Yes, we all have too many let's at least stay organized! → Discover ZipDo

The 10 Best Equal Time Alternatives

Explore a wide range of equal time alternatives, offering distinct features and functionalities, suited to different user needs and organizational demands, to maximize operational efficiency and productivity.

Learn more about our top picks for: Equaltime Alternative

Although offers a comprehensive platform for meeting engagement, including agenda drafting, structured discussion, and role assignments, individuals or organizations might seek alternatives for various reasons. These could include the need for additional functionality, such as video conferencing capabilities, task assignment and tracking, or integration with other productivity tools. They may also desire a personalized meeting experience tailored to their specific industry or business model. Affordability could also be a factor, as they might be looking for a tool with a lower price point or a more flexible payment structure. Furthermore, if users experience service issues or technical difficulties with, they may seek a more reliable or user-friendly alternative.

Why would you look for Equaltime Alternative alternative?

In today’s fast-paced world, the quest for efficiency and productivity leads many to seek the best tools available – tools that align perfectly with their unique workflow and objectives. While EqualTime has served as a reliable companion for scheduling and managing time across various teams and projects, individuals and organizations alike may find themselves in search of alternatives. This could be driven by a desire for simpler interfaces, more customized features, or compatibility with a broader range of third-party applications. The pursuit of a perfect fit is not just about meeting current needs but anticipating future demands as technology and team dynamics evolve.

Moreover, budget constraints often play a crucial role in decision-making processes. As businesses grow and their needs become more complex, the cost-effectiveness of software solutions comes under scrutiny. An alternative to EqualTime might offer more competitive pricing plans or a more appealing cost-benefit ratio, especially for startups and small businesses looking to maximize their resources. Additionally, customer support and community engagement can vary significantly between different software providers. A platform with a proactive support team and a vibrant community can enhance user experience, driving the search for an alternative that promises not just functionality but a comprehensive support ecosystem.

The Best Products

Equaltime Alternative: Our Recommendations

Pick #1: Our Software


ZipDo, a cloud-based board management software, radically enhances board collaboration by reinventing the approach to recording, structuring, and disseminating meeting notes. Its real-time note-taking, collective alterations, and compatibility with popular calendars and productivity apps make it a necessity for boards of all proportions.

One distinguishing characteristic of ZipDo is its live note-taking capability, ensuring every board member remains on-track during meetings, hence eliminating the hassle of traditional note circulation. Following the meeting, board members can comfortably modify and complement the notes to maintain current information.

ZipDo excels at note categorization, offering an easy-to-use system for sorting notes into channels or folders. Searchable notes boost efficiency by enabling swift access to targeted information without the inconvenience of extensive scrolling or manual searches.

In terms of security, ZipDo’s note sharing functionality employs stringent access control, safeguarding information sharing amongst trustees, external stakeholders, or key partners. Its seamless integration with calendars promotes the automated creation of collaborative notes for each board meeting, thereby doing away with manual data entry.

In summary, ZipDo presents a user-friendly platform that comes fully loaded with all-compassing features to augment board productivity, collaboration, and governance. Its real-time note-taking, collective editing, organization, search functionality, secure sharing, and seamless integration capabilities make it an indispensable tool. This software simplifies board meeting management, guaranteeing the smooth execution of strategic goals and plans.

Pick #2

Parabol is an open-source remote work tool that is an alternative to the meeting engagement software It offers an interactive and efficient approach to managing retrospectives, check-ins, and sprint planning, helping agile teams optimize their workflow and enhance collaboration. Parabol provides real-time updates, multi-user grouping, task distribution, and timeline tracking to ensure effective team coordination and project progression. Unlike that primarily focuses on meeting equalization, Parabol is more comprehensive, providing a broader project management solution, making it a suitable alternative depending on the specific requirements of your team or project.

