may not be the best fit tomorrow, prompting users to continually reassess their tool choices.

The Best Products

Loom Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, a cutting-edge remote work utility, takes teamwork effectiveness to a new level by redefining the process of taking, organizing, and distributing meeting notes in the virtual workspace. Its superior features like real-time note-taking, mutual content modifying, and seamless integration with widely-used calendars and work enhancement tools make it an unmatched resource for remote workspaces of all scales.

A unique attribute of ZipDo is its live note-recording. This guarantees everyone remains in sync during remote meetings, eliminating the need for traditional note trading. After a meeting ends, team members are facilitated to modify and expand these notes, ensuring the latest information is always accessible.

Strategically managing notes is an area where ZipDo shines. Ample room for easy division of notes into distinctive channels or files makes organization a breeze. The note search capability raises efficacy, offering fast access to precise details, bypassing tiresome scrolling or manual lookups.

The secure access control feature of ZipDo allows for confidential information sharing with colleagues, clients, or partners, ensuring that your virtual collaborations remain guarded. Calendar integrations automate co-creation of notes for every meeting, nullifying manual input.

In a nutshell, ZipDo is an intuitive remote-work app, replete with robust features aimed at enhancing team productivity, encouraging online cooperation, and improving project management. Its portfolio of real-time note-taking, collaborative editing, organization, searchability, controlled sharing, and integrations certainly makes it a priceless tool that can simplify virtual meeting handling and assure productive project advancements.

Pick #2 provides a dynamic platform for video conferencing, webinars, live chat, and mobile collaboration. Even though it is primarily used for video conferencing, its screen sharing feature can be an alternative to’s screen recording software in specific contexts. While Loom offers asynchronous video communication, allowing users to record screen activity and share with others to view in their own time, Zoom’s screen sharing feature works best in real-time situations where synchronous communication and interaction are needed. However, Zoom does not have native features for annotations and drawings on the recorded screen which Loom has. Thus, it’s not a direct alternative but could be used differently based on use case requirements.

Higher Participant Capacity - Zoom allows meetings with up to 1000 participants, depending on the package, which is greater than what Loom offers. This makes it great for larger meetings, webinars, or public events.
Real-Time Engagement Features - Zoom offers interactive features like real-time chatting, screen sharing, virtual hand-raising, Q&A, polling, and breakout rooms which can boost attendee engagement. This differs from Loom which is mainly used for one-way video messaging.
In-Meeting Annotation Tools - Zoom provides in-meeting annotation tools allowing participants to draw on, highlight, or make notes on the screen share. This could enhance collaborative efforts during meetings.
Virtual Backgrounds and Touch Up My Appearance - Unlike Loom, Zoom offers exciting extras like virtual backgrounds, including video, and touch-up-my-appearance feature which can give a professional look and feel to your meetings.
Zoom Webinars - Zoom offers a Webinar feature that allows for more control over audience interaction and has useful tools for webinars like registration, invite emails, Q&A, poll, raise hand, and post-webinar reporting. In contrast, Loom does not have a specific functionality for webinars.
Zoom is predominantly a real-time video conferencing tool, unlike Loom which is primarily for asynchronous video sharing. This could pose a problem as users may want to record and share videos at their convenience rather than appoint a specific time for meetings.
Video editing capabilities of Zoom are significantly limited compared to Loom. Users cannot trim their videos, add callouts, or annotations directly in Zoom as they could in Loom.
In terms of content management, Zoom does not offer the same level of functionality as compared to Loom. With Loom, users can organize their videos in a library where they can easily access and manage their content while Zoom primarily functions as a hosting platform for real-time meetings.
Zoom requires both parties (the presenter and the viewer) to be present at the same time to conduct a meeting. This could be seen as a disadvantage for those who prefer to record their screen and share the video at a later time. Loom, on the other hand, enables asynchronous communication which allows flexibility in timing for both parties.
Loom provides ease with screen and video recording capabilities – something which Zoom doesn’t offer natively. For example, if a user wants to record a tutorial or walkthrough, they may find Loom more suitable to their needs as compared to Zoom.

