Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Alternatives

Here are ten excellent alternatives to encompassing productivity and collaboration software solutions such as Asana, Trello,, ClickUp, Workboard, Zoho Sprints, Office365, Slack, Google Workspace, and Notion.

Learn more about our top picks for: Fellow Alternative

While offers comprehensive meeting management features, it might not suit everyone’s needs or preferences. Some users may seek alternatives because of affordability issues, as’s pricing may be above their budget. The software’s user interface, though simple, might not be easy to navigate for some. Other users might need specialized features not offered by, such as more in-depth analytics, advanced customizations, or integrations with specific tools, which may not be provided to the required degree. Additionally, since primarily focuses on enhancing teamwork, it might not be ideal for businesses looking for software catering more towards individual task management. So, based on affordability, specific feature requirements, or ease of use, someone might look for an alternative to

Why would you look for Fellow Alternative alternative?

In the fast-paced world of project management and team collaboration, finding the right software to streamline operations and enhance productivity is crucial. While Fellow has been a go-to option for many, the evolving needs of businesses and project teams can sometimes outpace its offerings. Organizations might seek alternatives due to a desire for more customizable features, improved user interfaces, or more robust integration capabilities with their existing tech stacks. As teams grow and projects become more complex, the limitations in scalability and adaptability of any single software, including Fellow, could prompt the search for a solution that better aligns with their dynamic requirements.

Moreover, cost-effectiveness is a significant factor when re-evaluating collaborative software options. Companies often strive to optimize their operational costs without compromising on the quality of tools available to their employees. In instances where Fellow might not provide the best value for its price or lacks flexibility in pricing plans suitable for different sizes of teams and businesses, decision-makers might be compelled to explore other avenues. An alternative software that offers a more favorable cost-to-benefit ratio, without sacrificing essential features, could lead to enhanced efficiency and satisfaction among team members, ensuring that every dollar spent on collaboration tools contributes to the overarching goal of business growth and success.

The Best Products

Fellow Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, a high-efficiency meeting management software, is set to redefine collaborative team dynamics with its esteemed ability for note-taking, classification, and distribution during meetings. The software’s real-time note-taking functionality enables teams, regardless of size, to merge their efforts seamlessly, reducing the hassle of passing around notes manually, and ensuring everyone maintains the same perspective throughout meetings.

A remarkable feature offered by ZipDo is its live note-taking capability. This function ensures everyone present in meetings remains updated, removing the necessity for a manual note exchange. After meetings, participants can conveniently amend or supplement the notes, guaranteeing the most current information circulation.

Excelling in the field of note arrangement, ZipDo facilitates such notes to be easily sorted into channels or directories. Search-facilitated notes improve expediency, facilitating speedy access to particular details without the need for lengthy scrolling or manual retrieval.

Highlighting the security aspect, ZipDo’s note allocation offers meticulous access control, endorsing the secure exchange of data with colleagues, clients, or partners. Its integration with calendars automates cooperative note development for each session, eradicates manual data entry.

To sum it up, ZipDo is an intuitive software offering a comprehensive suite of utilities that enhances team productivity, collaboration, and project administration. Its instantaneous note-taking, collective editing, orderly arrangement, searchability, secure sharing, and easy integrations render it an indispensable asset, streamlining meeting administration and ensuring effective project progression.

Pick #2 is a comprehensive meeting management software designed to facilitate effective collaboration and communication among teams. Unlike, takes a more extensive approach by not only focusing on meeting agendas and minutes but also integrates project and task management, team collaboration, and intelligent note-taking. It stores all essential data and notes for easier access and retrieval without having to deal with multiple platforms. also incorporates AI to automate meeting scheduling and follow-up tasks. Despite’s competency for delivering proficient meeting space solutions, is a robust alternative offering a more holistic solution for enterprise needs.