Agile Methodology Support: Parabol supports agile methodologies like scrum and kanban, which could benefit teams that are following these approaches in their project management and planning.
Built-in Retrospectives: Parabol comes with a built-in mechanism for conducting retrospectives, a key aspect of agile methodology. This feature is lacking on and could be valuable for teams wanting to continuously assess and improve their workflow and collaboration.
Seamless Integration: Parabol easily integrates with other frequently used tools such as Slack, GitHub, and Jira, enhancing the workflow by providing a more integrated and centralized platform, which might be more comprehensive than
Task and Sprint Planning: Parabol comes with efficient tools for task planning and sprint layout. Its interface is designed to facilitate easy item arrangement, visual sprint overviews, and task prioritization, which can be a competitive advantage over
Transparency and Team Involvement: Parabol offers features like shared team board and tasks assignment which increase transparency across team members leading to improved involvement and collaboration. This can be a beneficial addition in comparison to the features covered by
Less User-Friendly - Compared to, can be less user-friendly for non-tech-oriented individuals. It can be difficult to navigate, especially for those not familiar with task management tools.
Limited Task Management Functions - is more known for its agile meeting features, and while it has task management functions too, its features are less in-depth compared to which is dedicated to task management and time tracking.
Limited Templates - has a limited variety of templates for project management. Unlike, Parabol might not satisfy diverse project management needs.
No Timesheet Submission Function - lacks the ability to submit timesheets, something that provides. This may be a vital feature for some organizations and teams for tracking and managing tasks and scheduling.
Lack of Direct Integration with Other Tools - may not directly integrate with some tools that are often used in task management like Google Calendar or Office 365. This can cause an extra step for those needing to use more than one tool and can hinder productivity. It might not match the seamless integration provided by

Pick #3

GoRetro is a powerful online platform designed for agile teams to conduct seamless retrospective meetings. Unlike, which focuses largely on structuring meetings and employee engagement, offers a specialized solution for sprint retrospectives. It enables teams to efficiently discuss what went well, what didn’t, and propose solutions to improve future sprints. The platform provides a variety of templates, facilitates anonymous feedback, offers real-time team collaboration, and tracks team health over time. Its easy-to-use interface encourages participation and keeps the focus on constructive feedback and continued learning and improvement.

Comprehensive Analytics - offers detailed retrospectives and analytics, enabling teams to get more in-depth insights into their performance for continuous improvements. This could be seen as more detailed than what offers.
User-Interface Customization - provides options for customization of the platform interface according to the visual preference of the team. This degree of personalization might not be seen in
Seamless Integration - integrates flawlessly with widely used project management tools, which may give it a more streamlined cross-software experience compared to
Efficient Feedback Cycles - implements thorough and efficient feedback cycles that foster team coordination and agility, which might allow for quicker action compared to
Actionable Outcome Oriented - provides a feature where actions can be directly linked to a retrospective outcome, promoting follow through on team improvement plans. There may be some limitations in this aspect within leans heavily toward traditional Agile and Scrum methodologies. For teams or users following other project management methodologies (Kanban, Lean, etc.) or a mix, provides more flexibility.
GoRetro.AI is primarily focused on retrospective meeting alignment, which can be limiting if users need a solution for all-round team collaboration across various meeting types., on the other hand, allows for a range of meeting formats, not just retrospectives. provides a unique feature of meeting minutes tracking, which lacks. This allows for efficient documentation and follow-ups of meetings on the platform. was designed specifically to manage retrospectives within Agile teams, meaning it may not cater effectively for all the requirements of differently structured teams or organizations., on the other hand, is not specific to Agile and can cater to a broader range of team structures and requirements.
Despite having a clean user interface, may require a learning curve for users who aren't familiar with Agile or Scrum methodologies. The interface and usage of can be more intuitive for teams or individuals regardless of their familiarity with specific methodologies.

Pick #4

Mentimeter is a web-based tool that provides an interactive and dynamic platform for conducting presentations, meetings, classes, and other group activities. It serves as an alternative to Meeting Engagement Software such as in several ways. While focuses on effective use of meeting time by balancing inputs and ensuring shared time during meetings, allows real-time interactivity for presentations and meetings through features such as polls, quizzes, Q&A sessions, and real-time voting. This enables meaningful engagement, instant feedback, and fosters an interactive and collaborative environment. strives to make meetings and presentations more engaging and inclusive, which aligns with the core principle of