Pick #3 is a comprehensive suite of solutions for different business needs, from video conferencing to IT support tools. As an alternative to the Screen Recording software, GoTo’s screen sharing and recording functionalities offered by its products like GoToMeeting provide a user-friendly and efficient system for capturing screen activity. With features such as HD quality, one-click meetings, and integration with popular calendar services, users can easily record, save, and share their screen activities. However, it’s important to note that is wider in scope than Loom, providing more than just screen recording solutions.

Comprehensive Unification - GoTo offers a unified platform that combines video conferencing, voice calls, team messaging, and more. This can streamline work processes as users do not need to alternate between different programs for different tasks.
Advanced Meeting Features - GoToMeeting, a feature on the GoTo platform, has advanced meeting features like Drawing Tools and Project Management features which are not present in a platform like Loom, adding depth to its functionality and enabling more interactive and effective online meetings.
Toll-Free and Call Me Features - Unlike Loom, GoTo offers a Toll-Free option and a Call Me feature for premium packages. These options can enhance accessibility and convenience for users, making it easier for clients and partners to connect.
Large-Scale Webinar Functionality - The GoToSuite includes GoToWebinar, a tool specifically designed for large-scale presentations and webinars which Loom does not specifically cater to. This feature makes GoTo more suitable for businesses intending to host big online events or webinars.
Integrations and Compatibility - GoTo seamlessly integrates with popular tools such as Salesforce, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Office 365. While Loom does have some integrations, GoTo's compatibility is more extensive, offering a smoother workflow and ease of use.
Video Editing: Unlike Loom, GoTo does not offer robust video editing capabilities. This can make it difficult to create professional level tutorials, demos, or other types of videos which would benefit from editing.
Screen and Webcam Recording: Loom provides a feature that simultaneously records screen and webcam. This is particularly beneficial for personalized messages or demonstrations. GoTo, on the other hand, lacks this feature, hampering the communication effectiveness.
Integration: Loom has the advantage of seamless integration with apps like Slack, Gmail, and others. This makes sharing and accessing videos more convenient. GoTo does not offer the same level of integration with these daily used apps.
User Interface: Loom's user interface is very intuitive and it's much easier for new users to pick up and start using right away. On the other hand, GoTo can be relatively hard to navigate for users who are not overly tech-savvy, leading to a higher learning curve.
Sharing Options: Loom offers easy and versatile sharing options including a unique link, embedded code, or downloadable file. GoTo's sharing options, while present, are not as extensive or easy to use.

Pick #4, created by Cisco Systems, is an online conferencing platform that provides video and voice calling, meeting planning and recording, screen sharing as well as interactive functions such as polls, Q&A, chat, and file sharing. As an alternative to, a cloud-based screen recording software, Webex offers more comprehensive functionalities. Unlike Loom which primarily focuses on screen recording and sharing, Webex enables not just screen capture but also real-time collaboration and interaction. This makes it suitable for larger teams or organizations that require advanced communication and collaborative tools in addition to screen capturing. However, if the sole purpose is lightweight screen recording and sharing, Loom might be a simpler and more streamlined solution.

