The 10 Best Gitbook Alternatives

The 10 best GitBook alternatives provide comprehensive documentation, collaboration features, and efficient content management systems, including platforms like Read The Docs, Sphinx, Confluence, Jekyll, and VuePress among others.

Gitbook alternatives are software platforms or tools that provide similar utilities as GitBook but might offer different features, functions, or pricing models. These options include Jekyll, Docusaurus, Read the Docs, and Sphinx, among others. They are typically used for writing and publishing content online, usually for documentation, eBooks, or other forms of writing that might benefit from a collaborative, version-controlled approach. Like GitBook, these alternatives usually come with Markdown support, various publishing options, collaboration tools, and sometimes even version control systems. The right choice among these alternatives depends primarily on the user’s specific needs and circumstances.

Why would you look for Gitbook Alternatives alternative?

While GitBook serves as a popular platform for documentation and collaborative writing, several factors might lead one to search for alternatives. Chief among these is the search for features that better align with specific project requirements or team workflows not adequately supported by GitBook. This could involve the need for more sophisticated collaboration tools, different publishing options, or integrations with other software that are not currently available or well-implemented in GitBook. The quest for a more customizable or user-friendly interface that can boost productivity without compromising on functionality is also a common motivator.

Moreover, pricing and support services can be pivotal reasons to consider other options. Teams with tight budgets might find GitBook’s pricing model beyond their financial reach or not the best value for their particular needs, prompting the search for a more cost-effective solution without sacrificing essential features. Additionally, access to responsive and helpful customer support can significantly enhance the user experience, especially in project-critical environments. If users feel that their feedback and support requests are not adequately addressed by GitBook, they might be inclined to explore other platforms that prioritize customer service and community engagement.

The Best Products

Gitbook Alternatives: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, an innovative cloud-based collaboration software for meeting notes, has been transforming the dynamics of team collaboration by reinventing the methods of capturing, organizing, and sharing meeting notes. With its real-time note-taking capabilities, collaborative editing features, and compatibility with well-known calendars and productivity tools, it serves as an invaluable asset for teams, regardless of their size.

One of the key hallmarks of ZipDo is its real-time note-taking capability, which ensures everyone remains aligned during meetings, effectively negating the requirement of traditional note passing. Following the meeting, team members are offered the convenience to modify and contribute to the notes for presenting the most recent updates.

When it comes to note organization, ZipDo is superlative, facilitating smooth categorization into diverse channels or folders. The efficiency is significantly amplified with its searchable notes, paving the way for quick retrieval of specific details, nullifying the need for time-consuming scrolling or manual searches.

ZipDo’s note-sharing function guarantees secure dissemination of information with team members, clients, or associates through its granular access control. The seamless integrations with various calendars further automate the process of collaborative note generation for each meeting, circumventing the necessity of manual entries.

In a nutshell, ZipDo stands out as an easy-to-use platform that provides a comprehensive suite of features aimed at enhancing team productivity, promoting collaboration, and simplifying project management. Through its real-time note-taking, collaborative editing, superior organization, easy retrieval, secure sharing, and practical integrations, ZipDo streamlines the process of managing meetings, thereby guaranteeing efficient progression of projects.

Pick #2


Confluence is a collaboration tool developed by the Australian software company Atlassian. As a GitBook alternative, it offers a powerful platform for teams to collaboratively create, organize, and discuss work, making it an excellent tool for project management and document collaboration. It comes with a robust text editor and a wide array of templates for creating comprehensive project documentation. Plus, it integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products like Jira and Trello, creating a functional ecosystem for streamlined project oversight. Its ability to handle extensive content, easy navigation, advanced search functionality, and options for user permissions set it apart as a robust GitBook replacement for larger teams or projects.