Improved audience interaction: Mentimeter can incorporate live voting and polling, which can lead to higher levels of engagement from your audience compared to
Variety of presentation tools: Mentimeter provides various formats like multiple-choice questions, scales, word clouds, matrices, quizzes, and more. This flexibility allows for more comprehensive feedback and engagement strategies compared to
Offline Presentation Support: Mentimeter offers the feature to download presentations for offline use, a benefit not common with all online polling tools such as
Embedded functionality: Mentimeter presentations can be embedded into a website or shared via a link, which can result in greater accessibility and ease of use for both presenters and attendees compared to
Real-time data visualization: Mentimeter offers dynamic and live updating of audience responses in the form of colorful and interactive charts and graphs. This makes data interpretation quicker, easier, and more engaging than the feedback methods on
Lack of Equal Speaking Time Allocation - Unlike that emphasizes on equal speaking time per participant, Mentimeter does not have a feature to equally distribute speaking time among all participants. This feature can be crucial in facilitating fair and equal discussions.
Less Focus on Discussion - Mentimeter specializes in creating live polls, quizzes, and feedback systems rather than focusing on the actual organization and intuitive visualization of discussions, which is where excels.
Less Transparency - While provides an open and transparent platform where event organizers can share the event's data and insight, Mentimeter lacks this transparency, which might not promote trust among participants.
Limited Customization Options - offers a robust and adaptive interface that can be tailored to various types of discussions and meetings. Mentimeter, on the other hand, provides more standard, less flexible layouts.
Reliance on Real-Time Participation - Mentimeter's interactivity is based heavily on real-time participation. Unlike, where users can participate asynchronously, those unable to attend the event at the set time might miss out on participating in Mentimeter's polls or quizzes.

Pick #5

Team Retro is an online retrospective meeting tool designed to facilitate effective team collaboration and feedback after project sprints. As an alternative to the Meeting Engagement Software, TeamRetro offers similar engagement and meeting efficiency features, but focuses more on Agile and Scrum methodologies used by software development teams. It helps teams to identify what went well and what needs improvement in their last sprint, promoting continuous learning and improvement. The platform offers a collaborative, real-time environment where team members can anonymously share thoughts, vote on topics, and agree on actions for future sprints.

Pre-Made Templates: TeamRetro offers pre-made templates that allow for easier setting up and conducting of retrospective activities. This can lead to more efficient and focused discussions, compared to which doesn't offer such a feature.
Detailed Analytics: TeamRetro provides detailed analytics post-retrospective that can help the team understand areas that need improvement and track progress over time. This level of data analysis isn't available with
Integration with Other Platform: TeamRetro supports integration with various other work platforms such as Slack, JIRA and Trello. This enables smoother workflows and data sharing between different systems, keeping all the team’s information in one place. This is a feature that is not available in
Supports Multiple Languages: TeamRetro supports multilingual retrospectives, which can be beneficial for teams that are globally spread out and function in different languages, this feature is not available with
Advanced Moderation Features: TeamRetro comes with advanced moderation features such as private feedback, giving a higher level of control of feedback and discussion to the meeting leader than requires an initial setup for every retrospective, which can be cumbersome for teams with frequent retrospectives compared to has limited flexibility in terms of customization. This could limit the ability to adjust the platform to fit specific team preferences compared to the more adaptable uses a kanban-style board for listing ideas, which may not be preferred by all teams as opposed to own unique style by
Unlike Equal Time, does not offer real-time collaborative features such as shared note-taking or live-editing, which can limit communication and convenience for dispersed teams. does not support video conferencing within the platform, a feature that could be crucial for remote teams and is available in