Centralized Repository: provides an excellent centralized hub to store all project details, meeting details, and other work-related data which is highly searchable, hence reducing the time to seek out important details.
Integration with Productivity Tools: provides integration with numerous productivity software like MS Teams, Google Calendar, Slack, and many others boosting team efficiency, which is something that might not be available equally in
Intelligent Meeting Features: offers purpose-built artificial intelligence tools for managing and optimizing meetings, which includes automatic generation of meeting minutes, assigning tasks within meetings, and tracking follow-ups.
Streamlined Project Management: has robust project management tools to track progress, deadlines, and deliverables across multiple projects, which provides a clear view of all ongoing tasks and the status of each.
Built-in CRM: comes with an inbuilt CRM feature which would enable businesses to manage customer relations better. This feature is not present in Fellow app, thus, making a better alternative for businesses needing CRM solutions. offers a comprehensive project management solution, however, it may not provide meeting-focused features as robust as, such as meeting templates, action items, and decision recording.
The interface of might be a bit less intuitive compared to, especially for users who are specifically looking for a streamlined and user-friendly meeting management solution. does not offer a feedback mechanism, which is one of the key features of Getting ongoing feedback can be important for continuous professional development and this feature allows users to request and give feedback directly.
Integration might be an issue for some users. integrates seamlessly with many tools like Asana, Slack, Jira etc., though it does offer integrations to an extent, it might not be as comprehensive as
The collaborative note-taking feature may not be as strong in, a feature that is well streamlined in, allowing everyone to contribute to the meeting's agenda and meeting notes in real-time.

Pick #3 is a comprehensive meeting management solution specifically designed for Microsoft Teams and Office 365 users. It’s an ideal alternative to, especially for businesses heavily invested in Microsoft’s ecosystem. While is known for its capability to aid in setting agendas, taking notes and assigning action items during meetings, offers similar features alongside unique integrations with Microsoft tools like Outlook, OneNote, and Teams. Its functionalities involve scheduling meetings, creating and sharing agendas, logging decisions, and setting tasks that synchronize with other Microsoft applications, providing an integrated approach to meeting management.

Full Integration with Microsoft tools: Decisions offers full integration with Microsoft tools, including Teams, OneNote, and Outlook. Users have the convenience of operating from a familiar ecosystem, ensuring a seamless workflow.
AI-Powered Meeting Assistance: Decisions has an AI-powered tool that provides suggestions for agenda items, helps identify tasks that need follow-up, and helps streamline the process of meeting planning and follow-up.
Disciplined Meeting Management: Decisions enforces structured and disciplined meetings by enabling organizers to design effective agendas, generate meeting templates, assign action items, and monitor progress against those action items, which might not be as robust in Fellow.
In-Meeting Tools: Decisions provides interactive and collaborative tools for real-time use during meetings. Participants can use features like live note-taking, voting, and priority setting to make meetings more productive.
Task Assigning and Tracking: With Decisions, users can assign tasks to individuals directly from the meeting minutes. The progress of these tasks can also be monitored, ensuring accountability and follow-through, which may provide more convenience and efficiency compared to Fellow's approach.
MeetingDecisions primarily focuses on enhancing the productivity of meetings, whereas is designed to streamline all aspects of team collaboration. Therefore, users switching from to MeetingDecisions might miss out on comprehensive management features. has an intuitive and sleek user interface that is user-friendly, while MeetingDecisions has a more traditional interface. Users might face a learning curve while adapting to MeetingDecisions. provides robust features for one-on-one meetings and individual task management. If a user is switching to MeetingDecisions, they might miss the personal task management and one-on-one meeting capabilities.
MeetingDecisions, as an alternative to, lacks the feature of integrating with other project management tools. This could lead to challenges in workflow continuity for teams that leverage multiple productivity tools.
While offers real-time collaborative note-taking, MeetingDecisions does not have this capability, which could cause a decrease in meeting productivity.

Pick #4 is a robust meeting management software solution that provides an alternative to platforms such as It is designed to facilitate better communication, increase transparency, and improve collaboration in team meetings. offers a range of features including collaborative agenda setting, shared meeting notes, and goal-tracking functionalities, among others. It empowers teams to set and follow up on action items to ensure meetings are productive and oriented towards achieving predetermined objectives. Like, it integrates with various other enterprise tools, but stands out due to its unique approach to context and actionability within meetings.