Comprehensive Integration Capabilities: Confluence seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira, Trello, Bamboo, Bitbucket, providing an efficient ecosystem for project management and collaboration which Gitbook lacks.
Team Collaboration and Feedback: Confluence allows real-time collaboration where multiple users can edit content simultaneously. It has robust commenting features, letting users comment at the page or even specific word level. Gitbook doesn't support real-time collaboration at the same level.
Detailed Versioning and Audit Trails: Confluence maintains an extensive version history of every page and provides a detailed audit trail of changes, which exceeds the versioning capabilities provided by Gitbook.
Advanced Customization: Confluence offers robust template and page layouts customization options, and the use of macros can significantly extend the functionalities of a page. Gitbook on the other hand provides less flexibility for customization.
Superior Knowledge Management: Confluence is vastly superior in creating a structured knowledge base with its capabilities to set page hierarchies, link related content, and tag/label pages for easy search and categorization. Gitbook has limited functionality in these aspects.
More Complex User Interface - Unlike GitBook, Confluence's interface can be quite complex, especially for new users. Learning how to use its multitude of features may require a significant amount of time, which can slow down the documentation process.
Limited Customization - Confluence lacks the flexibility of GitBook in terms of customization. While GitBook lets you easily adjust the look and feel of your documentation site, Confluence offers comparatively fewer options, which could limit the user satisfaction.
Real-Time Editing Challenges - While GitBook allows for real-time, collaborative editing, Confluence does not support the same seamless experience. This could lead to problems in collaboration and the ability to make quick changes.
Lack of export formats - Gitbook has the potential to export its files in several formats like PDF, ePUB, MOBI etc. But in case of Confluence, this ability to export in different formats is limited which could be a disadvantage.
Search Functionality - GitBook's search function is often reviewed as more powerful in comparison. While Confluence does provide a search tool, it is not as efficient or comprehensive as GitBook. This could make locating specific document details a bit more challenging.

Pick #3


Notion, as a GitBook alternative, is an all-in-one data management tool that provides robust solutions for task management, data storage, collaboration, and documentation. Unlike GitBook which primarily focuses on documentation, Notion provides a wide array of features like custom templates, advanced search, nested pages, to-dos, and more, all in one interface. These functionalities allow users to create, edit, manage, and share documentation, task lists, project plans, and other types of content with ease. Notion incorporates unique block-based structure that brings more flexibility, allowing users to embed all types of content in their digital workspace, making it a strong GitBook substitute.

Superior Organization and Collaboration - Notion allows you to organize your work into pages, databases and workspace which is a great option for collaborative efforts. It also supports the real-time co-editing of documents.
Extensive Integration Options - Notion integrates seamlessly with many other tools that a tech team might need including but not limited to Slack, Google Calendar, and Trello thereby offering more comprehensive and diversified functionality.
More Customizable - Notion pages are made up of modular 'blocks' which can be customized extensively, allowing you to tailor your workspace to exactly meet your needs, from text and images to more complex elements like databases and code snippets.
All-in-one Workspace - With Notion you can create a central hub for all your work by not only creating documentation but also manage tasks & projects, take notes & create spreadsheets, making it a more versatile tool than GitBook.
Offline Access - Notion provides the ability to access and edit your pages offline. This is crucial in scenarios where the internet might not be reliable or available and you need to continue working on your documentation.
Notion supports markdown formatting however it does not support a .md file format which is common for writing documentation in Gitbook. Transferring your content might be an issue if it is in .md format.
With Gitbook, there's a clear and easy-to-follow versioning system which is provided with the help of Git, but Notion lacks a robust version control system specifically for collaborative content creation which renders it less suitable for tracking changes over time.
Gitbook has a built-in search function, allowing for easy navigation through extensive content. Notion, despite offering a search function, may be less comprehensive in their text search and navigation in larger documents.
Notion does not provide a way to host public pages under custom domains, something that Gitbook allows for. This could be a disadvantage for companies or individuals wanting to use their own branding or domain for their documentation.
Gitbook integrates well with various other platforms like GitHub, Slack, Google Analytics. Notion provides a limited set of integrations compared to Gitbook which can be an issue if you want more seamless data sharing across different platforms in your workflow.

Pick #4

Read The Docs

Read The Docs is a reputable GitBook alternative where software documentation is hosted by developers. It provides an integrated authoring platform that aligns with modern software development workflows. Read The Docs integrates directly with your repositories in popular version controls like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, simplifying the process of managing updates. It automatically updates your documentation with every commit, reducing the time spent on synchronization. Additionally, it supports popular markup languages and reStructuredText with Sphinx, adding flexibility. It offers a built-in search tool allowing easy navigation through extensive software documentation.