Pick #6

EasyRetro, also known as FunRetro, is a digital retrospective board tool designed to enhance team collaboration and productivity. As an alternative to meeting engagement software like, EasyRetro offers teams a visually engaging platform for brainstorming, discussing project status updates, and offering feedback. It supports different retrospective techniques with features that include creating customizable retrospective boards, adding and voting on cards, and discussion facilitation. While focuses on ensuring balanced participation during meetings, provides a more comprehensive view on team collaboration with the added advantages of being user-friendly and fostering continuous improvement. supports real time collaboration, meaning teams can conduct their retrospectives together irrespective of their geographical location. This feature may not be as efficient in
With, users can create and customize their own boards to suit their team and project requirements, offering a level of customization that may not be available on
In, actions from the previous retrospectives are clearly visible in the next retrospectives, making it easier to follow up on actions and promises made in the past. This direct and built-in follow-through feature might be lacking in has a user-friendly interface that makes it simple and intuitive to use. This feature is particularly beneficial to teams that are new to retrospectives and may not be as streamlined in offers a fun and interactive platform with elements like GIFS, stickers, and emojis that can be used to make the retro sessions more engaging. This level of engagement might not be as pronounced in
Unlike, EasyRetro does not have a feature to systematically and fair distribute speaking time among team members. This could lead to discussions being dominated by a few individuals, instead of allowing everyone to have an equal say.
EasyRetro's main focus is on retrospectives, which limits its functionality when used as a general meeting tool. Unlike, it doesn't facilitate other types of meetings such as planning and brainstorming, which makes it less versatile.
In comparison to, which is designed around promoting equality in meetings with practical features such as the "equally distributed time" feature, EasyRetro lacks specific features designed to promote a balanced and inclusive discussion.
EasyRetro lacks the structured meeting planning and preparation tools that provides. The absence of these tools may result in unstructured and less productive meetings.
EasyRetro's interface and user experience might not be as intuitive for non-technical users when compared to, limiting its accessibility for people from different backgrounds or levels of technical comfortability.

Pick #7

Sessionlab is an online platform designed to assist professionals in creating and managing workshops, meetings, and training sessions with a strong focus on collaboration and user-friendly features. It provides a library of facilitation techniques and resources, and the ability to design interactive, well-structured agendas. Unlike, which primarily focuses on equal engagement and encourages participation from attendees by tracking airtime and providing visual cues, SessionLab places more emphasis on the planning and design process of meetings and workshops. They both serve to enhance meetings but approach it from a slightly different perspective.

SessionLab offers a more advanced and intuitive workshop planning tool, making it easier to design and manage your sessions. This feature offers timeline visualization for your workshop, making it simple to manage the flow of your activities.
In SessionLab, you can access a large library of facilitation techniques and methods. This extensive resource database can be incredibly useful for enhancing your sessions in a more structured and professional manner.
SessionLab has a feature of real-time collaboration, which allows multiple members of a team to work on the same workshop plan simultaneously. This is particularly useful for larger teams or projects where multiple inputs are needed.
In contrast to Equaltime, SessionLab provides an off-line mode, which allows you to continue your work even without internet connection, enhancing usability in locations where internet may be unreliable.
SessionLab allows for seamless integration with other tools such as Google Calendar, Outlook, iCal, which offers added convenience for syncing your sessions across various platforms.
Unlike, SessionLab does not offer real-time tracking of an individual's speaking time during a meeting. This limits its functionality for precise time management.
SessionLab is primarily designed to help design meetings and workshop agenda, it doesn't have the focus on promoting balance in meeting participation like which could be essential for certain users.
SessionLab lacks the straightforward simplicity of The more complex user interface could be daunting for less tech-savvy users who simply want to ensure equal speaking time.
SessionLab does not have an integrated AI moderator like, hence it may not be as efficient in facilitating and managing group discussions. provides capability to analyze speaking patterns and habits over multiple sessions, a feature that SessionLab lacks. This could be a hurdle for organizations looking to improve their communication and meeting models over time.

Pick #8

Slido is a technology platform that enhances communication and increases engagement in meetings, events, and conferences. As an alternative to the meeting engagement software, offers a suite of interactive features such as live Q&As, polls, surveys, and quizzes which empower users to voice their questions and opinions. It supports real-time, virtual, and hybrid event modes and integrates effortlessly with widely-used platforms like Zoom and PowerPoint, promoting seamless collaboration. While both tools aim to enhance engagement and improve efficiency in meetings, choosing between them would depend on specific organizational needs, integration preferences, and the type of engagement they wish to promote.