Comprehensive Meeting Capabilities - Unlike Loom, which primarily focuses on video messaging, Webex offers a full suite of collaboration tools including video conferencing, webinars, interactive whiteboard sessions, and even in-app calling. This means you can have real-time meetings and share files using the same platform.
Integration with Other Platforms - Webex integrates well with other popular productivity tools, such as Microsoft Teams, Google Calendar, and Slack. This means you can schedule and start Webex meetings directly from these platforms, which might not be possible with Loom.
Advanced A.I. Features - Webex includes AI-powered features such as Webex Assistant and People Insights. These features can help automate tasks like taking meeting notes or provide personal insights about the participants in the meeting, features which are not available in Loom.
Large Group Meetings - Webex can support meetings with up to 200 participants in its standard plans, with the option to include even more with enterprise plans. This is beneficial for large corporations or events, something that might not be feasible with Loom.
In-depth Training and Support - Compared to Loom, Webex provides an extensive array of training materials and 24/7 customer support. This ensures users can get the most out of their software and troubleshoot any issues they may encounter.
Webex's emphasis on live, interactive meetings makes it less efficient for asynchronous collaboration. Loom, on the other hand, allows for the creation, sharing, and storage of to-the-point video messages that help in asynchronous collaboration.
Unlike Loom, which is more user-friendly with its intuitive and straightforward interface, Webex has a somewhat sophisticated interface which can be more difficult to navigate for less tech-savvy individuals.
Webex does not include native video editing tools. Loom, however, includes basic editing tools, which allow users to trim their videos or add calls-to-action directly within the application - a feature crucial for creation of instructional or explanatory videos.
Loom offers an unlimited recording time for its paid plans, while Webex has limits on the length of meetings that can be recorded.
Despite having robust features for live meetings and webinars, Webex lacks the simplicity and ease of recording a screen capture or webcam video that Loom specializes in, which would be an important feature for users looking for a straightforward video messaging tool.

Pick #5

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams is a unified communication and collaboration tool that provides a platform for workplace chat, video meetings, file storage, and application integration. While it is not a direct alternative to Loom, which is a screen recording software, Microsoft Teams does have capabilities for screen sharing during video meetings, offering live demonstrations and real-time collaboration. However, it does not offer the same in-depth screen recording and sharing features, such as video messages and on-screen annotation, as provided by Loom. Therefore, while Teams can be used for basic screen sharing in live situations, it is not a full replacement for a dedicated screen recording software like Loom.

Integrated Office 365 Suite - Microsoft Teams offers seamless integration with Office 365 apps allowing users to share files directly from Word, Excel, or PowerPoint.
In-built meeting schedules- Microsoft Teams has in-built meeting schedule options, allowing you to book and manage meetings directly from the software. This includes syncing with Outlook calendars, which isn't available in Loom.
Fully Featured Chat System - Unlike Loom, Microsoft Teams provides fully-featured chat functionality which includes conversations threads, @mentions, emojis, stickers and gifs, thereby encouraging more interactive communication.
Collaboration and Workflow Management - Microsoft Teams provides better collaboration and workflow management with features like task assignment, progress tracking, and integration with project management tools like Planner and Tasks.
Real-time Co-authoring and Document Collaboration- Microsoft Teams allows multiple users to work on a document simultaneously and see real-time changes. This makes it an ideal tool for team collaborations, something which isn't available in Loom.
Microsoft Teams does not offer video editing tools. Unlike Loom, Microsoft Teams does not offer built-in editing tools for videos, which means that users cannot trim, add text or call-outs, or make other modifications straight from the platform.
No asynchronous communication. Loom provides asynchronous communication which enables the users to record and share video messages to be viewed at a later time. This key feature is missing in Microsoft Teams, which largely focuses on synchronous, real-time communication.
Limited screen recording features. While both tools offer screen recording, Teams is more rudimentary without the options for recording a specific portion of the screen or adding annotations during the recording which Loom offers.
Teams is not as easy and quick to use for video messages. Loom is a platform designed for creating and sharing quick video messages; its entire user experience is designed around this. In Teams, creating a video message involves a few more steps as it's a collaboration tool rather than a video message software.
Limited video sharing options. With Microsoft Teams, you can mainly share videos within your organization or with specific teams or individuals. Loom, however, allows for more flexible sharing options, including generating a link that can be shared with anyone, even if they do not have a Loom account.