Documentation Versioning: Read The Docs provides a strong support for versioning. This allows the documentation to evolve along with the product, and lets you keep track of changes or rollback if necessary.
Integration with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket: This makes the synchronization process almost seamless, allowing your documentation to automatically update with every code commit.
Public Hosting: Read The Docs offers free, public hosting for your documentation. This makes distribution and accessibility of your documentation easier and more immediate.
Availability of Search Feature: With an in-built search feature, it makes it convenient for users to search contents within the documentation, thereby enhancing the navigational user experience.
Supports Multiple Output Formats: Read The Docs supports a number of formats like PDF, HTML and ePub. This gives you the flexibility to provide your documentation in a format that suits your users' needs.
Limited Customization Options - Unlike Gitbook, Read The Docs offers limited customization options, which might restrict advanced users. In Gitbook, making design and layout changes to improve brand presence is relatively easy.
More Complex to Set Up - Read The Docs is complex to set up as compared to Gitbook. Specifically, linking to a repository, setting up webhooks and making configuration changes may require additional time and expert advice.
Dependency on reStructed or Markdown Files – Read The Docs is dependent on reStructuredText or Markdown files. So, users who prefer other documentation formats may find this tool challenging to use, while Gitbook supports more input formats.
Absence of In-Built Interactive Plugins - Gitbook provides a variety of in-built plugins that make the documents interactive and user-friendly. This feature is lacking in Read The Docs, making it less attractive for users looking for engaging content.
Less Collaborative Features - Gitbook fosters collaboration, making it easy for users to comment, suggest edits, and work together. Such collaborative features for writing and editing are not as robust in Read The Docs.

Pick #5


Docusaurus is an open-source tool and a noteworthy alternative to Gitbook due to its capacity for crafting high-performing, robust and seamlessly navigable documentation websites. Designed by Facebook, Docusaurus streamlines the process of maintaining and writing documentation, allowing the use of Markdown for writing new documents. Its real power comes from its React-based templating system that supports custom pages, enabling configuration to suit different projects. It also integrates with popular localization tools for translations, features versioning out of the box and offers support for various plugins, making it a highly customizable and efficient tool for developers needing complex documentation solutions beyond GitBook’s offerings.

Open Source: Unlike Gitbook, Docusaurus is an open-source solution. This means any developer with the necessary skills can help customize and improve the tool. Thus, it empowers developers to shape the tool to their specific needs.
Seamless Integration with React: Docusaurus comes with a built-in React-based environment, making it easier for developers who are familiar with React.js to customize and build on top of their documentation site.
i18n Support: Docusaurus supports internationalization out of the box. For organizations that require multi-language support, Docusaurus is an excellent Gitbook alternative.
Markdown Support: Docusaurus supports Markdown files natively. This enables teams to write their documentation collaboratively using simple text formatting.
Customization Flexibility: The flexibility offered by Docusaurus in terms of layouts, themes, styles, and configuration surpasses Gitbook. This allows for a high degree of customization to suit the specific needs of a particular project.
Docusaurus lacks WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editing which Gitbook supports. This means users need knowledge of Markdown to create and manage content efficiently.
Managing large documentation sets with Docusaurus can be challenging. Its sidebars and navigation are manually managed through configuration files. Gitbook, on the other hand, automatically handles fundamental navigation elements.
Gitbook provides pre-defined, customizable themes, allowing users to change the look and feel of their project effortlessly. Contrarily, Docusaurus requires knowledge of React for customization, limiting non-programmers from modifying the design.
Docusaurus does not offer an integrated platform for collaborative editing like Gitbook does, with features such as role-based editing, draft reviews, and version history are not available in Docusaurus.
Docusaurus does not support export to popular output formats like PDF or ePub out of the box, which is a feature provided by Gitbook. This feature is important when one needs to share or print documents or when offline readability is required.

Pick #6

Zoho Wiki

Zoho Wiki is a web-based application that allows businesses and individuals to create collaborative platforms for internal and external projects, making it a viable alternative to Gitbook. It facilitates knowledge sharing throughout an organization and offers a space for information management. Zoho Wiki is ideal for creating documents, notes, and directories in a structured format. It provides features like advanced search, user administration, customizable themes, and protection settings. Unlike Gitbook, Zoho Wiki supports a seamless integration with other Zoho applications, and therefore, is preferred by businesses that use Zoho Suite for their informational and collaborative needs.