Comprehensive Focus on Aligned Goals: Hypercontext places a significant emphasis on aligning goals at every level of an organization. This approach ensures everyone is working towards the same objectives, unlike other platforms that may not have this integrated focus to the same degree.
Real-Time Updates: Hypercontext allows for real-time updates, an ideal feature for teams that need to make quick decisions and need the most up-to-date information. In contrast, with, it might require a refresh or delay in reflecting the changes.
Integrated Feedback: Hypercontext offers a unique feedback system where employees can give and receive responses within the same framework. This may lead to more effective communication and improvement, making it a potential range over other alternatives that might not provide this system as effectively.
Scalability: Hypercontext offers excellent scalability, which means it can grow and adapt with your business needs, providing greater convenience compared to other apps which may not mirror this aspect effectively.
Seamless Integrations: Hypercontext integrates seamlessly with other widely used software like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet, making it a considerable advantage for businesses that use these platforms. Some alternatives, like, may not offer the same range or ease of integrations.
Hypercontext emphasizes a lot on goal setting and tracking, rather than the comprehensive meeting management features provided by Users seeking advanced meeting orchestration may find it lacking.
The interface of Hypercontext may be a bit more complex and less intuitive compared to This could lead to a longer learning curve and frustration among users.
Hypercontext offers integration with fewer tools when compared to The lack of integration with tools like Asana, Outlook, and others may hinder efficient information flow and synchronization. offers strong capabilities in terms of shared meeting notes, action items, and agenda setting, which may surpass what's offered by Hypercontext, thus resulting in decreased productivity in meeting management.
Feedback and performance evaluation features seem to be more robust in, offering both private and public feedback options, along with a wide range of templates for reviews. Hypercontext does not seem to match up in this aspect, potentially affecting the appraisal process.

Pick #5

Lucid Meetings is an effective alternative to the Meeting Management Software found at It presents a comprehensive collaborative platform for conducting systematic and organized online meetings, as well as managing meeting-related tasks. It offers features like real-time meeting management, templates for meeting agendas and minutes, quick setup for regular meetings, and options for effective follow-ups. It provides strong support for decision-making and problem-solving within teams, thereby making it an excellent tool for businesses looking for streamlined meeting management solutions.

Comprehensive Meeting Management: Lucid Meetings offers a full suite of tools for planning, running, and following up on business meetings. This feature-rich environment can handle more than just simple note-taking and action item assignments that offers.
Meeting Templates: Lucid Meetings offers predefined meeting templates, including templates for common business meeting types like staff meetings, project updates, and decision-making sessions. This can make it easier and quicker to plan and prepare for meetings compared to
Visual Features: Lucid Meetings provides an integrated space for creating and sharing visuals, such as process charts or diagrams, right within the platform. This can enhance clarity and understanding in a way that is not directly supported on
Real-Time Agendas: Lucid Meetings allows users to collaboratively build an agenda in real time, during the meeting. This interactive feature can keep meetings more focused and productive compared to where the agenda is typically fixed beforehand.
Integration Variety: Lucid Meetings supports a wider variety of integrations with other business software compared to This can make it easier to fit into your current tech ecosystem, allowing for a smoother workflow and fewer disruptions.
Less User-friendly Interface - Compared to, LucidMeetings software has a less intuitive user interface which could lead to increased time getting acquainted with the platform.
Limited Integration Capabilities - integrates seamlessly with tools like Slack, Google Calendar, and Zapier, whereas LucidMeetings has fewer integration options which restricts its interoperability with other platforms.
Absence of Personal Notes Feature - With, users can prepare personal notes ahead of a meeting which is not possible with LucidMeetings, making it less advantageous for individual preparations.
Reduced Customization - LucidMeetings does not offer as much customization on the meeting layout and viewing options as does. This can make the presentation less tailored to personal or company preferences.
Absence of Real-time Collaboration - Unlike, which allows for simultaneous collaboration, feedback, and editing in documents, Lucid Meetings does not provide the same real-time collaboration feature which can slow down collaborative efforts.

Pick #6 is a comprehensive meeting management software, designed to offer an effective alternative to Beenote provides seamless tools to plan, conduct, and track meetings, facilitating collaboration and enhancing productivity. Its robust feature set includes task management, a detailed tracking system for decisions and actions, centralized document storage, and automated meeting minutes generation. Like, Beenote provides users with a single platform to organize, manage, and follow-up on their meetings, but differentiates itself with shared calendars, voting systems, and legal compliance tools that cater to companies’ unique needs.