Pick #6 is a dynamic collaboration platform that facilitates virtual team meetings. Unlike – a primarily screen recording and video messaging software, Vowel incorporates real-time meetings and transcripts, meeting analytics, and post-meeting follow-ups, transforming them into searchable and shareable material alongside the feature of screen sharing. It is designed to capture, integrate, and streamline all communications making post-meeting follow-ups easy and efficient, whereas is more suitable for asynchronous communication and creating quick tutorial videos. While they have overlapping functionalities, their key features cater to divergent needs within the realm of virtual collaboration.

Integrated Meeting Platform: provides an integrated platform for arranging, conducting, recording and transcribing meetings, thus, unlike Loom, it offers an all-in-one solution without the need to use multiple platforms.
Real-time Collaboration: allows for real-time collaboration, allowing meeting participants to react, comment, and add notes. This promotes better engagement among users compared to Loom, which focuses on asynchronous video messaging.
Advanced Search: comes with advanced search capabilities which allow users to search through recorded meetings for key points, decisions, and tasks. This is something that is not readily available or as comprehensive on Loom.
Actionable Tasks: offers an integrated task assignment feature, where you can assign tasks to team members directly within the meeting notes. This ensures follow-ups are properly managed, a feature that may not be available on Loom.
Detailed Meeting Analytics: also offers detailed meeting analytics, allowing you to understand engagement, participation and meeting efficacy. While Loom may have video analytics, it does not have detailed analytics related to meeting performance.
Vowel primarily focuses on meeting transcriptions and collaborations, whereas Loom is more about personal video messages. Hence, if you seek a high-quality, personal video messaging alternative to Loom, Vowel may not be the best.
Vowel is designed as a synchronous communication tool and is not tailored for asynchronous communication, one of the key features that Loom provides.
Vowel does not offer features like screen recording or sharing pre-recorded videos, unlike Loom, limiting the scope for comprehensive video communication.
Direct or effortless video sharing options to different platforms, a notable feature in Loom, are not visibly prominent on Vowel.
The user experience on Vowel is more geared towards managing team meetings and collaborations while Loom offers a more streamlined workflow for personal communication, making the shift a bit challenging for businesses that rely heavily on video messaging.

Pick #7 is an alternative to as a screen recording software, providing unique features that represent innovative strides in the space of digital communication. Like Loom, Claap allows users to record their screen, voice, and video, thereby facilitating business collaborations, client interactions, and team communication. However, Claap stands out with its integration of scheduling capabilities allowing video calls to be booked directly in the app and then recorded, a feature not present in Loom. The platform also promises high-quality encrypted video storage and offers a sleek and intuitive user interface, making it a viable alternative to Loom for professionals seeking efficient, secure, and comprehensive screen recording and video communication solutions.

Real-Time Interaction - Clap offers the ability to have real-time video communication which is not available in Loom, making it suitable for meetings, Q&A sessions, or interactive demonstrations.
Scheduling Feature - Claap provides in-built scheduling capabilities. This allows users to plan and schedule meetings right inside the platform, which is a feature not intrinsic to Loom.
Automatic Video Editing - Claap has automatic video editing capabilities where it removes the awkward moments in the videos. Loom does not have such an automatic feature, which makes Claap more convenient for preparing polished video presentations.
Integrated Booking System - Claap offers an integrated booking and calendar system that works with Google Calendar. It enables users to manage their meetings and appointments in an organized way, which is not supported by Loom.
Seamless Sharing- While both platforms support video sharing, Claap offers a unique URL for every meeting. This enables users to easily distribute meeting recordings without having to deal with downloading and uploading files, such as the case with Loom.
Lack of advanced editing features - Unlike Loom, Claap does not offer advanced editing features. This lack of robust editing capabilities may limit the users in tweaking their videos to suit their specific needs or preferences.
No asynchronous communication feature - Loom provides users with a unique feature known as asynchronous communication where team members can communicate or respond to a message at their own convenient time. However, this feature is not available on Claap.
Limited integration - While Loom easily integrates with multiple platforms such as Slack, Gmail, and Asana, Claap currently only provides integration with Google Calendar. This puts limitations on collaborative work and efficiency.
Less user-friendly - The learning curve of Claap is significantly more substantial than Loom. New users might find Claap's user interface less intuitive in comparison to Loom's simple, easy-to-use interface, limiting the user experience.
No annotations during recording - In Loom, while recording a user can use the annotation tool to draw or mark important parts. This helps to emphasize key points in the video. Claap, however, does not provide this annotation feature while recording.