Complete Customization - Zoho Wiki offers advanced customization options when compared to Gitbook. It allows you to adjust the layout, design, and color schemes of your pages to match your brand or project vision.
Integrated Suite of Tools - Zoho Wiki is a part of the Zoho suite of business apps, providing a complete workflow solution. This integration with other Zoho applications like Zoho Desk, Zoho CRM, Zoho Projects offers superior convenience and operational efficiency.
Multilevel Wikis - Zoho Wiki enables you to create multilevel, hierarchical wikis that are not only easy to navigate but also help in organizing content in a better and more structured format. This is an edge over Gitbook which primarily functions as a linear documentation tool.
Robust User Management - Zoho Wiki supports strong role-based access control. This allows you to define roles for team members, provide access permissions, and make sure every member sees only the content relevant to them.
Offline Access - Not all Gitbook alternatives provide the ability to access content offline, but this is not the case with Zoho Wiki. It offers the convenience to access and download the pages for offline viewing, ensuring constant easy availability of the data.
Zoho Wiki does not offer an integrated version control system that Gitbook provides, such as with Git. This lack of version control can be problematic for projects that require tracking changes or viewing historical revisions of a document.
Zoho Wiki's interface can be seen as less intuitive compared to Gitbook. Especially when it comes to organizing content, Gitbook's clear and easy-to-use interface design is superior.
Gitbook has a stronger community support and collaboration aspect compared to Zoho Wiki. Gitbook allows for seamless collaboration and co-editing of documents, while in Zoho Wiki collaboration might not be as fluid and user-friendly.
Zoho Wiki does not offer the same level of customizability as Gitbook. With Gitbook, one can change the layout and style of the page to better fit individual or project-specific needs, while such options are limited in Zoho Wiki.
Gitbook's migration and export options are more extensive compared to Zoho Wiki. With Gitbook, content can be exported in a variety of formats, including PDF, EPUB, MOBI, or as site files, which gives more flexibility to users in terms of how they choose to use and distribute their content.

Pick #7


VuePress is a static site generator developed by the same creator as Vue.js, and is an excellent alternative to Gitbook. Fundamentally based on Vue, VuePress is used to create static websites with Vue components in markdown format. VuePress contains a responsive default theme specifically geared for technical documentation, making it well-suited to the creation of documentation for software projects. VuePress generates pre-rendered static HTML for each page, which offers improved loading performance and is SEO-friendly. Custom themes with Vue.js components, hot-reload during development, and the ability to write custom plugins also enhance VuePress’ capabilities. It is stored on a Git repository, allowing it to leverage versioning and collaboration features from Git.

VuePress generates pre-rendered static HTML for each page, which results in better performance and search engine optimization compared to GitBook.
VuePress offers Hot-reloading out of the box. This feature makes it easier for developers to see their changes as they write, contributing to overall efficiency in the content creation and editing process.
VuePress provides first-class support for writing code in Vue, including the use of Vue components directly in your markup. While Gitbook has plugin support, it isn't as deeply integrated with a front-end framework like VuePress is with Vue.js.
The default theme of VuePress is also more appealing and modern-looking compared to GitBook's default theme. The layout is also more customizable and responsive.
VuePress makes use of Vue Router and Vue Server Renderer, which means you can easily create dynamic routes and pages. This is more complex to achieve in static site generators like GitBook.
Limited Templating Options: VuePress only offers a minimalistic default theme compared to GitBook which supports multiple templates. If you intend to design a complex and unique look, this becomes a limitation.
Dependency on Vue.js Knowledge: VuePress is built for Vue.js developers. If you're unfamiliar with Vue.js, you may face significant learning curves compared to GitBook, which has simpler syntax and does not require specialized programming skill.
Limited Plugin Ecosystem: GitBook has a decent amount of plugins to extend its functionality while VuePress has a lesser amount, which may limit customization option for someone transitioning from GitBook.
Lacks Collaborative Features: GitBook supports real-time collaboration which makes it a useful tool for teams, this feature lacks in VuePress, making collaborative writing difficult.
Lack of Hosted Solution: Unlike GitBook which offers cloud-hosted solution and hence don't have to worry about setup or maintenance, VuePress doesn’t have a hosted solution, and you need to handle the hosting and deployment yourself.

Pick #8

Adobe RoboHelp

Adobe RoboHelp is an industry-standard software for developing help systems, e-learning content, knowledge bases, and more. As a GitBook alternative, it offers a range of advanced features for designing and publishing digital documents and manuals. It allows users to deliver personalized content experiences with the help of AI-driven workflows. It supports HTML5 and PDF formats, with options for various layouts tailored for any device. RoboHelp enables content collaboration among teams through cloud-based capabilities, similar to GitBook, but extends these functionalities with robust version control, localization and translation support, and integration with Adobe’s suite of creative tools.