Task Management Flexibility: Beenote offers a more comprehensive task management system compared to Fellow app. It allows users to assign tasks during meetings, set deadlines, track task progression, and even categorize tasks under various projects.
Superior Meeting Management: Beenote provides a more streamlined approach towards managing meetings. Apart from just scheduling, it also offers in-depth meeting agenda management, allows users to take notes, track meeting minutes and decisions.
Centralized Document Repository: Beenote supports a more robust document management system compared to Fellow. It allows you to store and manage all meeting documents in one centralized location, ensuring easier access and retrieval.
High Customizability: Beenote can be tailored to specific business needs, offering customizable templates for meetings and agendas. It's a feature that offers greater adaptability compared to Fellow app, especially for businesses with unique requirements.
Integration Capabilities: While both platforms offer integrations, Beenote provides a broader range of options, such as integration with Google and Outlook calendars, Slack, and even Director's Desk. This broad variety of integrations allows for better coordination and synchronization across different platforms.
Beenote focuses heavily on meeting management and note-taking, but it does not provide the streamlined agenda sharing and cooperative note-taking functionalities that does. This could potentially limit team collaboration in larger groups or more complex projects.
Beenote's user interface is not as intuitive or user-friendly as This could potentially complicate the user experience and cause confusion, especially for first-time users or those who are not as technologically savvy.
Unlike, Beenote does not offer advanced integration capabilities. While it can sync with Google calendar and Outlook, it lacks's comprehensive integrations with other tools like Slack, Asana, Jira, or Zapier. This might lead to disjointed workflows and inefficient processes.
Beenote does not offer real-time collaboration capabilities. In contrast, allows multiple team members to collaborate on the same agenda or note simultaneously. This lack of real-time collaboration in Beenote may impede adaptive and responsive team communication.
Beenote does not have the AI-powered insights and suggestions feature that offers. This feature can help team leaders identify communication or process inefficiencies and make improvements. Without this, Beenote users may find it more challenging to assess and enhance their productivity.

Pick #7

MeetingBooster is a dedicated meeting management platform designed to make corporate meeting procedures, from planning to execution, more efficient and productive. As an alternative to, it offers a variety of specific features to streamline meeting processes, including professional minute taking, fully customizable agenda templates, and task assignment tracking. It promotes actionable meetings with time tracking for agenda items and allows participants to review and update meeting minutes in real time. Unique decision-making tools, including voting and risk assessment, help drive strategic choices. While both platforms offer robust meeting management features, MeetingBooster’s detailed approach may suit corporations seeking a high degree of control over their meeting workflows.

Dedicated Meeting Management: MeetingBooster specializes in managing meetings from start to finish. It offers comprehensive preparation, execution, and follow-up features such as sending invites, agenda creation, distributing minutes, assigning action items, and tracking progress which offers a more detailed functionality in comparison to
Task Follow-Up: MeetingBooster provides automatic meeting minutes with tasks and decisions, and sends them to all attendees. Each task is traceable, enabling supervisors to follow up on the completion status, which is less proactive in
Enhanced Collaborative Abilities: MeetingBooster facilitates real-time collaboration among team members, providing tools that allow participants to simultaneously review and amend meeting-related documents, furthering group dynamics, which is not as strong in
Profound Integration Options: MeetingBooster offers extensive integration with MS Outlook/Exchange, providing seamless scheduling, task allocation, and tracking. While also supports integration with various software, MeetingBooster's deep integration with MS Outlook/Exchange can be highly beneficial for companies heavily relying on Microsoft's productivity suite.
Meeting Analytics: MeetingBooster offers analytics and reports to understand and improve productivity in meetings. It helps identifying meeting trends, participant engagement, and the ratio of time spent in meetings versus tasks accomplished. While provides feedback and note-taking features, it does not focus as much on the analytic side of meetings.
Lack of Real Time Collaboration - MeetingBooster doesn't support real-time collaboration in the same way that Fellow does, it's more of a static tool, which can slow down the momentum during a meeting and cause delays in decision-making processes.
Limited Integration Options - Unlike Fellow which supports a wide array of integrations and tools, MeetingBooster has limited integration options. This makes it less flexible to adapt to different workflows that a team may already have in place.
No Option for Personalized Feedback - While Fellow offers a feature to deliver 1-on-1 feedback that can help improve team dynamics, MeetingBooster doesn't provide this similar feature. This could limit the opportunity for employee development.
Less Intuitive Interface - MeetingBooster may be seen as having a more complex user interface compared to Fellow, which can make it less user-friendly especially for those not used to using meeting management software.
Lack of Direct Messaging - Fellow app has features like direct messaging, which allows for more communication between team members. MeetingBooster lacks this feature which may lead to an increase in email or other form of communication outside of the tool.