Pick #8, also known as Google Meet, is a robust video conferencing platform incorporated within the Google Workspace. While it primarily serves as a medium for online meetings or virtual conferences, it also offers a basic screen sharing feature allowing users to present their screen’s content live to the participants involved in the call. This feature can function as an alternative to a dedicated screen recording software like However, unlike Loom, Google Meet does not provide advanced screen recording features such as annotation, drawing tools, or detailed analytics. Regardless, Google Meet can be a sufficient alternative for users requiring simple screen sharing and recording during live meetings or presentations.

Native Integration with Google Workspace: Google Meet is part of Google's Workspace suite of productivity tools, which includes Gmail, Google Docs, Google Drive, and Calendar. If your organization uses these tools, Meet can integrate seamlessly, making managing meetings or sharing materials easier.
Larger Meetings: Google Meet allows for up to 250 participants per call in its premium version, compared to a maximum of 100 participants per video on Loom's business plan. This makes Google Meet a better option for larger teams or larger-scale meetings.
Live Streaming Capability: Google Meet offers a live streaming feature, allowing meetings to be broadcasted to up to 100,000 viewers within a domain. This can be particularly useful for large-scale events like company-wide meetings or webinars.
Real-time Captions: Google Meet offers a unique feature of real-time captions during meetings. Based on Google's voice recognition technology, this feature can be useful for ensuring clarity of communication, particularly in noisy environments or for individuals who have hearing impairments.
Interactive Whiteboard Feature: Google Meet integrates with Google Jamboard, Google's interactive whiteboard tool. This allows meeting participants to sketch and share ideas visually, in real time during the meeting. This can be a very useful tool for brainstorming sessions, planning meetings, or any other meeting where visual collaboration is useful.
Lack of asynchronous communication: Google Meet is designed for synchronous communication, i.e., real-time meetings. Loom, on the other hand, allows for asynchronous communication, i.e., recording lectures or messages to be viewed at any time. So, using Google Meet doesn't provide this flexibility.
Absence of video editing feature: In Loom, there are built-in video editing features, which include trimming, calls to action, and custom thumbnails. Google Meet does not have these features, so you'll require a separate video editing software to accomplish such tasks.
No video storage for later usage: Unlike Loom, which stores videos and provides a shareable link for future accesses, Google Meet is primarily intended for immediate, live meetings. Recorded meetings in Google Meet do get saved in Google Drive, but it's not as streamlined or straightforward as in Loom.
Inadequate privacy control for shared videos: While Loom provides the option to set privacy controls for shared videos, Google Meet doesn’t provide such controls. Anyone with the link can view the recorded meetings.
Limited engagement tools: Loom provides features like viewer reactions and comments on videos, which are not available in Google Meet. These tools can be valuable for presentations, lectures, or any scenario where viewer interaction would be beneficial.

Pick #9

Zoho Meetings

Zoho Meeting is a comprehensive online meeting and webinar solution that can be a solid alternative to the screen recording software, Loom. Unlike Loom, which primarily focuses on asynchronous video communication, Zoho includes live video conferencing, webinars, and screen sharing features, while also offering recording capabilities. The software allows you to host end-to-end encrypted video meetings, collaborate with team members in real-time, and record presentations for future reference. While it might not have as expansive screen recording features as Loom, Zoho Meeting encompasses a broader range of remote collaboration functionalities that could suit teams wanting an all-in-one solution.