Real-Time Engagement: facilitates live interaction with the audience through live polls and Q&A sessions. This interactive approach allows users to actively participate, thus boosting engagement and generating actionable insights.
Easy Integration: integrates seamlessly with webinar and video conferencing tools such as Microsoft Teams, Zoom and Google Slides making it a compatible and versatile tool for any online presentation, meeting, or event.
Event Analytics: Unlike, provides comprehensive event analytics that includes participant engagement metrics, popular questions, and feedback scores. This can significantly aid in future event planning and in the analysis of audience engagement.
Quizzes with Leaderboards: provides features like quizzes with leaderboards which can be utilized in creating a competitive and interactive environment. This adds an element of fun and can increase audience participation.
Idea Upvoting: provides a feature of upvoting, where participants can upvote the ideas or questions they find most interesting. This helps in prioritizing the most popular or relevant content and facilitates a more effective discussion.
Lack of direct email integration: While allows for direct connection to emails, doesn't have an in-built email integration. For individuals or companies that regularly use email as a method of interaction, this can be rather prohibitive.
Not focused on one-on-one meetings: While is designed with enhanced features to manage one-on-one meetings, is more general and not specific for one-to-one meetings.
Limited pre-meeting preparation tools: has a feature that allows participants to prepare for the meeting in advance, allowing them to write down points they wish to cover. However, lacks such specified pre-meeting preparation tools.
Absence of custom timing and reminders: lacks a feature that has for custom time allotments and reminders, ensuring that all topics are discussed within the allotted time.
Limited interactive capabilities: While offers a voting feature, which increases engagement, does not. This lack of interactive capabilities can lessen the level of engagement during meetings.

Pick #9

Klaxxoon is an interactive platform that offers a comprehensive suite of tools to improve team collaboration and engagement. As an alternative to, it emphasizes synchronous communication and high participant engagement through features like interactive brainstorming boards, quizzes, surveys, and live meeting tools. Unlike which provides a platform for structured, sequential discussion to ensure equal speaking time, focuses on enabling dynamic interaction and fostering creativity amongst team members during meetings or training sessions. It seeks to adapt digital collaboration to various learning styles and workflows, promoting inclusivity and continuous feedback in real-time.

Versatile Tools: Klaxoon offers a wide range of engaging tools such as quizzes, surveys, brainstorming tools, and more, which are excellent for enabling effective teamwork and creative problem solving, an area in which it outperforms
Integration with Other Platforms: Klaxoon integrates seamlessly with popular platforms such as Microsoft Teams and Slack, making it more accessible and adaptable to pre-existing workflows, a feature not as robust in
Synced Work: In Klaxoon, changes made in real-time are synced across all connected devices. This ensures everyone on-board is updated with the latest information, enhancing productivity, and reducing communication lags compared to
Offline Mode: Unlike, Klaxoon provides an offline mode. This allows users to continue their work without internet connection, canering to remote or low connectivity areas more effectively.
Scalability: Klaxoon can accommodate a larger number of participants, which makes it a good option for larger teams or organizations compared to
Klaxoon requires installation on all user devices, whereas is completely browser-based. This can lead to technical difficulties and compatibility issues.
Klaxoon functions more like a suite of various collaboration tools rather than a focused platform, which can lead to functionality overload and unintentional misconfiguration. On the other hand, is a more focused platform specifically designed for certain functionalities.
Klaxoon’s interface is visually busier and less minimalist compared to, and this can lead to distractions or difficulties in managing tasks or discussions.
Klaxoon lacks the feature of creating a democratic environment by providing every participant an equal amount of time to speak, which could negatively impact the productivity of meetings.
Klaxoon is more suitable for larger teams or classrooms, and might not be optimised for smaller gatherings or one-on-one sessions, unlike which can facilitate both larger and smaller meetings with equal efficiency.


EqualTime shines in scenarios where teams thrive on collaboration and fairness in meeting discussions. It’s the go-to software for organizations that prioritize equitable participation, allowing every voice to be heard equally. Perfect for diverse teams or remote environments where ensuring that all participants have an opportunity to contribute is crucial. Its unique features facilitate balanced dialogues, making it ideal for companies focused on inclusivity and those aiming to enhance team cohesion through improved meeting dynamics.

On the other hand, adopting an alternative software product makes sense for teams with specific needs that exceed just balanced conversation facilitation. When the requirements include advanced project management tools, in-depth analytics, or integrated task assignments within the meeting platform, looking beyond EqualTime could be beneficial. Such alternatives may offer a more comprehensive suite of features tailored to complex workflows or industries that demand more than just equitable speaking time, providing a holistic solution that addresses broader operational efficiencies.

Top 10: Best Equaltime Alternative