Pick #8

MeetingKing is a digital platform designed to streamline the process of organizing, managing, and efficiently conducting meetings. Comparable to, it offers several tools geared towards these goals, such as agenda creation, task management, and integrated note-taking. While it may not offer the one-on-one meeting features or feedback options that are available on, MeetingKing does provide the convenience of automatic minutes generation, decision tracking, and meeting follow-ups. In this sense, it can be viewed as simpler, more focused alternative within the realm of meeting management software.

Integrated Task Management - MeetingKing offers comprehensive integrated task management features. This tool takes care of task creation, tracking, and assignment, offering more functionality compared to
Meeting Minutes Functionality - As a alternative, MeetingKing excels with its meeting minutes feature. It creates comprehensive minutes during the meeting and allows these minutes to be shared with all participants right after the meeting.
Automatic Agenda Creation - MeetingKing has a feature that allows it to automatically create an agenda for subsequent meetings based on the unfinished tasks from the previous meetings. This can be a useful feature compared to
Email Interactivity - MeetingKing allows you to create tasks, decisions, and comments directly from email without having to log into the system. This specific feature can enhance user convenience compared to
Independent Functionality - While integrates with other platforms like Slack and Asana for full functionality, MeetingKing provides independent and full-functionality meeting management, meaning you don't have to switch between different apps.
MeetingKing lacks some of the advanced meeting management features that Fellow provides specific to ongoing duty lists and action item tracking, which supports more comprehensive meeting organization.
MeetingKing does not offer integration with the full suite of commonly used collaboration tools like Jira, Slack, Asana, or Trello. While it does integrate with Outlook and Google Calendar, the lack of extensive integration could impact productivity.
The user interface of MeetingKing is outdated compared to Fellow. This may reduce user engagement and user experience, particularly for those familiar with more modern interfaces.
MeetingKing does not have an inbuilt one-on-one facilitation feature, which is a major part of This means you'd lack that continuous feedback loop that is geared towards personal growth and development in Fellow.
The customizable agenda templates and collaborative note-taking capabilities in are more advanced than those available in MeetingKing. This could mean less efficient and productive meetings due to the lack of these powerful collaborative features.

Pick #9 is an online platform designed to organize and streamline the end-to-end meeting management process, jeopardizing the need for traditional Meeting Management Software like It automate minutes, allows users to attach agendas and files, schedules recurring meetings, and tracks actionable items. The unique selling point perception of this software is its focus on converting the minutes of the meeting into predefined tasks. With its ability to integrate seamlessly various platforms and its emphasis on tracking the progress of assigned tasks from meeting discussions, it addresses crucial gaps that may occur post-meetings, challenging the traditional offerings of applications like

Service Integration - Magic Minutes offers robust integration with existing software like Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. This allows users to seamlessly transfer data and manage their workflow within the tools they are familiar with.
Meeting Preparation - Magic Minutes provides a beneficial feature that can help users preset agendas, assign tasks before the meeting, and even set the allotment of time for each point. This ensures that every meeting is organized and use of time is maximized.
Minute Management - Magic Minutes has a comprehensive approach to manage minutes of a meeting. The software can automatically write meeting minutes and is tailored to capture decisions, actions, and notes, which saves time in note-taking and promotes clarity and accountability.
Action Follow-Up - With Magic Minutes, actions arising from meetings can be tracked and dealt with individually. This tool sends following reminders to people responsible for tasks, keeping everything under control and promoting efficiency.
Document Storage - Magic Minutes provides a centralised storage system. This makes for easy accessibility and organisation of meeting minutes, agendas, and documents related to the meeting.
Unlike, Magic Minutes does not offer standalone native applications for easier access on various platforms. Without this, users are dependent on browser-based access, which can be less practical for some use cases.
Magic Minutes lacks the extensive integration capabilities offered by features seamless integrations with tools like Slack, Zoom, Google Calendar, Outlook, and more. However, Magic Minutes does not support as wide a range of integrations, which can affect workflow efficiency.
Magic Minutes does largely focus on meeting minutes, with a less comprehensive approach to meeting management compared to what is offered by The latter goes beyond meeting minutes to also address action items, collaborative agendas, and feedback, giving it a broader scope of functionality.
Sharing and collaboration seem less intuitive on Magic Minutes. offers a more open format for input from all team members and allows anyone to contribute to the meeting agenda, making it more dynamic and action-oriented than Magic Minutes.
Magic Minutes does not appear to provide functionality for personal note-taking and private streams of thought during meetings, a feature offered by This feature is particularly helpful for individual users to jot down thoughts or ideas during meetings without them being publicly viewable.