Integrated Suite: Zoho Meeting is part of a larger suite of business applications offered by Zoho. This means it can easily integrate with other Zoho apps like Zoho CRM, Projects, Mail, and Docs, thereby streamlining data flow and communication. Loom doesn't offer this level of app integration.
Real-Time Interactivity: Unlike Loom, which focuses more on asynchronous communication via recorded videos, Zoho Meetings allows for real-time meetings and webinars. This feature facilitates live discussion and interaction, which can be crucial for certain business needs.
In-depth Analytics: Zoho Meeting offers comprehensive analytical reports for webinars. It provides insights about the attendees, engagement level, registrations etc., which can help in making data-driven business decisions. This sort of in-depth analytical report is not a central feature for Loom.
Polls and Q&A: Zoho Meeting includes built-in functionality for polls and Q&A during webinars which can be used for immediate feedback or audience engagement. While Loom is great for creating video content, it does not provide this type of interactive feature.
White Labeling: Zoho Meeting offers white labeling options where businesses can brand their meetings with their own logo and custom emails, providing a personalized feel to their meetings. Loom does not currently have a similar feature that allows for custom branding.
Zoho Meeting primarily focuses on meeting and webinar functionality rather than individual video recording or screen capturing which are the core features of Loom. This means if you are looking for a tool mainly for producing tutorials or quick explanation videos, Zoho might not be very effective.
Zoho lacks rich editing features. Unlike Loom, Zoho does not provide features like trimming video clips, adding text, or call-to-action that help you tailor your videos to be more engaging and informative.
Zoho Meeting does not have a feature to create shareable video links. Loom lets you share your video by simply sending a link which can be viewed in any web browser, making it a very convenient tool for fast and easy video sharing.
The usability of Zoho Meeting is geared more towards conference calls or webinars, thus it might not provide the same ease of use and intuitiveness for individuals creating and sharing short videos, which is the main function of Loom.
Zoho Meeting does not support offline video recording and saving videos on your local machine. In contrast, Loom allows users to save their videos offline which can be useful for people who want to keep their content even if they decide to stop using the platform.

Pick #10 is a highly responsive voice messaging and screen sharing platform that offers an alternative to other screen recording software like Unlike Loom, Yac provides asynchronous communication, letting its users send and receive voice messages, screen captures, or videos at their convenience. It also integrates with popular productivity tools enhancing collaboration within teams. Moreover, its focus on voice messaging reduces the time spent typing out long emails, making it a more efficient communication tool. While Loom excels in creating extensive screen-recorded videos, Yac offers a unique blend of screen recording and voice messaging for quick, effective communication.

Real-time communication - Yac aids in efficient team coordination by allowing immediate voice or video messages in real time, in comparison to Loom which focuses more on asynchronous communication.
Integrated toolset - Yac has a built-in screen annotation tool with arrows, pen tools, and shapes for more detailed communication during screen sharing, a feature absent in Loom.
Voice transcription - Yac offers a unique feature of automatic voice transcription for voice notes, helping users to quickly review messages without needing to listen to them again, a tool that’s not offered by Loom.
Searchable conversations - Yac enables users to search through voice, video, and text messages for specific information, a feature Loom does not have, making tracking and referencing past conversations easier.
Availability - Yac offers a desktop as well as a mobile app allowing for greater flexibility and accessibility to communicate and collaborate with teams from any device, which differs from Loom that only offers a desktop version.
Yac mainly focuses on asynchronous communication. While this can be seen as an advantage in certain circumstances, it also acts as a disadvantage when real-time communication is required. Loom, on the other hand, works well for both real-time and asynchronous communication, making Loom more versatile in this regard.
Yac does not offer the extensive screen recording and drawing tools that Loom provides. This could be a big downside for teams that rely heavily on visually-focused, recorded, in-the-moment feedback.
Yac's user interface is not as intuitive as that of Loom. For users who are not particularly tech-savvy, navigating and effectively utilizing Yac's features can initially feel complex unlike Loom which is accustomed to being user-friendly.
Yac doesn't provide as comprehensive analytics as Loom does. This could be a major setback for businesses and organizations that depend heavily on analytic data for their communications usefulness and performance.
Unlike Loom, Yac's video message length is limited to a shorter duration. This can hamper comprehensive explanations or instructions that require more time. In contrast, Loom offers lengthier recording durations, allowing for detailed communication when necessary.