Multilingual and Globalization Support: Adobe RoboHelp goes beyond GitBook by offering Multilingual user interface and content support. This is particularly helpful for creating and distributing content to audiences across different regions worldwide.
Enriched Media Integration: Adobe RoboHelp allows embedding of a wide range of media such as 3D models, VR scenes, and PDFs into the content, going beyond the standard text-and-image format that is typical of some GitBook alternatives.
Personalized User Experience: Adobe RoboHelp allows content filtering in the output. This gives the ability to offer a personalized reading experience to the end user by hiding and displaying content based on user inputs.
Auto-Conversion of Legacy Content: Adobe RoboHelp has the ability to auto-convert legacy RoboHelp projects to the new 2019 format, something that is not available in GitBook and many of its alternatives.
Multi-Channel Publishing: Adobe RoboHelp allows users to publish their content across multiple channels including Mobile Apps, Epub, Responsive HTML5, PDF, and others from a single source, offering more comprehensive distribution options than GitBook.
Lack of Markdown Support - Unlike Gitbook, Adobe RoboHelp does not offer direct Markdown support. Users who prefer or are accustomed to working with Markdown documents may find this to be a significant drawback.
Limited Collaboration - Adobe RoboHelp does not offer the same level of collaboration that GitBook provides. While RoboHelp does allow for collaboration, it's far more restricted, especially compared to the real-time, multiple user collaboration facilitated by GitBook.
Steeper Learning Curve - Adobe RoboHelp has a more extensive feature set which can be an overkill for users who need simpler documentation tools, making the learning curve steeper as compared to GitBook.
Less Intuitive Interface - The interface of Adobe RoboHelp is not as intuitive and user-friendly as that of GitBook. This would mean new users may need more time to familiarize themselves with the interface before becoming fully productive.
Limited Mobile Accessibility - While Gitbook offers a better reading experience on mobile devices with its responsive design, RoboHelp lacks in this area, which might restrict access to documentation for users who rely on mobile devices.


GitBook is ideal for teams and organizations seeking a collaborative platform to create, manage, and share documentation and knowledge bases. Its strength lies in its simplicity and seamless integration with Git, making it perfect for software developers, technical writers, and project managers who are already familiar with version control systems. GitBook shines when there is a need for real-time collaboration, iteration on documents, and version tracking, ensuring that every team member is on the same page and contributing effectively to the project. Its user-friendly interface and support for Markdown also make it accessible to non-technical users, allowing for a broader range of contributors.

In scenarios where advanced customization, complex content management systems (CMS), or specific legacy integration capabilities are needed, an alternative software product might be a more appropriate choice. If your project demands extensive multimedia support, intricate security requirements, or highly customized workflows that go beyond GitBook’s straightforward editing and publishing processes, exploring other solutions might prove beneficial. These alternatives may offer more robust features tailored to niche professional needs or industry-specific documentation standards, which could be crucial for organizations with complex content organization or regulatory compliance concerns.

Popular Questions

What are some of the best GitBook alternatives?

Some of the highly recommended GitBook alternatives include Docusaurus, Read The Docs, VuePress, Sphinx, and MkDocs.

In what ways is Docusaurus better than GitBook?

Docusaurus provides an advantage in terms of its seamless integration with React.js, which allows developers to build and manage documentation for their web applications more effectively. It’s also open-source and highly customizable, unlike GitBook.

How does Read The Docs compare as a GitBook alternative?

Read The Docs is popular for its simplicity and ease of use. It allows documentation to be version-controlled and integrated directly with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. It’s also a free platform, unlike GitBook which charges for private documentation.

Why might one choose VuePress over GitBook?

VuePress is designed with a default theme optimized for technical documentation, and uses Markdown for writing content, providing simplicity and ease of use. VuePress websites are SEO-friendly and highly performance-optimized, making it an attractive alternative to GitBook.

Does Sphinx offer any distinct advantages over GitBook?

Yes, Sphinx is known for its robustness and extreme extensibility. It supports multiple output formats, including HTML, LaTeX (for printable PDF versions), ePub, Texinfo, manual pages, and plain text which offers more flexibility compared to GitBook. It also has a built-in search functionality.

Top 10: Best Gitbook Alternatives