Pick #10

Agreedo is an efficient meeting management software solution that provides a secure platform to create meeting agendas, share them with participants, document minutes and track the progress of tasks assigned during meetings. Similar to, Agreedo allows users to collaborate online during meetings, however, it separates itself by focusing more on the pre and post-meeting processes such as agenda setting and minutes dissemination. Users can categorize actions and decisions made during meetings and can also assign tasks to team members. Although it lacks some of the AI-powered features found in, Agreedo is a substantial alternative for businesses looking for a streamlined, user-friendly meeting management tool.

Meeting Structure Flexibility: Agreedo comes with the ability to structure meetings in a way that fits specific needs. This includes tasks, decisions, and topics. This is something that is not as flexible in
Post-Meeting Follow-ups: Agreedo provides a feature for automatic post-meeting follow-ups, including minutes, responsibilities, tasks and decisions. These features are more comprehensive as compared to the features of
Collaboration Features: Agreedo promotes efficient team collaboration with extensive capabilities for sharing meeting agendas, allowing real-time collaboration, and enabling everyone to participate in the preparation of the meeting. Though also offers collaboration features, Agreedo's real-time agenda co-creation is more inclusive.
Integrations: Agreedo offers convenient integrations with platforms such as Microsoft Outlook, Google Calendar, and Lotus Notes. This potentially allows for a smoother incorporation into existing workflows compared to
PublicMeeting Support: Agreedo supports public meetings, providing easy access to public online meetings which can be available to anyone with the link. This feature may not be available or as easily accessible with
Limitation in collaboration tools - As compared to, Agreedo has comparatively lesser collaboration tools, which might be a disadvantage in scenarios that need highly interactive and collaborative workflows.
Lack of Personal Streams - has a feature where you can manage your tasks, feedback, and notes in one place called 'personal streams'. However, Agreedo lacks this feature, which can be a disadvantage for individual contributors working on a project.
No AI features - Unlike, which offers AI features like conversation intelligence to aid users in identifying key insights from meetings, Agreedo does not offer AI-powered features. This lack may limit the user's capacity to get in-depth insights from their meetings.
Absence of a 1:1 meeting feature - has a unique 1:1 meeting feature, which encourages personal interaction between team members. In contrast, Agreedo does not possess such a feature, which could hamper the relationship development between team members in a company.
User Interface - Agreedo has a more traditional user interface, which may not be as pleasing or easy to navigate as the more intuitive and user-friendly interface offered by This could slow down efficiency and user satisfaction.


Fellow software shines in scenarios that demand streamlined meeting management, effective team collaboration, and centralized feedback collection within an organization. It’s ideal for teams looking for a comprehensive solution to enhance their productivity and communication during meetings, track action items, and foster a culture of continuous improvement through actionable feedback. This platform is particularly well-suited for managers and team leaders seeking to bolster team engagement, maintain clear records of discussions, and ensure accountability in task execution, making it a go-to choice for optimizing the workflow of collaborative projects.

On the other hand, considering an alternative software product makes sense when specific features or customization options are a priority that Fellow may not fully support. For instance, businesses needing advanced project management capabilities, such as detailed Gantt charts, in-depth resource allocation, or industry-specific functionalities, may find more specialized software more aligned with their requirements. Additionally, smaller teams or startups operating on a tight budget might look towards alternatives offering more cost-effective solutions or a different set of tools that cater more closely to their unique operational needs, ensuring they aren’t paying for extensive features they’ll rarely use.

Top 10: Best Fellow Alternative