Pick #11 is an online platform for video meetings and video collaboration, providing an alternative way to capture and share information as opposed to screen recording software like Although it doesn’t offer a direct recording function like Loom, Whereby allows real-time communication and screen sharing during meeting sessions, providing a space for interactive discussions, presentations, or trainings. The primary difference is that Loom is built for creating asynchronous content that can be shared and viewed anytime, while Whereby caters more to synchronous, live interactions. In terms of an alternative, Whereby provides a complementary approach rather than a direct substitute for screen recording.

Seamless Video Communication: Whereby provides a more interactive, real-time video conferencing service, allowing for more natural, seamless conversation and easier real-time collaboration compared to Loom, which specializes primarily in asynchronous video messaging.
Easy Room Creation and Management: In Whereby, you can easily create ‘rooms’ for different meetings and manage them, enabling smoother organization of multiple meetings or sessions. Loom, on the other hand, is centered around video recording and sharing, which isn't directly conducive to such functionalities.
No Need for Software Installation: As a browser-based solution, Whereby does not require any software installation or download, providing quicker access and immediate video meeting capabilities unlike Loom, which may need to be installed as a Chrome extension.
Embedded Tools for Enhanced Collaboration: Whereby integrates a variety of tools such as screen sharing, built-in chat, and recording, creating a comprehensive virtual collaboration platform. While Loom provides screen recording and comments section, it does not support real-time communication.
Unlimited Participants With Pro Plans: Unlike Loom’s focus on individual video recording, Whereby permits a larger number of participants in their Pro and Business plans, making it more suitable for larger team meetings and discussions.
Whereby is primarily designed for video conferencing, while Loom focuses on recording and sharing video messages. This fundamental difference means Whereby may not cater well to asynchronous communication, which can be a crucial aspect for teams working in different time zones.
Whereby lack certain features available in Loom, such as the ability to record screens, voice, and face simultaneously. It can limit the way information is shared and explained between team members.
Loom automatically provides a link to your video after recording, which makes sharing easy and immediate. Whereas, in Whereby, in order to share the meeting, one would need to record it separately and then upload the file somewhere to share the link which means extra steps are involved.
Whereby relies heavily on the strength of the internet connection for the real-time exchange of video, while Loom recordings can be done and uploaded without a stable or high-speed internet connection. Balance of video quality over weak internet connections can be a notable disadvantage for Whereby.
Loom allows you to edit your video after recording, offering functionalities like trimming the video, adding callout text, etc. However, with Whereby, since it is a conferencing tool, it doesn't offer any post-production editing tools.


Loom emerges as the go-to software solution for users seeking an intuitive platform to create, share, and manage video messages. Ideal for team communication, tutorials, and personalized feedback, Loom’s seamless integration with numerous work tools enhances productivity and fosters a more connected remote working environment. Its utility shines in scenarios where visual communication can significantly reduce the complexity of messages, making it perfect for professionals looking to convey detailed processes, provide clear project updates, or offer nuanced feedback that text alone can’t capture.

Conversely, seeking an alternative to Loom becomes pertinent when users require advanced video editing features, comprehensive live streaming capabilities, or when operating under stringent data security constraints. In contexts where the priority is broadcasting live sessions to large audiences, or when there’s a need for sophisticated post-production editing to deliver polished, cinematic-style videos, exploring other software options is advisable. Additionally, industries governed by strict compliance standards might find alternatives more accommodating, ensuring that their choice of communication tool aligns with both their operational needs and regulatory requirements.

Top 10: Best Loom Alternative